From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: "Adrián Larumbe" <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>,
"Marty E. Plummer" <hanetzer@startmail.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>,
Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Collabora Kernel Team <kernel@collabora.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/panfrost: Fix PM usage_count mishandling
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 16:55:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617165546.4777de33@fedora-2.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajGpN5x-SnC9y6pa@sobremesa>
On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 21:17:53 +0100
Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com> wrote:
> On 04.06.2026 20:36, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Jun 2026 18:35:25 +0100
> > Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com> wrote:
> >
> > > During device probe(), failure to do a PM get() will leave the usage_count
> > > set to 0, which is the value assigned at device creation time. That means
> > > when the autosuspend delay expires, runtime suspend callback won't be
> > > invoked, so the device will remain powered on forever.
> > >
> > > On top of that, failure to call PM put() during device unplug means
> > > Panfrost device's PM usage_count increases monotonically for every new
> > > module reload.
> > >
> > > The combined outcome of both of the above was that devfreq OPP transition
> > > notifications would be printed all the time, even when no jobs are being
> > > submitted. This quickly fills the kernel ring buffer with junk.
> > >
> > > Even direr than that was the fact MMU interrupts are only enabled when
> > > the device is reset, so after device probe() the very first job targeting
> > > the tiler heap BO would always time out, because the driver's PM runtime
> > > resume callback would not be invoked.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>
> > > Fixes: 635430797d3f ("drm/panfrost: Rework runtime PM initialization")
> > > Fixes: 876b15d2c88d ("drm/panfrost: Fix module unload")
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c | 6 +++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
> > > index 2d4b6aa95c66..545fbf2c8d0c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
> > > @@ -989,6 +989,7 @@ static int panfrost_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > pm_runtime_set_active(pfdev->base.dev);
> > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(pfdev->base.dev);
> > > pm_runtime_enable(pfdev->base.dev);
> > > + pm_runtime_get_noresume(pfdev->base.dev);
> > > pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(pfdev->base.dev, 50); /* ~3 frames */
> > > pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(pfdev->base.dev);
> > >
> > > @@ -1000,10 +1001,12 @@ static int panfrost_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > if (err < 0)
> > > goto err_out1;
> > >
> > > + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pfdev->base.dev);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > err_out1:
> > > + pm_runtime_put_noidle(pfdev->base.dev);
> >
> > Do we really need this get_noresume/put_noidle dance, can't use call
> > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() instead like is done in panthor, or
> > is panthor broken too?
>
> We need get_noresume() because after panfrost_device_init(), the device is powered
> up but that is not reflected in the device's PM refcnt. Then pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()
> will decrement the refcnt back to 0 and let the autosuspend window expire before
> suspending the device, unless someone starts using it immediately.
That's more or less what I'm questioning. Can't we make it so
panfrost_clk_init() doesn't call clk_prepare_enable() on its clks, and
then have a pm_runtime_resume_and_get() in panfrost_device_init() just
before we start interacting with the HW components (so basically before
panfrost_gpu_init()). Then you don't need this
get_noresume/put_noidle() dance, because the init path is just
considered like any other path that needs to interact with the HW.
>
> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() is not mandatory if we manually call pm_runtime_disable()
> at device unplug time or when probe() fails. pm_runtime_use_autosuspend()'s docs say:
>
> pm_runtime_use_autosuspend - Allow autosuspend to be used for a device.
> @dev: Target device.
> Allow the runtime PM autosuspend mechanism to be used for @dev whenever
> requested (or "autosuspend" will be handled as direct runtime-suspend for
> it).
> NOTE: It's important to undo this with pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend()
> at driver exit time unless your driver initially enabled pm_runtime
> with devm_pm_runtime_enable() (which handles it for you).
>
> Panthor uses devm_pm_runtime_enable(), which makes me suspect perhaps it doesn't need
> to explicitly call pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend().
Yep, devm_pm_runtime_enable() takes care of that, indeed.
>
> Panthor also manages PM refcnt fine at driver probe(), inside panthor_device_init():
>
> ``` c
> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ptdev->base.dev);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> /* If PM is disabled, we need to call panthor_device_resume() manually. */
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM)) {
> ret = panthor_device_resume(ptdev->base.dev);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> ```
>
> If we want a similar thing in Panfrost, then we should move all clock and devfreq enablement
> into panfrost_device_runtime_resume() and do pm_runtime_resume_and_get() right before
> panfrost_gpu_init().
This ^. You probably want to keep clk_prepare() in the clk_init() path,
since resume/suspend() only enable/disable the clks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 17:35 [PATCH v2 0/7] RPM, perfcnt and other minor fixes for Panfrost Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-04 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/panfrost: Check another bo field for cache option query Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-04 17:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-06-05 10:29 ` Steven Price
2026-06-04 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/panfrost: Prevent division by 0 Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-04 18:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-06-05 10:29 ` Steven Price
2026-06-16 18:43 ` Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-04 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/panfrost: Move shrinker initialization and unplug one level down Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-04 18:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-06-16 18:53 ` Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-04 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/panfrost: Move perfcnt GPU disable sequence into a helper Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-04 18:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-06-05 10:34 ` Steven Price
2026-06-04 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/panfrost: Make reset sequence deal with an active HWPerf session Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-04 18:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-06-05 10:41 ` Steven Price
2026-06-16 19:15 ` Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-16 22:39 ` Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-17 14:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-06-04 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/panfrost: Fix PM usage_count mishandling Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-04 18:36 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-06-16 20:17 ` Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-17 14:55 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2026-06-05 10:48 ` Steven Price
2026-06-16 19:48 ` Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-04 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/panfrost: Explicitly enable MMU interrupts at device init Adrián Larumbe
2026-06-05 6:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-06-16 19:15 ` Adrián Larumbe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617165546.4777de33@fedora-2.home \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=adrian.larumbe@collabora.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=faith.ekstrand@collabora.com \
--cc=hanetzer@startmail.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox