From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3.1] sched/isolation: Defer freeing of cpumask memblock memory to initcall
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 14:24:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604182440.430811-1-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
When testing a linux-next kernel with commit 59bd1d914bb5 ("memblock:
warn when freeing reserved memory before memory map is initialized"),
the following warning was hit when there was a "nohz_full" kernel boot
parameter.
Cannot free reserved memory because of deferred initialization of the memory map
WARNING: mm/memblock.c:904 at __free_reserved_area+0xde/0xf0, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
:
Call Trace:
<TASK>
memblock_phys_free+0xcb/0x100
housekeeping_init+0x14c/0x170
start_kernel+0x207/0x450
x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30
x86_64_start_kernel+0xda/0xe0
common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141
</TASK>
IOW, we shouldn't free memblock allocated memory so early
in the boot process when memory map isn't fully initialized in
deferred_init_memmap().
Fix it by saving the housekeeping cpumask memblock memory to
be freed into a free list in housekeeping_init() and add a new
housekeeping_late_init() helper to defer the actual freeing of memblock
memory to when initcall's are being processed. The non-atomic version
of the llist APIs are used as there is no contention.
This commit also depends on the presence of commit 7c2eee9c1367
("memblock: don't touch memblock arrays when memblock_free() is called
late") to prevent a KASAN UAF bug report [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260505051821.1107133-1-longman@redhat.com/
Fixes: 27c3a5967f05 ("sched/isolation: Convert housekeeping cpumasks to rcu pointers")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/sched/isolation.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[v3.1] Add __initdata to memblock_freelist
diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index ef152d401fe2..156025ef81b7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
*
*/
#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
+#include <linux/llist.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include "sched.h"
@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ struct housekeeping {
};
static struct housekeeping housekeeping;
+static __initdata LLIST_HEAD(memblock_freelist);
bool housekeeping_enabled(enum hk_type type)
{
@@ -189,10 +191,22 @@ void __init housekeeping_init(void)
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(omask));
cpumask_copy(nmask, omask);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], nmask);
- memblock_free(omask, cpumask_size());
+ __llist_add((struct llist_node *)omask, &memblock_freelist);
}
}
+static int __init housekeeping_late_init(void)
+{
+ struct llist_node *llnode, *pos, *t;
+
+ /* Free allocated memblock memory, if any */
+ llnode = __llist_del_all(&memblock_freelist);
+ llist_for_each_safe(pos, t, llnode)
+ memblock_free(pos, cpumask_size());
+ return 0;
+}
+pure_initcall(housekeeping_late_init);
+
static void __init housekeeping_setup_type(enum hk_type type,
cpumask_var_t housekeeping_staging)
{
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 18:24 Waiman Long [this message]
2026-06-30 21:36 ` [PATCH v3.1] sched/isolation: Defer freeing of cpumask memblock memory to initcall Waiman Long
2026-07-01 13:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-07-01 14:13 ` Phil Auld
2026-07-01 14:25 ` Phil Auld
2026-07-01 14:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-07-01 19:03 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604182440.430811-1-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox