From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E613A3A0E8A for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2026 21:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783285866; cv=none; b=J/Skc+exEgvr6ZFxSDYCAikxhy5ah3HlSoQXP9p9gGRNgmyFBCVB25s11+0oCzFtCr+3d0gtEjedTpZSVDP9WD5xwqcdQOBWYSWv9FQzYI5X+XWQXMPaMrB+P290pOAkik1x9QoQKaUdxv55x7K5pgc9sTk8b6/FwiKZhS/kG98= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783285866; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zX7icrWI+Qk2GmN+lqhP1qfBuP/cDgSWF4voWYtO+4c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=XpZCykClFC8ePWiu4F6uypmAecIhr+n71j8+w2MfDccZ3M9OPQdFLgRGcMGUwHBSrxU96rMAnZ4894EdKRWASKhfRzbGSmJ3BhHHj95eHHzsjFLWD1/DmmR+h5p3Xp6AFbMaxLurmIf/ZeNPbXMdCbuVYmWcy5sQdxDY6KdAWiE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=N8FVIR36; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="N8FVIR36" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D8591F000E9; Sun, 5 Jul 2026 21:11:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783285865; bh=GebDB3AJgijwXFEI2D6qbtBmvdEtIrR7/9BKZNSnL98=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=N8FVIR36pgDT32drTy3Yhc60ZhdzltCghnVTYfC7vcv+x6l2mRywdYo9oh6MuNSfr rVTfX6xl6blRH7CpG6gqz4+ye+YUcjyr5refou0IVfbAOkT+kI6oSPE3UG3mLglJIS Gb4c7DqJoupGojY5uWc4P2vfVDos+L7U4Q6R5lK1XrQ3zbFGfiz3TyziZe9OYHpAOx PSc7blRkObVZHOGrjbUj14hxSqd8FP4W/XK7Loq1R3rDhVazLQuSFdMT6KwJ6RL4M9 4RuaJm2jFicIFEDkaeWZJV+2QjJ5FvJAZUMc57D0/yo1cR6LA53c5KiphYyR9wz14T z5y4ds7Azqd+w== From: SJ Park To: Mike Rapoport Cc: SJ Park , Lorenzo Stoakes , Andrew Morton , Usama Arif , david@kernel.org, chrisl@kernel.org, kasong@tencent.com, ziy@nvidia.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, Baoquan He , willy@infradead.org, youngjun.park@lge.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, alex@ghiti.fr, kas@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org, dev.jain@arm.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, npache@redhat.com, "Liam R. Howlett" , ryan.roberts@arm.com, Vlastimil Babka , lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nphamcs@gmail.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm: preparatory patches for PMD level swap entries Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:10:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20260705211055.99706-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sat, 4 Jul 2026 13:04:02 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi SJ, > > On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 12:45:01PM -0700, SJ Park wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:08:03 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > > > CI grabs patches from patchwork and tries to apply them to one of the three > > > bases: mm-unstable, mm-new or the latest Linus' commit merged into mm.git. > > > > > > If patches apply, the other bases are not checked. > > > > > > This patches applied cleanly to mm-unstable and successfully passed (at > > > least once :) ) > > > https://github.com/linux-mm/linux-mm/actions/runs/28544575927/ > > > > Awesome! > > > > I found the CI script (mm-ci) on the GitHub organization. Is the repo open to > > contributions? > > Yes :) > > > If so, between GitHub PR and patches to linux-mm@ what is more > > preferred? > > The way it works, all testing update should go to mm-ci. There is a bot > that takes them from there and generates PRs inn linux-mm that include > patches and the CI files. Thank you for sharing the detail! > > > Seems it is not running DAMON specific tests, and I want to add > > DAMON kunit test to the test set as a first step (DAMO selftest is bit flaky on > > some systems), if people don't mind. > > Patches are welcome :) > > If DAMON selftest is flaky let's keep it out for now please, otherwise it > would cause too much noise. Yes, surely agreed. There is nothing to rush :) > > > I or someone else may also want to add more tests like Cc list checking [1] in > > future. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260703190421.100480-1-sj@kernel.org > > Yeah, I think it would be helpful. Cool, I'll try to take time to understand it more, and make some contributions. Thanks, SJ [...]