From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: "Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Marco Pagani" <marco.pagani@linux.dev>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] drm/sched: Avoid lock cycle for sched_entity
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:59:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701085920.3253248-5-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701085920.3253248-2-phasta@kernel.org>
Previous cleanup commits created a slightly sub-optimal lock-cycle
between the two functions drm_sched_entity_pop_job() and
drm_sched_rq_pop_entity().
Avoid the lock-cycle by moving the locking from
drm_sched_rq_pop_entity() to drm_sched_entity_pop_job(). Add the
appropriate lockdep check.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_rq.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
index 5cf0af91faf2..0fc1213a0d3f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
@@ -539,10 +539,10 @@ struct drm_sched_job *drm_sched_entity_pop_job(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
* TODO: Replace spsc_queue completely with a locked (h)list.
*/
spsc_queue_pop(&entity->job_queue);
+ drm_sched_rq_pop_entity(entity);
spin_unlock(&entity->lock);
dma_fence_put(prev_last_scheduled);
- drm_sched_rq_pop_entity(entity);
/* Jobs and entities might have different lifecycles. Since we're
* removing the job from the entities queue, set the jobs entity pointer
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_rq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_rq.c
index 044546bcb5f8..97363f9ef8bc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_rq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_rq.c
@@ -319,11 +319,12 @@ void drm_sched_rq_pop_entity(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
struct drm_sched_job *next_job;
struct drm_sched_rq *rq;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&entity->lock);
+
/*
* Update the entity's location in the min heap according to
* the timestamp of the next job, if any.
*/
- spin_lock(&entity->lock);
rq = entity->rq;
spin_lock(&rq->lock);
next_job = drm_sched_entity_queue_peek(entity);
@@ -340,7 +341,6 @@ void drm_sched_rq_pop_entity(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
drm_sched_entity_save_vruntime(entity, min_vruntime);
}
spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
- spin_unlock(&entity->lock);
}
/**
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 8:59 [PATCH 0/5] drm/sched: Introduce the miracle of locking to entity Philipp Stanner
2026-07-01 8:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/sched: Protect entity->last_scheduled with spinlock Philipp Stanner
2026-07-01 8:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/sched: Lock spsc_queue in drm_sched_entity_pop_job() Philipp Stanner
2026-07-01 8:59 ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
2026-07-01 8:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/sched: Lock drm_sched_entity_is_idle() Philipp Stanner
2026-07-01 9:47 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-07-01 8:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/sched: Remove entity->entity_idle Philipp Stanner
2026-07-01 9:38 ` Philipp Stanner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260701085920.3253248-5-phasta@kernel.org \
--to=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=marco.pagani@linux.dev \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox