From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Friedrich Welter <fritz@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautam Gala <ggala@linux.ibm.com>,
Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/27] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 10:52:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706085229.979525-10-seiden@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706085229.979525-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
While for arm64 the members of vcpu_gp_regs are allocated continuous
this is not necessarily true for other architectures implementing ARM.
Let vcpu_gp_regs() no longer return the address of the user_pt_regs in
the vcpu context but the address of the gp-register array field in the
user_pt_reg struct.
Share the gp register functions with s390.
No functional change.
Co-developed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 13 +++++++++----
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++++++-
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c | 7 +++++--
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 6 +++---
arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 6 ++++--
7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index a1c92d2436ae..15d6d6a08d37 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -140,12 +140,17 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vsesr)
static __always_inline unsigned long *vcpu_pc(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pc;
+ return (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pc;
}
static __always_inline unsigned long *vcpu_cpsr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate;
+ return (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate;
+}
+
+static __always_inline unsigned long *vcpu_sp_el0(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.sp;
}
static __always_inline bool vcpu_mode_is_32bit(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -175,14 +180,14 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static __always_inline unsigned long vcpu_get_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
u8 reg_num)
{
- return (reg_num == 31) ? 0 : vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs[reg_num];
+ return (reg_num == 31) ? 0 : vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[reg_num];
}
static __always_inline void vcpu_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num,
unsigned long val)
{
if (reg_num != 31)
- vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs[reg_num] = val;
+ vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[reg_num] = val;
}
#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index ae9f76378218..2fce38fd9152 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
#define vcpu_clear_on_unsupported_cpu(vcpu) \
vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, ON_UNSUPPORTED_CPU)
-#define vcpu_gp_regs(v) (&(v)->arch.ctxt.regs)
+#define vcpu_gp_regs(v) ((v)->arch.ctxt.regs.regs)
/*
* Only use __vcpu_sys_reg/ctxt_sys_reg if you know you want the
@@ -1201,6 +1201,12 @@ static inline u64 *___ctxt_sys_reg(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, int r)
#define ctxt_sys_reg(c,r) (*__ctxt_sys_reg(c,r))
+#define kvm_vcpu_get_sp_el1(__vcpu) (__ctxt_sys_reg(&(__vcpu)->arch.ctxt, SP_EL1))
+#define kvm_vcpu_get_vreg(__vcpu, _n) (&(__vcpu)->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.vregs[_n])
+#define kvm_vcpu_get_vregs(__vcpu) (&(__vcpu)->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.vregs)
+#define kvm_vcpu_get_fpsr(__vcpu) (&(__vcpu)->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpsr)
+#define kvm_vcpu_get_fpcr(__vcpu) (&(__vcpu)->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpcr)
+
u64 kvm_vcpu_apply_reg_masks(const struct kvm_vcpu *, enum vcpu_sysreg, u64);
#define __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(v, r, val) \
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 5a202cfd27bc..5e1e1faa98c2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ const struct kvm_stats_header kvm_vcpu_stats_header = {
sizeof(kvm_vcpu_stats_desc),
};
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
static bool core_reg_offset_is_vreg(u64 off)
{
return off >= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs) &&
@@ -134,19 +135,19 @@ static void *core_reg_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[30]):
off -= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]);
off /= 2;
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.regs[off];
+ return &vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[off];
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp):
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.sp;
+ return vcpu_sp_el0(vcpu);
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.pc):
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pc;
+ return vcpu_pc(vcpu);
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.pstate):
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate;
+ return vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(sp_el1):
- return __ctxt_sys_reg(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, SP_EL1);
+ return kvm_vcpu_get_sp_el1(vcpu);
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(elr_el1):
return __ctxt_sys_reg(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, ELR_EL1);
@@ -170,13 +171,13 @@ static void *core_reg_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[31]):
off -= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0]);
off /= 4;
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.vregs[off];
+ return kvm_vcpu_get_vreg(vcpu, off);
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr):
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpsr;
+ return kvm_vcpu_get_fpsr(vcpu);
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpcr):
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpcr;
+ return kvm_vcpu_get_fpcr(vcpu);
default:
return NULL;
@@ -306,6 +307,8 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
return err;
}
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
#define vq_word(vq) (((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) / 64)
#define vq_mask(vq) ((u64)1 << ((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) % 64)
#define vq_present(vqs, vq) (!!((vqs)[vq_word(vq)] & vq_mask(vq)))
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
index bef40ddb16db..82611442a2d1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
@@ -277,6 +277,9 @@ static const u8 return_offsets[8][2] = {
[7] = { 4, 4 }, /* FIQ, unused */
};
+#define OFFSETOF_PT_REG(__r) offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, __r)
+#define COMPAT_IDX(__c) ((OFFSETOF_PT_REG(__c) - OFFSETOF_PT_REG(regs[0])) / sizeof(u64))
+
static void enter_exception32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 mode, u32 vect_offset)
{
unsigned long spsr = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
@@ -292,12 +295,12 @@ static void enter_exception32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 mode, u32 vect_offset)
switch(mode) {
case PSR_AA32_MODE_ABT:
__vcpu_write_spsr_abt(vcpu, host_spsr_to_spsr32(spsr));
- vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->compat_lr_abt = return_address;
+ vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[COMPAT_IDX(compat_lr_abt)] = return_address;
break;
case PSR_AA32_MODE_UND:
__vcpu_write_spsr_und(vcpu, host_spsr_to_spsr32(spsr));
- vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->compat_lr_und = return_address;
+ vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[COMPAT_IDX(compat_lr_und)] = return_address;
break;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
index 4fdfeabefeb4..a049983bd5c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
@@ -33,11 +33,11 @@ static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static inline void __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
- vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
+ *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
- write_sysreg_el2(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate, SYS_SPSR);
+ write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), SYS_SPSR);
write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), SYS_ELR);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index 18131e395e24..a57aec6dd854 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static inline bool __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static inline bool kvm_hyp_handle_mops(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
{
*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
- arm64_mops_reset_regs(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2);
+ arm64_mops_reset_regs(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs, vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2);
write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), SYS_ELR);
/*
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static inline void synchronize_vcpu_pstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/*
* Check for the conditions of Cortex-A510's #2077057. When these occur
* SPSR_EL2 can't be trusted, but isn't needed either as it is
- * unchanged from the value in vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate.
+ * unchanged from the value in vcpu_cpsr(vcpu).
* Are we single-stepping the guest, and took a PAC exception from the
* active-not-pending state?
*/
@@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ static inline void synchronize_vcpu_pstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
ESR_ELx_EC(read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ESR)) == ESR_ELx_EC_PAC)
write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), SYS_SPSR);
- vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
+ *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
}
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index faab6f03f365..1ce3b26cc1ae 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -221,13 +221,15 @@ void kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
/* Reset core registers */
- memset(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), 0, sizeof(*vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)));
+ memset(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), 0, sizeof(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)));
+ *vcpu_pc(vcpu) = 0;
+ *vcpu_sp_el0(vcpu) = 0;
memset(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs));
vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_abt = 0;
vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_und = 0;
vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_irq = 0;
vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_fiq = 0;
- vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate = pstate;
+ *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = pstate;
/* Reset system registers */
kvm_reset_sys_regs(vcpu);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 8:52 [PATCH v4 00/27] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/27] VFIO: take reference to the KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 19:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 21:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe) from vfio Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm) " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/27] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/27] KVM: Remove KVM_MMIO as config option Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 20:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/27] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/27] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 21:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/27] KVM: arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 21:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` Steffen Eiden [this message]
2026-07-06 17:44 ` [PATCH v4 09/27] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/27] KVM: arm64: Refactor core-reset into a separate function Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/27] s390: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/27] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/27] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 14/27] KVM: s390: Move s390 kvm code into a subdirectory Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 15/27] KVM: S390: Prepare gmap for a second KVM implementation Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 16/27] KVM: s390: gmap: Refactor storage key and CMMA code into separate files Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 17/27] KVM: s390: Refactor prefix handling into a separate file Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 18/27] KVM: s390: Prepare kvm-s390 for a second kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 19/27] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:17 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 11:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-06 11:58 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:53 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 20/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 21/27] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:50 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 22/27] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 23/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 12:15 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 20:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 24/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 25/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 26/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 27/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild Steffen Eiden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706085229.979525-10-seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--to=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fritz@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ggala@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hari55@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox