From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xor/kunit: add a benchmark
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 17:14:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617171448.GD785086@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617054416.3841334-3-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 07:44:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/raid/xor/tests/xor_kunit.c b/lib/raid/xor/tests/xor_kunit.c
> index 659ae3edbc25..5939b78b3944 100644
> --- a/lib/raid/xor/tests/xor_kunit.c
> +++ b/lib/raid/xor/tests/xor_kunit.c
> @@ -125,8 +125,71 @@ static void xor_test(struct kunit *test)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XOR_BENCHMARK
> +static void xor_benchmark(struct kunit *test)
The #ifdef can be avoided using kunit_skip(), as the crypto and CRC
tests do:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XOR_BENCHMARK))
kunit_skip(test, "not enabled");
> + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(len_to_test); j++) {
> + unsigned int len = len_to_test[j];
> + const unsigned long num_iters = 1000;
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, len, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_LE(test, len, XOR_KUNIT_MAX_BYTES);
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + t = ktime_get();
> + for (l = 0; l < num_iters; l++)
> + xor_gen(test_dest, test_buffers, nr, len);
> + t = ktime_get_ns() - t;
> + preempt_enable();
First one should be ktime_get_ns(), not ktime_get().
> +
> + speed[j] = div_u64((u64)len * num_iters * nr, t);
> + }
> +
> + static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(len_to_test) == 2);
> + kunit_info(test, "%3u disks:\t%5llu GB/s\t%5llu GB/s\n",
> + nr, speed[0], speed[1]);
As mentioned in the other thread, this measures the speed at which the
source data is consumed, which differs from the code in
lib/raid/xor/xor-core.c that measures the speed at which the destination
data is produced. Probably best to make them consistent.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 5:44 xor: add a kunit benchmark Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-17 5:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] xor/kunit: fix a spelling error Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-17 5:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] xor/kunit: add a benchmark Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-17 17:14 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617171448.GD785086@google.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox