From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E8703A7F5F; Tue, 26 May 2026 12:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779798787; cv=none; b=pMJuQrKEhir1odEVEXhoNJxRxHYsPsXMEDa7By56y6AIV4YiY7pF+Eg+tvkKcbgSrmLWkUktnXu5sshcz/n0ZME06nhk1XUFNIWw9K8/k79L/6EDU6FCPsIcXK3W5TEgvD7oFjOXInLeZ3qdqKd0xznEcnUOMhzt7o+u+npke2s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779798787; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YRUex1hghA+tO41he3dHRIZQx/gJ1U/095M/6qHa47E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=l0vEhy1X7p1GYFKRGEk5m4Ss0AURWgteqrfI2cEwwvjyZWX/3EJ60zRrWpYuxs4wNdBCJDxp8JJYOSpUVzqOnz/pgK0NEmTCvolvB0pqQAOL+n2pZhLs6squFs8xr6hw5WODEVpVy7C5mr5o+GrhLNvB8m5y+mqzTdGTBM++IG8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LPyFj7Fi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LPyFj7Fi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE7C11F000E9; Tue, 26 May 2026 12:33:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779798785; bh=UXy+Aq3ip8ggzdAob3fH1MwYAHbx0+lsclrzD0G6o8Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=LPyFj7Fi/8dsVw+6KLIF3BQeHFNvnYUAHDLUn+9cvtKgFfeoJPLCv0wXAUzwY5Rk2 AebALP6aVBQr1C3Qpmswmy+KrWdhLFV0RMdoGZLYVQ4dXipG0If4ZDGpAvtoEb4Rhv 4B2xW/UDP1eYZgKwZUbbVUforJgUFyBidA+Z2cGHT3INUyMchg+239WbgMwt8qbkh9 ShRLuNTbJdzTx73JwXczuKZUYUo/6eq6vBjA+ovnx6/cw3FpkUWghIFjiMvObZQ0Zr kD1vgyWsH7IfBASq6FvSlO/cZFgIDJHrEJi8k80o8jhAxvthcWSLn9oagATDvk/4Jj nUDtkvro3rKlA== Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 13:32:56 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Piyush Patle Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Klinger , Andy Shevchenko , Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/11] dt-bindings: iio: adc: hx711: add HX710B support Message-ID: <20260526133256.4b781fa6@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20260518220228.63322-1-piyushpatle228@gmail.com> <20260518220228.63322-5-piyushpatle228@gmail.com> <20260520111919.5e99fe72@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 24 May 2026 08:15:27 +0530 Piyush Patle wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 3:49=E2=80=AFPM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > On Tue, 19 May 2026 03:32:20 +0530 > > Piyush Patle wrote: > > =20 > > > Add the avia,hx710b compatible and document the HX710B-specific > > > DVDD and VREF supplies. > > > > > > Add constraints that forbid HX711-only properties on HX710B nodes and > > > require vref-supply for HX710B, then add a separate HX710B example. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Piyush Patle > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley =20 > > FWIW the only thing Sashiko doesn't like is dvdd is enabled for the old > > parts. Move it to the earlier supply adding patch for hx711 and we shou= ld > > be good to go! > > > > Jonathan =20 >=20 > Because dvdd-supply now lands in 02/11 as a shared property, I will > remove it from 04/11's properties block. The allOf constraint in > 04/11 does NOT gain a dvdd-supply: false in the else (HX711) branch > DVDD is valid and meaningful for HX711 nodes too. The only things > forbidden for HX711 remain vref-supply (else branch); the only things > forbidden for HX710B remain vsup-supply and rate-gpios (then branch). > I think this will be a suitable approach, right ?? Yes. Sounds right to me. Jonathan