The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/12] bpf: Disallow interpreter fallback for BPF_ADDR_PERCPU insn
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:26:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615152646.27639-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615152646.27639-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

Since interpreter is unable to handle the 'insn_is_mov_percpu_addr()' insn,
require JIT in __bpf_prog_select_runtime() when the prog has the insn.

BTW, rename the helper bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags() to
bpf_map_is_percpu_map().

Fixes: 7bdbf7446305 ("bpf: add special internal-only MOV instruction to resolve per-CPU addrs")
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++--
 kernel/bpf/core.c   | 1 +
 kernel/bpf/fixups.c | 5 +++++
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 5f48a6ab8a1a..24ab17a25046 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1781,6 +1781,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
 	bool might_sleep;
 	bool kprobe_write_ctx;
 	bool has_addr_space_cast_insn;
+	bool has_addr_percpu_insn;
 	struct {
 		s32 keyring_serial;
 		u8 keyring_type;
@@ -4167,7 +4168,7 @@ bpf_prog_update_insn_ptrs(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 *offsets, void *image)
 }
 #endif
 
-static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
+static inline bool bpf_map_is_percpu_map(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
 {
 	switch (map_type) {
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
@@ -4194,7 +4195,7 @@ static inline int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 all
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) {
-		if (!bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(map->map_type))
+		if (!bpf_map_is_percpu_map(map->map_type))
 			return -EINVAL;
 		if ((flags & BPF_F_CPU) && (flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
 			return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 49398b5bd172..69203d58e0ad 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -2621,6 +2621,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *__bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) ||
 	    fp->aux->has_addr_space_cast_insn ||
+	    fp->aux->has_addr_percpu_insn ||
 	    bpf_prog_has_kfunc_call(fp))
 		jit_needed = true;
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
index 2d5958774b61..9552ddcf6936 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
@@ -2009,6 +2009,9 @@ int bpf_do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 					return -EFAULT;
 				}
 
+				if (bpf_map_is_percpu_map(map_ptr->map_type))
+					prog->aux->has_addr_percpu_insn = true;
+
 				new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta,
 							       insn_buf, cnt);
 				if (!new_prog)
@@ -2113,6 +2116,7 @@ int bpf_do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			 * way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
 			 */
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+			prog->aux->has_addr_percpu_insn = true;
 			insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&cpu_number);
 			insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
 			insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
@@ -2134,6 +2138,7 @@ int bpf_do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		/* Implement bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() inline. */
 		if ((insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_current_task || insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_current_task_btf) &&
 		    bpf_verifier_inlines_helper_call(env, insn->imm)) {
+			prog->aux->has_addr_percpu_insn = true;
 			insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&current_task);
 			insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
 			insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-15 15:26 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/12] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/12] bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/12] bpf: Disallow interpreter fallback for user BPF_ADDR_SPACE_CAST insn Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 15:26 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/12] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/12] libbpf: Probe percpu data feature Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/12] libbpf: Add support for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/12] bpftool: Generate skeleton " Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify " Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/12] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify accessing rdonly percpu_array Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify verifier log for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/12] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify xlated insns " Leon Hwang
2026-06-15 21:29   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-15 15:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify bpf_iter " Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260615152646.27639-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox