From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com (mail-wm1-f42.google.com [209.85.128.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C679E241695 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2026 23:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783208829; cv=none; b=WUaN/8jz+Sub4YO6xcQ9bNGKMTwHgijXpo2gopSBNmpLHZYhcIrSM+NLewNSXiE+Gb6EOT0o4QMIwe1RMxmYvNI8KxPfxh2NeQSFm/txhKESX/z3s12UD+HNifr1Cc5+qUkaTcEaudqXUqyRO7OVlSFGHo7VOaZYsJCXiP48e9k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783208829; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hG23Q4y5aBcg3cuKpH3vsyLBWDktEghaMP46k932PwE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=iJWo+Hb+6+/KnW/ymXdPxOzPMp0Wj/yot1fs5p1sgvAPBqf/B5kG0Yo7dzuqYycmyUlM5Ixb9FEAt26JPKpdsdFG5JxuD/+zQ16L7tEqckPwwnmQFRmVCL67CZO/IqclBq0gvde894vw3fu7Dkxuec/CD9+JyFsNcJw84PSzLD8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=ez/HwjQa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ez/HwjQa" Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-493a6258788so591805e9.3 for ; Sat, 04 Jul 2026 16:47:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1783208826; x=1783813626; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=VP4mk76KIzqP5E59dkvynV+Ki6J6pthrQtt+0HdWFW0=; b=ez/HwjQahvWEFOi7JXEfrb2nnK79Ajct+Ipp8HSWwUd6sm/lCF67RTkx7CuU4dhiuR VJsDPnYET/Ch8brTLmyAgmn3aklYYxaZciJdp0CchbUgTZRXaZg8LmzBJZ+DBVsa7yJD TCCyhbr048jqR6H4jKwSJYIeNx+lzqh9XaooUWwoajnnSgvQo+33Me0sq7+uydUNznIK ZnrbZ3qLPCacINrCrdbPZt4oh8/ywZ81X7L/etMCtoo3ShXxF3gnh6h87qytESWRvbqd RXCJsH0SLQ2YowPih8Guo5uTHtZD3Txo9TKHn4twkO4OfEtIy2iVsh6ZAzhAbu5LkxVv 0lGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1783208826; x=1783813626; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=VP4mk76KIzqP5E59dkvynV+Ki6J6pthrQtt+0HdWFW0=; b=g0Vm9SYqyVbVOsX4rykF1VYSc5xaslb+9lLW42JLU8sE/xj+2BsFCe6V2f8j54dpM2 tZW+CNFPypPYGQzNaqEQ5Eww4M/a/oQUj9pwhTK36247OyaIRuPfuf3EWwim0UZaplj5 3qI8nWBn1AJ+OeB6nYiT0wTQvoWxScZIZzm/6KueVvFnFZvJhBZyIOun9ur+Y/cunNzc WJrNUiqlRDBYEYkBf+hvhvqSBJdAnNY6CNahq/sBRsk9XmfU+aLru3nPykUkIZgci8Ve 38j2YIM/klH+yXNOEBHBmI3J/HkqEFebGW2RCPXC88YV7inuNBDLGpNGBYjVMR0JCIQP Tw1g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ8hyoj0luY00pqBAiyME3aheQ/WsHQ2LHxKZXl2tz2k2bzIbBRrnlbb9xP4RRkh8EwBDjCO4a0qivMLLMc=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxXh53FPFa4HigdoKShWkFNl6y7AmYWN/jpnkuHPBFAVTr5MUj8 pibJ5+hA+2QOTj8yePVt/S7TX1yl3atgMg1G2omYUxqN1Y80/W52Mxt/ X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7cnsGV3MDyBdIaZk7s/+bUr/9e8dj9tb2Br7HIGuXk3z74SSnCTjeXKo4Ujfdq7 ZmSWAf83fuSbZxQAxCj9lpktlRp0FpWuK8DOGcR+YuDXts9lIL0hsCd7wR8ampMGbFGm1tKQVoL BMBR0e7Os+7UvmZZtXW3teNHaUAYSWpHFHk3M7ctrT9Zpo2PlBfGTjzGKvCG1jRrpujPqVdQOFu VpK3YR+i8shzARmVe3n/6PHt1vF9UVWqRwKyc7H58kRDPGs/20eh8+98r3qvuiqljYolSm1DNR/ mbvBFKhUgjreu/J1vgj+x5b4XfrBrpb59RVjewJ5tMsjk7aAcb2rHM5W2edczhURWk1vDxcWeL+ OrpfdSV4g0spS2+h4O/i90mxOPyPN9GMd+gpE9H5yVd9B1+3LMJjpulY8v9vPGJ4UqalNsMwn8/ 5C7jy5+9jqVgDbG6imdSsFO62DYTNTrIItYXcafgyEs3wlvGwzfHdJBh9uA48kg7phOcrYV7W9g noxwXiTMg1G21kfNtvALqxpAcDQK63E3iqrI6kWW4c/h1ROutg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:8217:b0:493:bea7:6b67 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-493d0f35d08mr31512525e9.3.1783208825954; Sat, 04 Jul 2026 16:47:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpubt (dynamic-2a02-3100-5cf8-ddfc-6651-06ff-fed8-72a4.310.pool.telefonica.de. [2a02:3100:5cf8:ddfc:6651:6ff:fed8:72a4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-493cce040b4sm216014125e9.10.2026.07.04.16.47.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 04 Jul 2026 16:47:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Xin Xie To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xin Xie Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: hsr: PRP RedBox (PRP-SAN) support Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2026 23:47:00 +0000 Message-ID: <20260704234704.4297-1-xiexinet@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This series adds PRP RedBox support to the hsr driver: a PRP node that proxies one or more SANs sitting behind an interlink port (IEC 62439-3, PRP-SAN). HSR-SAN has been supported since commit 5055cccfc2d1 ("net: hsr: Provide RedBox support (HSR-SAN)"); this extends the equivalent capability to PRP, reusing the existing protocol-neutral proxy machinery (proxy_node_db, hsr_proxy_announce(), hsr_prune_proxy_nodes()). A SAN behind the interlink does bidirectional unicast with peers on the PRP network, its source MAC is preserved on the wire, the PRP RCT is correct, and the RedBox announces each proxied SAN with the RedBox-MAC TLV (Type 30) in its supervision frames. The series is bisect-safe: the datapath, duplicate discard and supervision support are added first; the rtnetlink rejection of "type hsr ... interlink proto 1" is removed only in patch 3, once the feature is complete. Design notes: - prp_drop_frame() does not walk the node tables. The destination classification (PRP-network node vs proxied SAN) is resolved once per frame in fill_frame_info() and cached in struct hsr_frame_info, so the per egress-port drop decision is O(1) in the softIRQ path. The classification is gated on PRP RedBox devices (prot_version == PRP_V1 && hsr->redbox), so HSR RedBox traffic is not affected. - The LAN A/B duplicate test is factored into prp_is_lan_dup() so the new PRP interlink rules in prp_drop_frame() do not change hsr_drop_frame() behaviour, including the NETIF_F_HW_HSR_FWD path. This is software PRP RedBox only; it adds no new hardware-offload contract. - The supervision emitter uses pre-reserved tailroom (hsr_init_skb() + skb_put()) on the existing GFP_ATOMIC path; no skb_linearize() or pskb_expand_head(). The RedBox-MAC TLV is followed by an explicit EOT (Type 0, Length 0); padding via skb_put_padto(ETH_ZLEN) and the 6-byte PRP RCT remain at the absolute tail of the egress frame. - The hsr_get_node() hsr_ethhdr length guard is relaxed only for PRP supervision frames (prot_version == PRP_V1 && ETH_P_PRP && is_sup), which are untagged with mac_len == ETH_HLEN. HSR (ETH_P_HSR) supervision is front-tagged and keeps the original length requirement, so HSR malformed-frame filtering is unchanged. Testing (on a net-next v7.2-rc1 kernel built from this base, x86-64): - checkpatch.pl --strict: patches 1-3 clean; patch 4 reports only the expected "added file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?" note, which is ignorable here -- MAINTAINERS already lists tools/testing/selftests/net/hsr/ under HSR NETWORK PROTOCOL. - git diff --check clean; the series git-am's onto the base commit. - tools/testing/selftests/net/hsr/hsr_prp_redbox.sh: PASS on the patched kernel (bidirectional unicast, SAN MAC preservation, RedBox-MAC TLV + EOT in the proxy-announce). - HSR regression on the same kernel: hsr_redbox.sh (HSR-SAN/RedBox), hsr_ping.sh and prp_ping.sh all PASS, confirming the PRP changes do not regress the existing HSR/PRP paths. - netns checks: peer<->SAN 0% loss with no duplicates and a valid PRP RCT on the wire; a silent SAN is pruned from the announce; zero driver WARN/BUG/Oops/RCU-stall during the run. Beyond the in-tree selftest, this exact series (applied to this base and running as the net-next kernel on x86-64 hardware) was also validated with an out-of-tree IEC 62439-3 conformance harness (supervision TLV chain, duplicate discard, cross-LAN rejection, seqnr rollover, VLAN/multicast/GOOSE frame types with the RCT verified at the absolute frame tail), and interoperability-tested against a commercial PRP RedBox (Siemens SCALANCE X204RNA) over 100 Mbit/s Fast Ethernet with NIC hardware (PTP) timestamping: a mid-stream single-LAN outage of ~2 s at 10 kpps was bridged with zero lost and zero duplicate frames (seamless PRP failover), and the duplicate-discard window held zero lost / zero duplicates under netem asymmetric delay up to 100 ms (~1000 sequence numbers in flight), 25% reorder, and 5% single-LAN loss. The failover and impairment matrix was additionally repeated on a KASAN + lockdep + kmemleak instrumented build of this kernel, including a 72-carrier-event link flap-storm with deliberate double-LAN cuts: zero KASAN, lockdep, or kmemleak findings. This out-of-tree testing is supplementary and not required to evaluate the series. Xin Xie (4): net: hsr: add PRP interlink (RedBox) datapath and duplicate discard net: hsr: emit RedBox-MAC TLV in PRP RedBox supervision frames net: hsr: allow PRP RedBox (interlink) creation selftests: net: hsr: add PRP RedBox test net/hsr/hsr_device.c | 33 ++++++- net/hsr/hsr_forward.c | 49 ++++++++-- net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c | 23 ++++- net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h | 2 + net/hsr/hsr_netlink.c | 8 +- tools/testing/selftests/net/hsr/Makefile | 1 + .../selftests/net/hsr/hsr_prp_redbox.sh | 96 +++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/hsr/hsr_prp_redbox.sh base-commit: b73bc9ca3686b78b642fb35dcc1fdf874ecb74a1 -- 2.53.0