The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add robust bounds-checking and safe address handling
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:48:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616114855.GD2990@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajEzQDcuDAG_mHaS@ashevche-desk.local>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 02:28:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 06:42:34AM -0400, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:26:06 +0200, Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> said:
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 02:54:02AM -0700, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:52:57 +0200, Mika Westerberg
> > >> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> said:
> > >> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 05:42:02PM +0200, Marco Scardovi wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The series adds explicit bounds checking for GPIO pin accesses and
> > >> >> ensures safe handling of ACPI addresses in OperationRegion handlers,
> > >> >> without referring to truncation or wrap-around behavior, which does
> > >> >> not apply.
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm fine with these now.
> > >> >
> > >> > For both,
> > >> >
> > >> > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > >>
> > >> Andy, Mika: do you want me to queue these directly for v7.2?
> > >
> > > I believe there is no hurry, but I have no objections if you pull it in.
> > 
> > Your call, if you thknk these should wait until v7.3, I'll leave them for now.
> 
> For the full consensus we need Mika's opinion :-)

If we can get these for v7.2-rc2+ or so that would be good enough IMHO.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-10 15:42 [PATCH v6 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add robust bounds-checking and safe address handling Marco Scardovi
2026-06-10 15:42 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add robust bounds-checking for GPIO pin resources Marco Scardovi
2026-06-10 15:42 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] gpiolib: acpi: Prevent out-of-bounds pin access in OperationRegion handler Marco Scardovi
2026-06-12  8:52 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add robust bounds-checking and safe address handling Mika Westerberg
2026-06-16  9:54   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-06-16 10:26     ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-16 10:42       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-06-16 11:28         ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-16 11:48           ` Mika Westerberg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260616114855.GD2990@black.igk.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scardracs@disroot.org \
    --cc=westeri@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox