From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1287A3D7D77; Wed, 3 Jun 2026 11:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780486067; cv=none; b=bqRKlMM3a4OMfFHCgcTulN/2X74ZfeVIEsaz6X6mk3V9kjghGzxdKmepqPKmc0r3DaqrhPmOdHzFDn5LCzd3fFZ9cjVwQgb4iT1IQVcyaZJkJAaK/KA0lajvLr16unFS0VThw5PRuC2JyvqL5GyjhQc5CO/0guwKJampOMuagug= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780486067; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uUloJLDR/+8k+kdIq3y/lojUZwX4d30zMUIMrvc+ZGI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=a9v7GChkrZuC8s9+toJSxe37ZvKCDrNd4r9UoGJZ7wRAIKiVy74erm9O6X1Q+sW2B7m3IfM3OYCnP+1NiZdXPmOHKmOHeriw6YGsfxMj1C4UKtXTlOTGQlFI9XFMG8tPqdpfI/ExxN/N0IENCSRhAkE3CtghSnIPQRxvKXgzQKs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=H4IF+SS1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="H4IF+SS1" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7467C153B; Wed, 3 Jun 2026 04:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (e132581.arm.com [10.1.196.87]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEE093F86F; Wed, 3 Jun 2026 04:27:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1780486065; bh=uUloJLDR/+8k+kdIq3y/lojUZwX4d30zMUIMrvc+ZGI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=H4IF+SS1tB0UfSft+S7DQqbevfdPjoQppXCBXARrA+Dr5T3XsyCRTqSG59r+fCxJd CjkJeEm4IEpG5tlve2EbRscHtP/HB1Bw8bGf0EV0RZFjWYXYCv7Mc/AL9Ga25Lt8iN IhfCdiy7X6/d3FIXfP6QiKLWbPrm4f2OZdUExh+k= Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 12:27:42 +0100 From: Leo Yan To: James Clark Cc: Suzuki K Poulose , Mike Leach , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Amir Ayupov , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Paschalis Mpeis , coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/18] perf test: Add deterministic workload Message-ID: <20260603112742.GT101133@e132581.arm.com> References: <20260602-james-cs-context-tracking-fix-v2-0-85b5ce6f55c6@linaro.org> <20260602-james-cs-context-tracking-fix-v2-5-85b5ce6f55c6@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260602-james-cs-context-tracking-fix-v2-5-85b5ce6f55c6@linaro.org> On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 03:26:47PM +0100, James Clark wrote: [...] > @@ -22,3 +23,4 @@ CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > CFLAGS_traploop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE > CFLAGS_inlineloop.o = -g -O2 > +CFLAGS_deterministic.o = -g -O0 I have no strong opinion for using 'noinline' in source or using the global option '-fno-inline', just thought this is not easy to follow up if anyone (likely myself) will write a new workload for disabling inline. Could we have consistent style for this? For the patch itself: Reviewed-by: Leo Yan