From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE28340D574 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781038870; cv=none; b=qLV8blmQIje62qJuqDnpm4eZYpmtuSzVsw97uJ590YGD1g6ooCdpKPWt4aeexpUy4fjmhPnz1OBVA8hIZYXPsfFPDPUfQXD/dkf6gZVG0+ZH/uRcqa8hbhYloukejd2EiQ83bh2eNfJFzSOWBfo3fb4GeoM3+wkON5dRQwtci54= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781038870; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VS1fojAadH5LM2pjMyTnwu5WrIXvP+3MgWwVuP33wPY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oXjtfK+1PpojtgXJV0fa0Kg3ad9T/5Eq5lTtzMo3GSfKDM4SftvrM5KJqTNGEP/7cA8d/VVdiIoGDMt7Y3zxHSROVzBCj+ZAkAMobuzV/+1CtxJ6ol9dlpGqgd17k3y8/wYp9vNz2svOEOUta3AG3gtagbhsWkJuw7KHvlfLjQE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=QHBCfjWO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=WoAwXVfb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="QHBCfjWO"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WoAwXVfb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1781038867; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0Om/173xa6nAXXlawHrWQ0qeVuAob6cSlyHSyIFpCw4=; b=QHBCfjWOhPvwmPndItwupnZDfWkZNcwdm7CYOMp1KQvgvMrpq9JByIlyKn5UnKlaqs+8Kk l20HI0WRM12yQOEPgu5z/2Y/ohqw1sw8RwKt6X0upVwCVaEggta025xVk8AsLbKaffVz2R L/PzDYmfDVLZ3NCj3GyOn052OcCw1es= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-369-39KG2J8xNg6USb8GRuWe-A-1; Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:01:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 39KG2J8xNg6USb8GRuWe-A-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 39KG2J8xNg6USb8GRuWe-A_1781038865 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-490b3ec3f7fso38791225e9.1 for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:01:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1781038865; x=1781643665; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0Om/173xa6nAXXlawHrWQ0qeVuAob6cSlyHSyIFpCw4=; b=WoAwXVfbH2l0HYWpxbuzSL4LLzT1RrTCTAH5ZlL9cMsucjxbEusChNebfydYtm5gMV QESv63nILLSza68IbaM5gGRFkkNb9ZD6lg6+zSL657fv4uSdm3CaHN21JMmczdX8bmtR Az9W3YbRhwNUjErjetCMNBjpwFCSuzidGr3GtgNVW6SDuFhAuNgA7udVAAX1g9SWMoD7 Wgy3ZEVEDsq+9EKuaTjsY6dZQlDaAXrP2kvFJmbVcyfugZpZqFY2/9PYaGxYMPpMCswi WRcysylZDh+adY/UX44NcgaZ7V7z7Qn1/WQo4We7hZu/Gbl6boahROGsPfofxmW9XvDY ECdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1781038865; x=1781643665; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0Om/173xa6nAXXlawHrWQ0qeVuAob6cSlyHSyIFpCw4=; b=X1LcbsZzj/Nx27yHiVhrjdyVm8WfxXDcgVVvzn517cvv9/mpLO6pAbHJOnJSakP5I0 Qeti1IxV6nGdllCv/DOTbiHEn28FKXAsUNuWimbVgniwdVVKq8p1FTxXMYY4onjgoEAx UTt9rrmr7H55m9k5mUGbUR2vLeBw5CWEsUeufdy6SVNFskgY3SukcjeUa2jJ+RS5+MkY 4dTT011kbkbGI2LFpZEYsIJN8Txd9eaEecDCBBRLf3vAnoRnAkYAVREwdd2zz5K+sCoz qZAUl9jE+TlwRDHce+cjTAT8crSFE+GAaiXpts9fOGF/swcDS0+gRipPpO/pWi8OXUHP 6O3w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ+UtGbHCKSAJ6wclK/FncWOzb67QVu1Zxk2lD6smyG6yP4HhZR9ejstYRINd1Q6m/V17F9imn2S2ZlMsjY=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz5oZImailFmDH2q1swUxVDE+aY5WjR5YtLThOA4H9snQAmZe6B ke7ugSKS97+vlyhnCgWyFK9qH+uF50sSEFoAdXPO5RN5dFKyf5I39SBvW7/s+94j6QUM1zheExZ p9SiecAWfWC6mawgOsvh6Pp1Ieo5yq0x7CmpuQC9QIOhJq10JkQL81AcSS6atwVoOQw== X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OGr+hSmgkAdaBPSMfSgRAa5bvCCxCYc47w3MXXqp90y8qejN3LPv5xfz7ZbA0P RTPPPBsr5L+9QdYnzlQDayo+jVnyx9L8LmOBrKuL229/b7C93dVDxomv019EgQDn8N+MIqUepXY aqCDKcR0/tIWOb1y157QXr/1ZZ33jAtZbQQwopuxlYYj5jhForolD3DTlMgREFJHvlkaVJ2De/u BPnW7nYLx99tbuyWL3lwFxcLJf33wKRgeSFOnMyGUck9klZqRo+UjGo5tjcT4HA6zwTD41/iUGB teM8RZB1WG1WUTS1ibtVHvEb3t2fwT0gollfcx1vlVO7irxRdEnYKGjXmm6ARikMujMmiQsl+BT KeQCtc1kTRU8ZBJy2xih7RLQjo5fg3tTjuP6IMc/qGNGHOACld/n0dg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1907:b0:490:b99c:9337 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-490c25a0800mr343765875e9.10.1781038865162; Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:01:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1907:b0:490:b99c:9337 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-490c25a0800mr343765005e9.10.1781038864641; Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (IGLD-80-230-85-71.inter.net.il. [80.230.85.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4601f2dc577sm66817831f8f.3.2026.06.09.14.00.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 17:00:55 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Zi Yan Cc: Miaohe Lin , "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Muchun Song , Oscar Salvador , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Brendan Jackman , Johannes Weiner , Baolin Wang , Nico Pache , Ryan Roberts , Dev Jain , Barry Song , Lance Yang , Hugh Dickins , Matthew Brost , Joshua Hahn , Rakie Kim , Byungchul Park , Gregory Price , Ying Huang , Alistair Popple , Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Roman Gushchin , Harry Yoo , Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , Chris Li , Kairui Song , Kemeng Shi , Nhat Pham , Baoquan He , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrea Arcangeli , Naoya Horiguchi Subject: Re: [PATCH splitout] mm: memory-failure: serialize TestSetPageHWPoison with zone->lock Message-ID: <20260609165829-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20260609111020.e88f51a7b6ebc37360d66fdc@linux-foundation.org> <8c1f468e-b50a-487a-a267-8d1ea5a61c87@kernel.org> <38C84F23-E881-4DB2-86BA-93F39D44AE1B@nvidia.com> <20260609162437-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <4BA276D9-9EB9-4E2A-8A05-657ACACFF227@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA276D9-9EB9-4E2A-8A05-657ACACFF227@nvidia.com> On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 04:54:01PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote: > On 9 Jun 2026, at 16:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 02:52:47PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote: > >> On 9 Jun 2026, at 14:39, Zi Yan wrote: > >> > >>> On 9 Jun 2026, at 14:38, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 6/9/26 20:10, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 06:12:49 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> TestSetPageHWPoison() is called without zone->lock, so its atomic > >>>>>> update to page->flags can race with non-atomic flag operations > >>>>>> that run under zone->lock in the buddy allocator. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In particular, __free_pages_prepare() does: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> page->flags.f &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP; > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This non-atomic read-modify-write, while correctly excluding > >>>>>> __PG_HWPOISON from the mask, can still lose a concurrent > >>>>>> TestSetPageHWPoison if the read happens before the poison bit > >>>>>> is set and the write happens after. Will only get worse if/when > >>>>>> we add more non-atomic flag operations. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Fix by acquiring zone->lock around TestSetPageHWPoison and > >>>>>> around ClearPageHWPoison in the retry path. This > >>>>>> serializes with all buddy flag manipulation. The cost is > >>>>>> negligible: one lock/unlock in an extremely rare path > >>>>>> (hardware memory errors). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Note: SetPageHWPoison and TestClearPageHWPoison calls elsewhere > >>>>>> in this file operate on pages already removed from the buddy > >>>>>> allocator or on non-buddy pages (DAX, hugetlb), so they do not > >>>>>> need zone->lock protection. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sashiko is saying this doesn't do anything "Because > >>>>> __free_pages_prepare() executes entirely locklessly". Did it goof? > >>>>> > >>>>> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/df06b66fe4ff8e925ee0714955abc2183a727b90.1780998980.git.mst@redhat.com > >>>> > >>>> Battle of the bots: it's right. > >>> > >>> Yep, __free_pages_prepare() changes the page flag without holding > >>> zone->lock. > >> > >> __free_pages_prepare() works on frozen pages and assumes no one else > >> touches the input page. To avoid this race, memory_failure() might > >> want to try_get_page() before TestClearPageHWPoison(), but I am not > >> sure if that works along with memory failure flow. > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Yan, Zi > > > > > > > > Actually memory failure already plays with this down the road no? > > > > So maybe it's enough to just SetPageHWPoison afterwards again? > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c > > index ee42d4361309..4758fea94a96 100644 > > --- a/mm/memory-failure.c > > +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c > > @@ -2415,6 +2415,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags) > > if (!res) { > > if (is_free_buddy_page(p)) { > > if (take_page_off_buddy(p)) { > > + SetPageHWPoison(p); > > page_ref_inc(p); > > res = MF_RECOVERED; > > } else { > > > > > > and maybe in a bunch of other places in there? > > You mean for fear of losing HWPoison flag in the earlier TestSetPageHWPoison(), > just set it again here? Yea. > Why not do it after get_hwpoison_page(), since that > is the expected page flag? It's still in the buddy at that point right? I'm worried buddy might poke at flags. > Miaohe probably can give a better answer here. > > > Best Regards, > Yan, Zi