From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ljs@kernel.org, riel@surriel.com,
liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, harry@kernel.org,
jannh@google.com, ziy@nvidia.com, sj@kernel.org,
balbirs@nvidia.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [Patch mm-hotfixes v4] mm/page_vma_mapped: fix device-private PMD handling
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 02:07:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260627020719.ipzfrlhfbvr6ac35@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d060cadd-34f8-42da-b7f7-c8d295050436@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 12:07:56PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>On 6/24/26 08:53, Wei Yang wrote:
[...]
>
>This is extremely hard to review given the existing crap handling here. I'm
>really sorry, but it makes my head hurt (I'm not kidding :) ).
>
>It's completely unclear why we only have to check for a subset of the cases
>after taking the lock.
>
>Could we simply extend the existing migration pmd handling and leave the
>!pmd_present() case for pmd_none()?
>
>That leaves no question to "which transitions are actually allowed", including
>"could we accidentally assume something is a page table when really it isn't".
>
>
>So what about something like the following?
>
>The "thp_migration_supported()" is not required when checking for
>pmd_is_migration_entry(), as that defaults to "false" when not compiled in.
>
>Untested:
>
Hi David
I did a little adjustment like below. Want to check with you at first.
>
>>From 048ecd33673ec649e168fbbb97749a7c0e344fcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
>Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:03:40 +0200
>Subject: [PATCH] tmp
>
>Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>---
> mm/page_vma_mapped.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
>index 2ccbabfb2cc17..ed2a23a90e8dd 100644
>--- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
>+++ b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
>@@ -243,21 +243,31 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
> */
> pmde = pmdp_get_lockless(pvmw->pmd);
>
>- if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde) || pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde)) {
>+ if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde) || pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde) ||
>+ pmd_is_device_private_entry(pmde)) {
> pvmw->ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pvmw->pmd);
> pmde = *pvmw->pmd;
>- if (!pmd_present(pmde)) {
>+ if (pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde)) {
> softleaf_t entry;
>
How about:
const softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
>- if (!thp_migration_supported() ||
>- !(pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION))
>+ if (!(pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION))
> return not_found(pvmw);
> entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
could be removed.
>+ if (!check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
>+ return not_found(pvmw);
>+ return true;
>+ } else if (pmd_is_device_private_entry(pmde)) {
>+ softleaf_t entry;
The same.
>
>- if (!softleaf_is_migration(entry) ||
>- !check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
>+ if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION)
>+ return not_found(pvmw);
>+ entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
>+ if (!check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
> return not_found(pvmw);
> return true;
>+ } else if (!pmd_present(pmde) ){
>+ return not_found(pvmw);
> }
> if (likely(pmd_trans_huge(pmde))) {
> if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION)
How about merge this with above? And put at the first case?
Below is what it looks like:
if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde) || pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde) ||
pmd_is_device_private_entry(pmde)) {
pvmw->ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pvmw->pmd);
pmde = *pvmw->pmd;
if (likely(pmd_trans_huge(pmde))) {
if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION)
return not_found(pvmw);
if (!check_pmd(pmd_pfn(pmde), pvmw))
return not_found(pvmw);
return true;
} else if (pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde)) {
const softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
if (!(pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION))
return not_found(pvmw);
if (!check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
return not_found(pvmw);
return true;
} else if (pmd_is_device_private_entry(pmde)) {
const softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION)
return not_found(pvmw);
if (!check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
return not_found(pvmw);
return true;
} else if (!pmd_present(pmde)) {
return not_found(pvmw);
}
/* THP pmd was split under us: handle on pte level */
spin_unlock(pvmw->ptl);
pvmw->ptl = NULL;
} else if (!pmd_present(pmde)) {
Test with split_huge_page_test/khugepaged/hmm-test/migration in selftets,
looks good.
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-27 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 6:53 [Patch mm-hotfixes v4] mm/page_vma_mapped: fix device-private PMD handling Wei Yang
2026-06-24 8:57 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-25 9:57 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-25 10:37 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-25 11:25 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-25 11:42 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-25 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2026-06-25 13:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-25 11:12 ` Balbir Singh
2026-06-26 0:44 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-26 0:58 ` Andrew Morton
2026-06-25 19:39 ` Zi Yan
2026-06-26 10:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-26 10:42 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-26 11:31 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-26 13:24 ` Zi Yan
2026-06-26 13:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-26 13:27 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-26 13:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-27 0:38 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-27 2:51 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-27 0:04 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-27 2:07 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2026-06-27 2:59 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260627020719.ipzfrlhfbvr6ac35@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox