The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JP Kobryn <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>
To: vbabka@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, surenb@google.com,
	mhocko@suse.com, jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	ziy@nvidia.com
Cc: shakeel.butt@linux.dev, usama.arif@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm/compaction: cap compact_gap() at COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX
Date: Wed,  3 Jun 2026 23:17:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604061725.13800-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev> (raw)

From: "JP Kobryn" <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>

compact_gap() returns 2 << order, which is used as watermark headroom in
__compaction_suitable() and as a threshold in kswapd reclaim decisions.
The computed value scales exponentially by order.  For order-9 THP
allocations this evaluates to 1024 pages, but the compaction free scanner's
working set is bounded by COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX (32 pages).  The scanner
stops isolating free pages once it matches the migration batch.  The
current gap over-reserves by 32x.

On fragmented production hosts, kswapd will try to reclaim up to the gap,
but it only reaches that threshold in 18% of attempts.  As a result,
reclaim continues in the majority of cases despite many lower-order free
pages being available.  The over-sized gap also causes 46% of order-9
compaction suitability checks to fail unnecessarily: the zone has
sufficient free pages for the scanner to operate, but not enough to clear
the inflated threshold.

Cap compact_gap() at COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX so the watermark headroom reflects
the scanner's actual capacity.  This function is used by two key
heuristics.  The first is when kswapd can stop high-order reclaim and
downgrade to order-0 balancing, allowing kcompactd to be woken for the
original higher allocation order.  The second is zone suitability checking,
where the smaller gap allows compaction to start sooner.

Note that orders 0-4 are unaffected since their gap is already less than or
equal to COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX.

A/B test on v6.13-based instagram production hosts (64GB, 60s measurement):

Unpatched (43 hosts)
pgscan_kswapd (mean/host): ~1.6M
reclaim efficiency (steal/scan): 83.8%
per-compaction success (success/stall): 2.1%
THP success (alloc/alloc+fallback): 4.9%
forced lru_add_drain (mean/host): ~107K

Patched (59 hosts)
pgscan_kswapd (mean/host): ~449K
reclaim efficiency (steal/scan): 91.0%
per-compaction success (success/stall): 28.3%
THP success (alloc/alloc+fallback): 17.2%
forced lru_add_drain (mean/host): ~64K

Additional tests were also performed using a workload of similar shape and
based on mm-new at the time of testing.  Across three 60s runs, the patch
showed improvements consistent with the previous test: reduced kswapd
reclaim and fewer THP fault fallbacks.

Unpatched
kswapd_shrink_node downgrade to order-0 (mean): 0
thp_fault_fallback (mean): 1217
pgscan_kswapd (mean): 6328
pgsteal_kswapd (mean): 5657

Patched
kswapd_shrink_node downgrade to order-0 (mean): 28
thp_fault_fallback (mean): 738
pgscan_kswapd (mean): 3773
pgsteal_kswapd (mean): 3243

Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn (Meta) <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
---
v2:
  - reword changelog and add mm-new validation data
  - update comment in kswapd_shrink_node to reflect the gap change
  - no functional changes

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260519200851.141955-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev/

 include/linux/compaction.h | 8 ++++----
 mm/vmscan.c                | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/compaction.h b/include/linux/compaction.h
index c829c48d1c71..f29ef0653546 100644
--- a/include/linux/compaction.h
+++ b/include/linux/compaction.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 #ifndef _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
 #define _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
 
+#include <linux/swap.h>
+
 /*
  * Determines how hard direct compaction should try to succeed.
  * Lower value means higher priority, analogically to reclaim priority.
@@ -73,11 +75,9 @@ static inline unsigned long compact_gap(unsigned int order)
 	 * effectively limited by COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX, as that's the maximum
 	 * that the migrate scanner can have isolated on migrate list, and free
 	 * scanner is only invoked when the number of isolated free pages is
-	 * lower than that. But it's not worth to complicate the formula here
-	 * as a bigger gap for higher orders than strictly necessary can also
-	 * improve chances of compaction success.
+	 * lower than that.
 	 */
-	return 2UL << order;
+	return min(2UL << order, COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX);
 }
 
 static inline int current_is_kcompactd(void)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index e8a90911bf88..3f3ff25e561a 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -7014,7 +7014,7 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat,
 
 	/*
 	 * Fragmentation may mean that the system cannot be rebalanced for
-	 * high-order allocations. If twice the allocation size has been
+	 * high-order allocations. If at least the compaction gap has been
 	 * reclaimed then recheck watermarks only at order-0 to prevent
 	 * excessive reclaim. Assume that a process requested a high-order
 	 * can direct reclaim/compact.
-- 
2.54.0


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-06-04  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260604061725.13800-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev \
    --to=jp.kobryn@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox