From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zystor.com,
samitolvanen@google.com, kees@kernel.org,
scott.d.constable@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kcfi: Optimize call sequence
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:37:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617223728.GA3913972@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612071506.GQ187714@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 09:15:06AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> As noted in commit 85a2d4a890dc ("x86,ibt: Use UDB instead of 0xEA") Jcc should
> be assumed not-taken, however the normal kCFI (ABI) emits the following sequence:
>
> movl $(-hash), %r10d
> addl -15(%r11), %r10d
> je 1f
> ud2
> 1: cs call __x86_indirect_thunk_r11
>
> (when used in conjunction with -mretpoline-external-thunk).
>
> Notably, the Jcc here is always taken, resulting in lower throughput than would
> be ideal. Replace it with the following sequence on boot:
>
> movl $(-hash), %r10d
> addl -15(%r11), %r10d
> jne . + 3
> test $0xd6, %al
> cs call __x86_indirect_thunk_r11
>
> This jumps to the UDB instruction used as an immediate byte in the test
> instruction. The test instruction will clobber eflags, but that is immaterial,
> eflags is already changed by the preceding addl.
>
> Intel recommends the FineIBT sequence on platforms that support IBT; older
> platforms are still widely used and would benefit from this.
>
> An earlier PoC was benchmarked by Scott:
>
> Indirect branch miss rate (br_misp_retired.indirect:k / br_inst_retired.indirect:k)
>
> BHI_DIS_S=1
>
> Benchmark Baseline IBT kCFI kCFI-opt
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> iperf3 UDP 0.103764 0.103180 0.104311 0.102945
> hackbench 0.000885 0.000876 0.001996 0.000826
> lmbench syscall 0.005089 0.004486 0.016990 0.005852
> lmbench fork+exit 0.018454 0.019176 0.031085 0.015153
> lmbench fork+exec 0.017147 0.021613 0.029129 0.016337
> redis 0.032220 0.032655 0.045540 0.027946
> nginx+wrk 0.109033 0.112765 0.132557 0.102417
> fio randread 0.009704 0.009620 0.008548 0.000962
> fio seqwrite 0.006927 0.006707 0.019372 0.004590
> kbuild 0.056748 0.057324 0.064640 0.048136
>
> BHI_DIS_S=0
>
> Benchmark Baseline IBT kCFI kCFI-opt
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> iperf3 UDP 0.000077 0.000106 0.000186 0.000073
> hackbench 0.000123 0.000132 0.000367 0.000097
> lmbench syscall 0.023259 0.018319 0.040903 0.012772
> lmbench fork+exit 0.011494 0.011887 0.029079 0.016415
> lmbench fork+exec 0.037782 0.038994 0.055378 0.026381
> redis 0.002481 0.003152 0.017073 0.000184
> nginx+wrk 0.015478 0.016266 0.033637 0.000268
> fio randread 0.009836 0.007949 0.007096 0.000143
> fio seqwrite 0.014587 0.014165 0.041792 0.002157
> kbuild 0.055774 0.055249 0.062590 0.046546
>
> Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Cc: hpa@zystor.com
> Suggested-by: Scott D Constable <scott.d.constable@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
I booted this on two machines without IBT (so using kCFI by default)
without any issues. lkdtm's CFI_FORWARD_PROTO test case still fails for
me and I can see the d6 immediate in the stacktrace.
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cfi.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -1356,6 +1356,10 @@ early_param("cfi", cfi_parse_cmdline);
> * "Make conditional jumps most often not taken: The efficiency and throughput
> * for not-taken branches is better than for taken branches on most
> * processors. Therefore, it is good to place the most frequent branch first"
> + *
> + * NOTE: Update the kCFI caller sequence to make use of this observation.
> + * Replace the "je 1f; ud2" sequence with "jne +1; test $0xd6, %al". This
> + * clobbers flags, but those are clobbered by the hash test anyway.
> */
>
> /*
> @@ -1518,9 +1522,10 @@ static int cfi_disable_callers(s32 *star
> static int cfi_enable_callers(s32 *start, s32 *end)
> {
> /*
> - * Re-enable kCFI, undo what cfi_disable_callers() did.
> + * Re-enable (and update) kCFI, undo what cfi_disable_callers() did.
> */
> const u8 mov[] = { 0x41, 0xba };
> + const u8 udne[] = { 0x75, 0x01, 0xa8, 0xd6 };
> s32 *s;
>
> for (s = start; s < end; s++) {
> @@ -1532,6 +1537,10 @@ static int cfi_enable_callers(s32 *start
> if (!hash) /* nocfi callers */
> continue;
>
> + /*
> + * See the kCFI/FineIBT comment above -- update note.
> + */
> + text_poke_early(addr + 10, udne, 4);
> text_poke_early(addr, mov, 2);
> }
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cfi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cfi.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,12 @@ enum bug_trap_type handle_cfi_failure(st
>
> switch (cfi_mode) {
> case CFI_KCFI:
> + /*
> + * The updated kCFI sequence has "test $0xd6, %al" instead of
> + * "ud2", adjust the offset.
> + */
> + addr -= 1;
> +
> if (!is_cfi_trap(addr))
> return BUG_TRAP_TYPE_NONE;
>
--
Cheers,
Nathan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 7:15 [PATCH] x86/kcfi: Optimize call sequence Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-16 18:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-16 20:47 ` David Laight
2026-06-17 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-17 9:26 ` David Laight
2026-06-17 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-17 12:36 ` David Laight
2026-06-17 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-17 22:37 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617223728.GA3913972@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zystor.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=scott.d.constable@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox