Re: [PATCH] clang-format: Fix formatting of guard() and scoped_guard() statements

["Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>]

Hi,

I just noticed this patch with v7.2-rc1 .  This looks good for
scoped_guard()(){}, but not for guard(rcu)() (see
security/landlock/*.[ch]):

-       guard(rcu)();
+       guard(rcu)
+               ();

Should we revert the "guard" entry?

 Mickaël

On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 11:23:48AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Without this patch clang-format formats guard() and scoped_guard()
> statements as follows:
> 
> 	guard(...)(...)

This should be scoped_guard(...)(...)

> 	{
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> With this patch clang-format formats guard() and scoped_guard()
> statements as follows:
> 
> 	guard(...)(...) {
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
>  .clang-format | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/.clang-format b/.clang-format
> index 1cc151e2adcc..6a3de86ab27a 100644
> --- a/.clang-format
> +++ b/.clang-format
> @@ -481,6 +481,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
>    - 'genradix_for_each'
>    - 'genradix_for_each_from'
>    - 'genradix_for_each_reverse'
> +  - 'guard'
>    - 'hash_for_each'
>    - 'hash_for_each_possible'
>    - 'hash_for_each_possible_rcu'
> @@ -674,6 +675,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
>    - 'rq_list_for_each'
>    - 'rq_list_for_each_safe'
>    - 'sample_read_group__for_each'
> +  - 'scoped_guard'
>    - 'scsi_for_each_prot_sg'
>    - 'scsi_for_each_sg'
>    - 'sctp_for_each_hentry'