From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify xlated insns for global percpu data
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 22:51:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608145113.65857-9-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608145113.65857-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Add a test to verify global percpu data related xlated insns:
1. ld_imm64: compare xlated one with the one in ELF object file.
2. mov64_percpu_reg: it is added by verifier.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c | 11 +++
2 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
index 729878d5d3b3..c3b9423246b5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
@@ -249,6 +249,90 @@ static void test_global_percpu_data_verifier_log(void)
RUN_TESTS(test_global_percpu_data);
}
+static int find_ld_imm64(const struct bpf_insn *insns, size_t insn_cnt, struct bpf_insn *ld_imm64)
+{
+ size_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++) {
+ if (insns[i].code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW)) {
+ ld_imm64[0] = insns[i];
+ ld_imm64[1] = insns[i + 1];
+ return i;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return -ENOENT;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Special (internal-only) form of mov, used to resolve per-CPU addrs:
+ * dst_reg = src_reg + <percpu_base_off>
+ * BPF_ADDR_PERCPU is used as a special insn->off value.
+ */
+#define BPF_ADDR_PERCPU (-1)
+
+#define BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(DST, SRC) \
+ ((struct bpf_insn) { \
+ .code = BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X, \
+ .dst_reg = DST, \
+ .src_reg = SRC, \
+ .off = BPF_ADDR_PERCPU, \
+ .imm = 0 })
+
+static __u64 ld_imm64_to_u64(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+ return ((__u64) insn[1].imm << 32) | (__u64) insn[0].imm;
+}
+
+static void test_global_percpu_data_xlated(void)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn ld_imm64_raw[2], ld_imm64_xlated[2], mov64_percpu_reg, *insns = NULL;
+ size_t insn_sz = sizeof(struct bpf_insn);
+ struct test_global_percpu_data *skel;
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
+ int idx, err;
+ __u32 cnt;
+
+ skel = test_global_percpu_data__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_global_percpu_data__open"))
+ return;
+
+ prog = skel->progs.verifier_percpu_read;
+ idx = find_ld_imm64(bpf_program__insns(prog), bpf_program__insn_cnt(prog), ld_imm64_raw);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(idx, 0, "find_ld_imm64 raw"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = test_global_percpu_data__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_global_percpu_data__load"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = get_xlated_program(bpf_program__fd(prog), &insns, &cnt);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_xlated_program"))
+ goto out;
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(cnt, idx + 2, "xlated insn count"))
+ goto out;
+
+ idx = find_ld_imm64(insns, cnt, ld_imm64_xlated);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(idx, 0, "find_ld_imm64 xlated"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(ld_imm64_xlated[0].code, ld_imm64_raw[0].code, "ld_imm64 opcode");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ld_imm64_xlated[0].dst_reg == ld_imm64_raw[0].dst_reg, "ld_imm64 dst_reg");
+ /*
+ * The xlated instruction has the map ID in imm and the offset
+ * in the next instruction's imm. The raw instruction just has
+ * the offset in its imm.
+ */
+ ASSERT_EQ(ld_imm64_xlated[1].imm, ld_imm64_to_u64(ld_imm64_raw), "ld_imm64 off");
+
+ mov64_percpu_reg = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(ld_imm64_raw[0].dst_reg, ld_imm64_raw[0].dst_reg);
+ ASSERT_MEMEQ(&insns[idx + 2], &mov64_percpu_reg, insn_sz, "mov64_percpu_reg");
+
+out:
+ test_global_percpu_data__destroy(skel);
+ free(insns);
+}
+
void test_global_percpu_data(void)
{
if (!feat_supported(NULL, FEAT_PERCPU_DATA)) {
@@ -262,4 +346,6 @@ void test_global_percpu_data(void)
test_global_percpu_data_lskel();
if (test__start_subtest("verifier_log"))
test_global_percpu_data_verifier_log();
+ if (test__start_subtest("xlated"))
+ test_global_percpu_data_xlated();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
index 2222ad3a49bd..9a1b1a314c2f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
@@ -51,4 +51,15 @@ int verifier_snprintf(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+static volatile const char fmt2[] SEC(".percpu.fmt") = "data %d\n";
+
+SEC("kprobe")
+__auxiliary
+int verifier_percpu_read(void *ctx)
+{
+ char c = fmt2[4];
+
+ return c == ' ';
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 14:51 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/9] bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/9] libbpf: Probe percpu data feature Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/9] libbpf: Add support for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/9] bpftool: Generate skeleton " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:29 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify verifier log for " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify bpf_iter " Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608145113.65857-9-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox