From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E52E335BA; Sun, 31 May 2026 12:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780230841; cv=none; b=fWKC72d4Ol7GczEIXLZRt+LV6rmkxlYQL9sbzFaSf7UudhhwMhIkDzDQu/xJDYPLtJsNieCayVUU+71BT/Xo5IgtUNIil14/KU/UkztOTz0zvaA4V7ScRDhjymuAkHKoOpk9VwfjH9Xsp5O+VvDCYg6m7F9KgRw/NbVYXoPUIwo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780230841; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o1/NV/2/xBrlmCzMxvTMtKUXL1B7POeYLmC9Djrm684=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oWO9zjmHqoETgKlynzaFduxOLhmeOn9XqBwIUSUGk75FeT8p+B7GGnV+j3k1ONSEqQovhQcimryC/BbqsaKm6ifTc5nTBAAOyyf0AkS8tev0CJJcqdejkOEuGfPf5stTzNfTcnte5tNV9QiC9DWP0jr+VQNSkmyuX2kz30uT1WU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=D+k7/jRM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="D+k7/jRM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ED561F00893; Sun, 31 May 2026 12:33:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780230839; bh=7GG6KQd5aX+5r9GRl8R9AHSJCz+bGDBDGfIlmgsIxCE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=D+k7/jRMZgv6UDD+8mDBRak0bpERKAEgdl0DnOT6cEGv68m2oZZPflMWDBBXg5KWi EV1ZTasmRmvCR5K4wUnFwuxGI4UFBxTrB8VIkyoOxEMJhKm2Hdx3kXSUFWABLYa5dl R857gEWCreSSrUZSWoA1vXoNxykP5uKrmDxRXa9g8PwZ4mJ+Tj3DcZE209YZaC3qLh UrR+cW3Tzl+DZE0QoQX9HUKTlv6NiK5BwG8u3tKhIzVz417gaHdjgMCwI1Xr9/2d2T hy8MHXRUpjMrtzXg+LOvnaiOuMuTXmfVYFy9DCc8Qrr7VwPMf2feHqgDE08pj2k21Z olhv99IQCYZrQ== Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 14:33:41 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, bvanassche@acm.org, andersson@kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com, abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com, luca.weiss@fairphone.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy: Add Hawi UFS PHY compatible Message-ID: <20260531-rigorous-gay-sturgeon-e8cfe2@quoll> References: <20260526090956.2340262-1-palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260526090956.2340262-2-palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260526090956.2340262-2-palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com> On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 02:39:54PM +0530, palash.kambar@oss.qualcomm.com wrote: > From: Palash Kambar > > Document QMP UFS PHY compatible for Hawi SoC. Lack of compatibility is a mistake or intentional? Best regards, Krzysztof