From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@loongson.cn>
Cc: Binbin Zhou <zhoubb.aaron@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>,
Chong Qiao <qiaochong@loongson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Xuerui Wang <kernel@xen0n.name>,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jeffbai@aosc.io, kexybiscuit@aosc.io, zhuyunfei@loongson.cn,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: ls2kbmc: mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix iomem pointer handling in video mode parsing
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:57:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702155701.GY2108533@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624085550.1508771-1-zhoubinbin@loongson.cn>
Please consider these:
/* Sashiko Automation: Issues Found (4 Findings) */
On Wed, 24 Jun 2026, Binbin Zhou wrote:
> Use pointers annotated with the __iomem marker for all iomem map calls,
> and creates a local copy of the mapped IO memory for future access in
> the code. memcpy_fromio() and memcpy_toio() are used to read/write data
> from/to mapped IO memory
>
> Fixes: 0d64f6d1ffe9 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Introduce Loongson-2K BMC core driver")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603021730.Yy3QXYTw-lkp@intel.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606120639.WG6eb8VU-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@loongson.cn>
> ---
> V2:
> - Add the missing memcpy_fromio();
> - Drop the unnecessary `buf` variable.
>
> Link to V1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616115530.4012675-1-zhoubinbin@loongson.cn/
>
> drivers/mfd/ls2k-bmc-core.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ls2k-bmc-core.c b/drivers/mfd/ls2k-bmc-core.c
> index 408056bfb2fe..1312812860c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/ls2k-bmc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ls2k-bmc-core.c
> @@ -427,14 +427,20 @@ static int ls2k_bmc_init(struct ls2k_bmc_ddata *ddata)
> */
> static int ls2k_bmc_parse_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct simplefb_platform_data *pd)
> {
> - char *mode;
> + char *mode __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + void __iomem *base;
> int depth, ret;
>
> /* The last 16M of PCI BAR0 is used to store the resolution string. */
> - mode = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, pci_resource_start(pdev, 0) + SZ_16M, SZ_16M);
> + base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, pci_resource_start(pdev, 0) + SZ_16M, SZ_16M);
> + if (!base)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mode = kmalloc(SZ_16M, GFP_KERNEL);
[Severity: High]
Will this 16MB allocation unconditionally fail on systems where
KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE is smaller, such as 4MB with 4K pages?
Even if successful, is it necessary to synchronously copy 16MB of device
I/O memory just to read a short resolution string?
> if (!mode)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + memcpy_fromio(mode, base, SZ_16M);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since the buffer is now allocated on the
heap via kmalloc() and copied directly from device memory, will string
functions like strncmp() and strsep() read out-of-bounds if the 16MB
region lacks a null terminator byte?
> /* The resolution field starts with the flag "video=". */
> if (!strncmp(mode, "video=", 6))
> mode = mode + 6;
[Severity: High]
Since mode was declared with __free(kfree), will advancing the pointer
here cause kfree() to be called with a mid-buffer pointer and crash the
allocator when ls2k_bmc_parse_mode() returns?
>
> base-commit: c454531af72e0df811600601413bb8d3d039ed08
> --
> 2.52.0
>
--
Lee Jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 8:55 [PATCH v2] mfd: ls2kbmc: mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix iomem pointer handling in video mode parsing Binbin Zhou
2026-06-24 14:36 ` Huacai Chen
2026-07-02 15:57 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2026-07-03 9:44 ` Binbin Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702155701.GY2108533@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@loongson.cn \
--cc=jeffbai@aosc.io \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kexybiscuit@aosc.io \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=qiaochong@loongson.cn \
--cc=zhoubb.aaron@gmail.com \
--cc=zhoubinbin@loongson.cn \
--cc=zhuyunfei@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox