From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25CE1234994;
	Sun, 21 Jun 2026 21:49:09 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1782078551; cv=none; b=lv1KqXg1ar03hxwCfYaFQNZRcY8NRwkMIiZXZ37dIIqJTe96dhyq4zcIIYjICeST0uB0BZ9QTwLx5mM/vy1pw20vQY8kdwvxvInVpkZlwvA1GL4MAocyuPNDdDqfo68tnzZZGuYkCs7FHpKUOoPR3TK68k4dueyPBUrHccx78cg=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1782078551; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=WIddReOZChlERcVaOaVvebYBg3ZsadYURfVxRnWYHY0=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FZWaaL9qWMJdBPRIUruR2V7zSZ2CkCd5t7d2e10G1xmKv1ZTzkOneXzQqQ6DNzTAS0eToDP+tY1D/368iMuLIxuha5j4s3FLHOefRrdyrW3oBz4lCCrsdbGuHQ5mDpLEUSPmmPTBTBFtBZ1S72bqDBCzM8d6/UWi8M1GWV8S8e4=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QCGfnKu+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QCGfnKu+"
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36E021F000E9;
	Sun, 21 Jun 2026 21:49:09 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20260515; t=1782078549;
	bh=UC/wlLNOwM17JvX56rcj33cHQNR9C3l/TAkqUHzdQvk=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
	b=QCGfnKu+1DSb6/coD3QRvS7fBFRzexCbIM7QE2zttcatDjoVJWsO1krXKITsQar6N
	 Ph78OcvY2NggsO5vgW3xJl/n2pzfNsMD2bw6vSiIVoyZtiSoVP44Q9AQttAc1VXfHI
	 nA+jJ/vYOqywIv2loRaLhHsqxHFRlAJIjK3SSDBCQyv0z/ZDANka9bI5NcsV0T2tC8
	 vrsaAfMaD5SdN6jabcQjriR5anGBIxQi+z7wmQPTvFoy2uldtLZr+WrhQVP0hi1GQc
	 pv5St5H9uA89QCFcIr9DFbWSzx+4/C7Kp56/l4plmSTnbzHzjkCFblaY3S52OI7RU8
	 pRlni6UV1Hx1Q==
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 14:49:08 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>,
 <pabeni@redhat.com>, <sgoutham@marvell.com>, <gakula@marvell.com>,
 <bbhushan2@marvell.com>, <rkannoth@marvell.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net PATCH v3] octeontx2-af: Validate NIX maximum LFs correctly
Message-ID: <20260621144908.1826b8ed@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1781710853-23420-1-git-send-email-sbhatta@marvell.com>
References: <1781710853-23420-1-git-send-email-sbhatta@marvell.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 17 Jun 2026 21:10:53 +0530 Subbaraya Sundeep wrote:
> NIX maximum number of LFs can be set via devlink command
> but that can be done before assigning any LFs to a PF/VF.
> The condition used to check whether any LFs are assigned is
> incorrect. This patch fixes that condition.

Does not apply, please rebase & repost.
-- 
pw-bot: cr