The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux trace kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Add a no-rcu-check version of trace_##event##_enabled()
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 13:27:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701132744.6a7fc68b@robin> (raw)

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Tracepoints require that RCU is watching. To prevent them from being used
in places that RCU is not watching, the trace_##event() macro always
calls rcu_is_watching() even when the event is not enabled and warns if
RCU is not watching. This is to make sure a warning is triggered even if
the tracepoint is never enabled (as it is only a bug when it is).

It was noticed that tracepoints could be hidden within
trace_#event#_enabled() calls, which are used to do extra work for the
tracepoint only if the tracepoint is enabled. But this also can hide the
fact that a tracepoint is placed in a location that can be called when RCU
is not watching.

Commit 9764e731ef6ab ("tracepoint: Add lockdep rcu_is_watching() check to
trace_##name##_enabled()") added a check to the trace_##event##_enabled()
macro to make sure RCU is watching when it is called to make sure not to
hide the bug of a tracepoint being called when RCU is not watching.

There is one case in the irq_disable tracepoint where it is within a
trace_irq_disable_enabled() block, but it checks if RCU is watching, and
if it isn't, it makes a call to ct_irq_enter() that makes RCU watch again.
But because trace_irq_disable_enabled() now checks if RCU is watching and
will trigger if it isn't. This is a false warning as the code within
the block handles this case.

Add a new internal macro __trace_##event##_enabled() that doesn't check if
RCU is watching, and convert the irq_enable/disable tracepoints over to
it.

Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXud_RpWag_hFqa2ByBGRxg6KnxGL1ObCWZrpTsk3TfAw@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 9764e731ef6ab ("tracepoint: Add lockdep rcu_is_watching() check to trace_##name##_enabled()")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 include/linux/tracepoint.h      | 12 +++++++++++-
 kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
index 4a0c36f40fe2..e0d838c9ce93 100644
--- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
@@ -292,13 +292,18 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
 	{								\
 	}								\
 	static inline bool						\
+	__trace_##name##_enabled(void)					\
+	{								\
+		return static_branch_unlikely(&__tracepoint_##name.key);\
+	}								\
+	static inline bool						\
 	trace_##name##_enabled(void)					\
 	{								\
 		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) {			\
 			WARN_ONCE(!rcu_is_watching(),			\
 				  "RCU not watching for tracepoint");	\
 		}							\
-		return static_branch_unlikely(&__tracepoint_##name.key);\
+		return __trace_##name##_enabled();			\
 	}
 
 #define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto)			\
@@ -457,6 +462,11 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
 	{								\
 	}								\
 	static inline bool						\
+	__trace_##name##_enabled(void)					\
+	{								\
+		return false;						\
+	}								\
+	static inline bool						\
 	trace_##name##_enabled(void)					\
 	{								\
 		return false;						\
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
index 0c42b15c3800..b63e3558948f 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 #else
 #define trace(point, args)					\
 	do {							\
-		if (trace_##point##_enabled()) {		\
+		if (__trace_##point##_enabled()) {		\
 			bool exit_rcu = false;			\
 			if (in_nmi())				\
 				break;				\
-- 
2.53.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 17:27 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2026-07-02  8:50 ` [PATCH] tracing: Add a no-rcu-check version of trace_##event##_enabled() Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260701132744.6a7fc68b@robin \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox