The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Farhad Alemi" <farhad.alemi@berkeley.edu>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
	Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
	Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent race between task attach and cpuset state change
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 14:19:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626181923.133658-4-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626181923.133658-1-longman@redhat.com>

Commit e44193d39e8d ("cpuset: let hotplug propagation work wait for
task attaching") was introduced to let hotplug operation to wait
until the completion of task attach operation. However, it is still
possible that the states of the source or destination cpuset can
be changed between the cpuset_can_attach() call and the subsequent
cpuset_attach()/cpuset_cacnel_attach() call.

As a result, data gathered during cpuset_can_attach() cannot be reliably
used in the subsequent cpuset_attach()/cpuset_cacnel_attach()
call at all. Make the task attach operation more robust
and allow the sharing of data between cpuset_can_attach() and
cpuset_attach()/cpuset_cacnel_attach() by making cpuset_write_resmask()
and cpuset_partition_write() wait for the completion of task attach
as well.

Ideally, an ongoing task attach operation should block any cpuset write
operation that can change its internal state until the operation is
completed. However, the attach_in_progress flag is currently per cpuset
and only the destination cpuset will have this flag set. The flag is not
set in the source cpuset where the tasks will be moved from. Even if we
extend the scope to include the source cpuset, it will not block cpuset
operation that changes the state of one of its ancestor cpuset which may
indirectly impact the state of the source or destination cpuset. It may
be too costly to set the flag for the whole subtree, it is far easier
to just make the flag global and block all the cpuset write operation
whenever a task attach operation is in progress. Make that change by
creating a new cpuset attach context (attach_ctx) structure to hold the
global in_progress flag and use it for blocking cpuset write operation
if a cpuset attach operation is in progress.

The comments about validate_change() are no longer valid as it won't
be called at all if an attach operation is in progress. So the comments
can be removed.

The per-cpuset attach_in_progress flag is also currently used in
partition_is_populated() and cpuset_is_populated() to determine if
an empty cpuset will have incoming task. This check will no longer be
needed as this function will not be called when there is a task attach
in progress. So the flag check is now removed.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h | 11 +-----
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c          | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h
index f7aaf01f7cd5..817b86ba7019 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h
@@ -145,12 +145,6 @@ struct cpuset {
 	 */
 	nodemask_t old_mems_allowed;
 
-	/*
-	 * Tasks are being attached to this cpuset.  Used to prevent
-	 * zeroing cpus/mems_allowed between ->can_attach() and ->attach().
-	 */
-	int attach_in_progress;
-
 	/* partition root state */
 	int partition_root_state;
 
@@ -269,10 +263,7 @@ static inline int nr_cpusets(void)
 static inline bool cpuset_is_populated(struct cpuset *cs)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_cpuset_lock_held();
-
-	/* Cpusets in the process of attaching should be considered as populated */
-	return cgroup_is_populated(cs->css.cgroup) ||
-		cs->attach_in_progress;
+	return cgroup_is_populated(cs->css.cgroup);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index d108c2083e86..dec9785d0271 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -356,6 +356,14 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *cpuset_migrate_mm_wq;
 
 static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(cpuset_attach_wq);
 
+/*
+ * Cpuset task attach context
+ * Protected by cpuset_mutex
+ */
+static struct {
+	int in_progress;
+} attach_ctx;
+
 static inline void check_insane_mems_config(nodemask_t *nodes)
 {
 	if (!cpusets_insane_config() &&
@@ -368,22 +376,22 @@ static inline void check_insane_mems_config(nodemask_t *nodes)
 }
 
 /*
- * decrease cs->attach_in_progress.
- * wake_up cpuset_attach_wq if cs->attach_in_progress==0.
+ * decrease attach_ctx.in_progress.
+ * wake_up cpuset_attach_wq if attach_ctx.in_progress==0.
  */
-static inline void dec_attach_in_progress_locked(struct cpuset *cs)
+static inline void dec_attach_in_progress_locked(void)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_cpuset_lock_held();
 
-	cs->attach_in_progress--;
-	if (!cs->attach_in_progress)
+	attach_ctx.in_progress--;
+	if (!attach_ctx.in_progress)
 		wake_up(&cpuset_attach_wq);
 }
 
-static inline void dec_attach_in_progress(struct cpuset *cs)
+static inline void dec_attach_in_progress(void)
 {
 	mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
-	dec_attach_in_progress_locked(cs);
+	dec_attach_in_progress_locked();
 	mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
 }
 
@@ -432,8 +440,7 @@ static inline bool partition_is_populated(struct cpuset *cs,
 	 * nr_populated_domain_children may include populated
 	 * csets from descendants that are partitions.
 	 */
-	if (cgroup_has_tasks(cs->css.cgroup) ||
-	    cs->attach_in_progress)
+	if (cgroup_has_tasks(cs->css.cgroup))
 		return true;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
@@ -3091,11 +3098,7 @@ static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
 	cs->dl_bw_cpu = cpu;
 
 out_success:
-	/*
-	 * Mark attach is in progress.  This makes validate_change() fail
-	 * changes which zero cpus/mems_allowed.
-	 */
-	cs->attach_in_progress++;
+	attach_ctx.in_progress++;
 
 out_unlock:
 	if (ret)
@@ -3113,7 +3116,7 @@ static void cpuset_cancel_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
 	cs = css_cs(css);
 
 	mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
-	dec_attach_in_progress_locked(cs);
+	dec_attach_in_progress_locked();
 
 	if (cs->dl_bw_cpu >= 0)
 		dl_bw_free(cs->dl_bw_cpu, cs->sum_migrate_dl_bw);
@@ -3226,7 +3229,7 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
 		reset_migrate_dl_data(cs);
 	}
 
-	dec_attach_in_progress_locked(cs);
+	dec_attach_in_progress_locked();
 
 	mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
 }
@@ -3246,10 +3249,19 @@ ssize_t cpuset_write_resmask(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
 		return -EACCES;
 
 	buf = strstrip(buf);
+retry:
+	wait_event(cpuset_attach_wq, attach_ctx.in_progress == 0);
+
 	cpuset_full_lock();
 	if (!is_cpuset_online(cs))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
+	/* Don't race with task attach */
+	if (attach_ctx.in_progress) {
+		cpuset_full_unlock();
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
 	trialcs = dup_or_alloc_cpuset(cs);
 	if (!trialcs) {
 		retval = -ENOMEM;
@@ -3377,7 +3389,17 @@ static ssize_t cpuset_partition_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
 	else
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+retry:
+	wait_event(cpuset_attach_wq, attach_ctx.in_progress == 0);
+
 	cpuset_full_lock();
+
+	/* Don't race with task attach */
+	if (attach_ctx.in_progress) {
+		cpuset_full_unlock();
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
 	if (is_cpuset_online(cs))
 		retval = update_prstate(cs, val);
 	cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock();
@@ -3616,11 +3638,7 @@ static int cpuset_can_fork(struct task_struct *task, struct css_set *cset)
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	/*
-	 * Mark attach is in progress.  This makes validate_change() fail
-	 * changes which zero cpus/mems_allowed.
-	 */
-	cs->attach_in_progress++;
+	attach_ctx.in_progress++;
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
 	return ret;
@@ -3638,7 +3656,7 @@ static void cpuset_cancel_fork(struct task_struct *task, struct css_set *cset)
 	if (same_cs)
 		return;
 
-	dec_attach_in_progress(cs);
+	dec_attach_in_progress();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3670,7 +3688,7 @@ static void cpuset_fork(struct task_struct *task)
 	guarantee_online_mems(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
 	cpuset_attach_task(cs, task);
 
-	dec_attach_in_progress_locked(cs);
+	dec_attach_in_progress_locked();
 	mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
 }
 
@@ -3775,7 +3793,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 	int partcmd = -1;
 	struct cpuset *parent;
 retry:
-	wait_event(cpuset_attach_wq, cs->attach_in_progress == 0);
+	wait_event(cpuset_attach_wq, attach_ctx.in_progress == 0);
 
 	mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
 
@@ -3783,7 +3801,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 	 * We have raced with task attaching. We wait until attaching
 	 * is finished, so we won't attach a task to an empty cpuset.
 	 */
-	if (cs->attach_in_progress) {
+	if (attach_ctx.in_progress) {
 		mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
 		goto retry;
 	}
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-26 18:19 [PATCH v8 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source/destination cpusets for cpuset_*attach() Waiman Long
2026-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] cgroup/cpuset: rebind mm mempolicy to effective_mems, not mems_allowed Waiman Long
2026-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] cgroup/cpuset: Fix node inconsistencies between cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask() and cpuset_attach() Waiman Long
2026-06-26 18:19 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-06-29  7:14   ` [PATCH v8 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent race between task attach and cpuset state change Ridong Chen
2026-06-29 21:53     ` Waiman Long
2026-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] cgroup/cpuset: Put all task attach related variables into attach_ctx Waiman Long
2026-06-29  7:16   ` Ridong Chen
2026-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] cgroup/cpuset: Add a cpuset_reserve_dl_bw() helper Waiman Long
2026-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] cgroup/cpuset: Expand the scope of cpuset_can_attach_check() Waiman Long
2026-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] cgroup/cpuset: Make attach_ctx.old_cs track task group leader Waiman Long
2026-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] cgroup/cpuset: Move mpol_rebind_mm/cpuset_migrate_mm() calls inside cpuset_attach_task() Waiman Long
2026-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source cpusets for cpuset_*attach() Waiman Long
2026-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple destination " Waiman Long
2026-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] selftests/cgroup: Add test for cpuset affinity on controller disable Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260626181923.133658-4-longman@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=farhad.alemi@berkeley.edu \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox