From: JP Kobryn <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>
To: vbabka@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
ziy@nvidia.com
Cc: shakeel.butt@linux.dev, usama.arif@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm/compaction: cap compact_gap() at COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 23:17:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604061725.13800-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev> (raw)
From: "JP Kobryn" <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>
compact_gap() returns 2 << order, which is used as watermark headroom in
__compaction_suitable() and as a threshold in kswapd reclaim decisions.
The computed value scales exponentially by order. For order-9 THP
allocations this evaluates to 1024 pages, but the compaction free scanner's
working set is bounded by COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX (32 pages). The scanner
stops isolating free pages once it matches the migration batch. The
current gap over-reserves by 32x.
On fragmented production hosts, kswapd will try to reclaim up to the gap,
but it only reaches that threshold in 18% of attempts. As a result,
reclaim continues in the majority of cases despite many lower-order free
pages being available. The over-sized gap also causes 46% of order-9
compaction suitability checks to fail unnecessarily: the zone has
sufficient free pages for the scanner to operate, but not enough to clear
the inflated threshold.
Cap compact_gap() at COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX so the watermark headroom reflects
the scanner's actual capacity. This function is used by two key
heuristics. The first is when kswapd can stop high-order reclaim and
downgrade to order-0 balancing, allowing kcompactd to be woken for the
original higher allocation order. The second is zone suitability checking,
where the smaller gap allows compaction to start sooner.
Note that orders 0-4 are unaffected since their gap is already less than or
equal to COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX.
A/B test on v6.13-based instagram production hosts (64GB, 60s measurement):
Unpatched (43 hosts)
pgscan_kswapd (mean/host): ~1.6M
reclaim efficiency (steal/scan): 83.8%
per-compaction success (success/stall): 2.1%
THP success (alloc/alloc+fallback): 4.9%
forced lru_add_drain (mean/host): ~107K
Patched (59 hosts)
pgscan_kswapd (mean/host): ~449K
reclaim efficiency (steal/scan): 91.0%
per-compaction success (success/stall): 28.3%
THP success (alloc/alloc+fallback): 17.2%
forced lru_add_drain (mean/host): ~64K
Additional tests were also performed using a workload of similar shape and
based on mm-new at the time of testing. Across three 60s runs, the patch
showed improvements consistent with the previous test: reduced kswapd
reclaim and fewer THP fault fallbacks.
Unpatched
kswapd_shrink_node downgrade to order-0 (mean): 0
thp_fault_fallback (mean): 1217
pgscan_kswapd (mean): 6328
pgsteal_kswapd (mean): 5657
Patched
kswapd_shrink_node downgrade to order-0 (mean): 28
thp_fault_fallback (mean): 738
pgscan_kswapd (mean): 3773
pgsteal_kswapd (mean): 3243
Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn (Meta) <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
---
v2:
- reword changelog and add mm-new validation data
- update comment in kswapd_shrink_node to reflect the gap change
- no functional changes
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260519200851.141955-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev/
include/linux/compaction.h | 8 ++++----
mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/compaction.h b/include/linux/compaction.h
index c829c48d1c71..f29ef0653546 100644
--- a/include/linux/compaction.h
+++ b/include/linux/compaction.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
#define _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
+#include <linux/swap.h>
+
/*
* Determines how hard direct compaction should try to succeed.
* Lower value means higher priority, analogically to reclaim priority.
@@ -73,11 +75,9 @@ static inline unsigned long compact_gap(unsigned int order)
* effectively limited by COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX, as that's the maximum
* that the migrate scanner can have isolated on migrate list, and free
* scanner is only invoked when the number of isolated free pages is
- * lower than that. But it's not worth to complicate the formula here
- * as a bigger gap for higher orders than strictly necessary can also
- * improve chances of compaction success.
+ * lower than that.
*/
- return 2UL << order;
+ return min(2UL << order, COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX);
}
static inline int current_is_kcompactd(void)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index e8a90911bf88..3f3ff25e561a 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -7014,7 +7014,7 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat,
/*
* Fragmentation may mean that the system cannot be rebalanced for
- * high-order allocations. If twice the allocation size has been
+ * high-order allocations. If at least the compaction gap has been
* reclaimed then recheck watermarks only at order-0 to prevent
* excessive reclaim. Assume that a process requested a high-order
* can direct reclaim/compact.
--
2.54.0
reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604061725.13800-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev \
--to=jp.kobryn@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox