From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
ziqianlu@bytedance.com, tj@kernel.org, williams@redhat.com,
jkacur@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/core: Allow newidle for core-sched
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:42:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625124213.GX42921@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2acc7f1-f119-4707-b10f-52e9b6ad0b49@amd.com>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 05:26:03AM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> ... or we can return a RETRY_TASK when newidle balance succeeds too to
> force a core-wide pick when core scheduling is enabled like:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 0d212bf04885..e393aed58bfa 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9946,8 +9946,16 @@ struct task_struct *pick_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
> if (rq_modified_above(rq, &fair_sched_class))
> return RETRY_TASK;
>
> - if (cfs_rq->nr_queued)
> + if (cfs_rq->nr_queued) {
> + /*
> + * Force a core-wide pick if newidle
> + * balance managed to pull a task since
> + * the lock was dropped.
> + */
> + if (sched_core_enabled(rq))
> + return RETRY_TASK;
> goto again;
> + }
>
> return NULL;
> }
This has forward progress issues. You can ping-pong he one task back and
forth and never actually pick anything.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 12:13 [PATCH 0/2] sched: Remove sched_class::balance() Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/core: Allow newidle for core-sched Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-24 23:56 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-25 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-25 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Remove sched_class::balance() Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Aaron Lu
2026-07-03 3:31 ` K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260625124213.GX42921@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox