From: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] net: pse-pd: scope pse_control regulator handle to kref lifetime
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 22:40:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624204017.2752934-1-github@szelinsky.de> (raw)
From: Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>
__pse_control_release() drops psec->ps via devm_regulator_put(), which
only succeeds if the devres entry added by the matching
devm_regulator_get_exclusive() is still present on pcdev->dev at the
time the pse_control's kref hits zero.
That assumption does not hold when the controller is unbound while a
pse_control still has consumers: pcdev->dev's devres list is released
LIFO, so every per-attach regulator-GET devres runs (and
regulator_put()s the underlying regulator) before
pse_controller_unregister() itself is invoked. Any later
pse_control_put() from that unbind path then reads psec->ps as a
dangling pointer inside devm_regulator_put() and WARNs at
drivers/regulator/devres.c:232 (devres_release() fails to find the
already-released match).
The pse_control's consumer handle is logically scoped to the
pse_control's refcount, not to pcdev->dev's devres lifetime. Switch to
the plain regulator_get_exclusive() / regulator_put() pair so the
regulator put in __pse_control_release() no longer depends on the
controller's devres still being present. No change to the
regulator-framework-visible refcount or lifetime of the underlying
regulator: a single get paired with a single put. The existing
devm_regulator_register() for the per-PI rails is unchanged (those ARE
correctly scoped to the controller's lifetime).
This addresses only the regulator handle. The same unbind-while-held
scenario also leaves __pse_control_release() reading psec->pcdev->pi[]
and psec->pcdev->owner after pse_controller_unregister() has freed
pcdev->pi, because the controller does not drain its outstanding
pse_control references on unregister. That wider pse_control vs
pcdev lifetime problem pre-dates this change and is addressed by the
PSE controller notifier series, which drains phydev->psec on
PSE_UNREGISTERED before pcdev->pi is freed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260620112440.1734404-1-github@szelinsky.de/
Fixes: d83e13761d5b ("net: pse-pd: Use regulator framework within PSE framework")
Signed-off-by: Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>
Acked-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
---
This is patch 1 of the "decouple controller lookup from MDIO probe"
series, reposted on its own for net as Jakub suggested. The rest of the
series targets net-next and is deferred until it reopens.
Changes in v2:
- Reword the commit message to scope the fix to the regulator handle.
As Simon's review pointed out, the same unbind-while-held path also
reads pcdev->pi[] and pcdev->owner after pse_release_pis(); that wider
pse_control vs pcdev lifetime issue is fixed by the notifier series,
not here. No code change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260624151251.1137250-1-horms@kernel.org/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260622192839.2508733-1-github@szelinsky.de/
---
drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
index 69dbdbde9d71..a5e6d7b26b9f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ static void __pse_control_release(struct kref *kref)
if (psec->pcdev->pi[psec->id].admin_state_enabled)
regulator_disable(psec->ps);
- devm_regulator_put(psec->ps);
+ regulator_put(psec->ps);
module_put(psec->pcdev->owner);
@@ -1436,8 +1436,8 @@ pse_control_get_internal(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev, unsigned int index,
goto free_psec;
pcdev->pi[index].admin_state_enabled = ret;
- psec->ps = devm_regulator_get_exclusive(pcdev->dev,
- rdev_get_name(pcdev->pi[index].rdev));
+ psec->ps = regulator_get_exclusive(pcdev->dev,
+ rdev_get_name(pcdev->pi[index].rdev));
if (IS_ERR(psec->ps)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(psec->ps);
goto put_module;
base-commit: d87363b0edfc7504ff2b144fe4cdd8154f90f42e
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260624204017.2752934-1-github@szelinsky.de \
--to=github@szelinsky.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corey@leavitt.info \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox