The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@linutronix.de>
To: Andrew Murray <amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] printk: nbcon: move printk_delay to console emiting code
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 16:56:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703165654.71be8707@mitra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630-deprecate_boot_delay-v2-3-f9883d36aa4b@thegoodpenguin.co.uk>

On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:35:59 +0100
Andrew Murray <amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk> wrote:

> The printk_delay and boot_delay features are helpful for debugging
> as kernel output can be slowed down during boot allowing messages to
> be seen before scrolling off the screen, or to correlate timing
> between some physical event and console output.
By now, it slows down the boot process, which is the handy part of that
feature.

> However, since the introduction of nbcon and the legacy printer thread
> for PREEMPT_RT kernels, printk records are now emited to the console
> asynchronously to the caller of printk. Thus, any printk delay added
> by boot_delay/printk_delay continues to slow down the calling process
> but may not have any impact to the rate in which records are emited
> to the console.
Using this feature to slow down the boot/suspend/resume process and
implicit make printk() happen, is the usefull part of that feature.
Imagine this sequence (which hit me on suspend/resume on i.MX after
shutting down all secondary CPUs)

  printk("A");
  (do some stuff)
  printk("B");
  read from peripheral --> system got stuck here since peripheral was
  not clocked or powered or both any more.

The delay (and later on a ugly patch to make printk() synchrounous)
helped to locate where the failed access happend. JTAG did not help,
since the CPU got stuck --> no JTAG communication to that CPU.

With your purposed change you *may* see "A", but never "B".
Quite challenging...

So please leave the delay on the calling side - it is helpfull there.

Regards
    Bene Spranger

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-03 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-30 16:35 [PATCH v2 0/4] printk: nbcon: deprecate boot_delay in favour of printk_delay Andrew Murray
2026-06-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] printk: remove BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY config option Andrew Murray
2026-06-30 17:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] printk: deprecate boot_delay in favour of printk_delay Andrew Murray
2026-06-30 16:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] printk: nbcon: move printk_delay to console emiting code Andrew Murray
2026-06-30 17:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 13:03     ` John Ogness
2026-07-03 12:57   ` John Ogness
2026-07-03 14:56   ` Benedikt Spranger [this message]
2026-06-30 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Documentation/kernel-parameters: add/update printk_delay/boot_delay Andrew Murray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260703165654.71be8707@mitra \
    --to=b.spranger@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox