From: Kaitao Cheng <kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
To: dennis@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, cl@gentwo.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev,
Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm/percpu: Preserve NOFS/NOIO scope during chunk create and populate
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 21:29:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260528132917.81123-2-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528132917.81123-1-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
pcpu_alloc_noprof() derives pcpu_gfp from the caller supplied GFP mask and
passes it to the backing percpu allocators. This preserves GFP_NOFS and
GFP_NOIO for pcpu_alloc_pages() and for the initial pcpu_chunk allocation.
However, the chunk creation and population slow paths also call helpers
which do not take a GFP mask and perform internal allocations with
GFP_KERNEL. For example, pcpu_create_chunk() calls pcpu_get_vm_areas(),
and population can allocate temporary metadata or page tables while mapping
backing pages. As a result, a caller which explicitly uses GFP_NOFS or
GFP_NOIO can still enter FS or IO reclaim while creating or populating a
percpu chunk.
This is problematic for callers which use GFP_NOFS or GFP_NOIO because
they are already holding filesystem or IO-path locks. If free chunks are
exhausted, the percpu allocation can take pcpu_alloc_mutex and then enter
unconstrained reclaim from these internal allocations, defeating the
caller's allocation context and potentially recreating reclaim lock
dependencies.
Wrap chunk creation and population in a scoped NOIO or NOFS context when
pcpu_gfp has the corresponding constraints. Leave ordinary GFP_KERNEL
allocations unchanged so they retain full reclaim capability.
Fixes: 9a5b183941b5 ("mm, percpu: do not consider sleepable allocations atomic")
Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
---
mm/percpu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 71a85d7245c7..1bb38467390b 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -1778,6 +1778,23 @@ static void pcpu_alloc_tag_free_hook(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int off, size_t s
}
#endif
+static unsigned int pcpu_memalloc_scope_save(gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ if (!(gfp & __GFP_IO))
+ return memalloc_noio_save();
+ if (!(gfp & __GFP_FS))
+ return memalloc_nofs_save();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void pcpu_memalloc_scope_restore(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int flags)
+{
+ if (!(gfp & __GFP_IO))
+ memalloc_noio_restore(flags);
+ else if (!(gfp & __GFP_FS))
+ memalloc_nofs_restore(flags);
+}
+
/**
* pcpu_alloc - the percpu allocator
* @size: size of area to allocate in bytes
@@ -1901,7 +1918,12 @@ void __percpu *pcpu_alloc_noprof(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved,
/* No space left. Create a new chunk. */
if (list_empty(&pcpu_chunk_lists[pcpu_free_slot])) {
+ unsigned int pcpu_scope;
+
+ pcpu_scope = pcpu_memalloc_scope_save(pcpu_gfp);
chunk = pcpu_create_chunk(pcpu_gfp);
+ pcpu_memalloc_scope_restore(pcpu_gfp, pcpu_scope);
+
if (!chunk) {
err = "failed to allocate new chunk";
goto fail;
@@ -1931,9 +1953,13 @@ void __percpu *pcpu_alloc_noprof(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved,
page_end = PFN_UP(off + size);
for_each_clear_bitrange_from(rs, re, chunk->populated, page_end) {
+ unsigned int pcpu_scope;
+
WARN_ON(chunk->immutable);
+ pcpu_scope = pcpu_memalloc_scope_save(pcpu_gfp);
ret = pcpu_populate_chunk(chunk, rs, re, pcpu_gfp);
+ pcpu_memalloc_scope_restore(pcpu_gfp, pcpu_scope);
spin_lock_irqsave(&pcpu_lock, flags);
if (ret) {
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 13:29 [PATCH 0/2] mm/percpu: Fix possible NOFS/NOIO reclaim recursion Kaitao Cheng
2026-05-28 13:29 ` Kaitao Cheng [this message]
2026-05-29 9:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/percpu: Preserve NOFS/NOIO scope during chunk create and populate Pedro Falcato
2026-05-29 9:38 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-05-30 12:47 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-05-30 13:32 ` Dennis Zhou
2026-06-01 2:27 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-01 15:45 ` Michal Hocko
2026-06-02 3:03 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-02 7:16 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-02 8:05 ` Michal Hocko
2026-06-02 9:02 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-02 7:17 ` Michal Hocko
2026-06-02 13:46 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-05-28 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/percpu: Avoid pcpu_alloc_mutex recursion from reclaim Kaitao Cheng
2026-05-29 9:34 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-05-28 21:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm/percpu: Fix possible NOFS/NOIO reclaim recursion Andrew Morton
2026-05-28 21:10 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260528132917.81123-2-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
--to=kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox