The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Friedrich Welter <fritz@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gautam Gala <ggala@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/27] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually
Date: Mon,  6 Jul 2026 10:52:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706085229.979525-10-seiden@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706085229.979525-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

While for arm64 the members of vcpu_gp_regs are allocated continuous
this is not necessarily true for other architectures implementing ARM.

Let vcpu_gp_regs() no longer return the address of the user_pt_regs in
the vcpu context but the address of the gp-register array field in the
user_pt_reg struct.

Share the gp register functions with s390.

No functional change.

Co-developed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h       | 13 +++++++++----
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |  8 +++++++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c                     | 19 +++++++++++--------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c             |  7 +++++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h |  4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h    |  6 +++---
 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c                     |  6 ++++--
 7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index a1c92d2436ae..15d6d6a08d37 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -140,12 +140,17 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vsesr)
 
 static __always_inline unsigned long *vcpu_pc(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pc;
+	return (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pc;
 }
 
 static __always_inline unsigned long *vcpu_cpsr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate;
+	return (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate;
+}
+
+static __always_inline unsigned long *vcpu_sp_el0(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.sp;
 }
 
 static __always_inline bool vcpu_mode_is_32bit(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -175,14 +180,14 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 static __always_inline unsigned long vcpu_get_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 					 u8 reg_num)
 {
-	return (reg_num == 31) ? 0 : vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs[reg_num];
+	return (reg_num == 31) ? 0 : vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[reg_num];
 }
 
 static __always_inline void vcpu_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num,
 				unsigned long val)
 {
 	if (reg_num != 31)
-		vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs[reg_num] = val;
+		vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[reg_num] = val;
 }
 
 #endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index ae9f76378218..2fce38fd9152 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 #define vcpu_clear_on_unsupported_cpu(vcpu)				\
 	vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, ON_UNSUPPORTED_CPU)
 
-#define vcpu_gp_regs(v)		(&(v)->arch.ctxt.regs)
+#define vcpu_gp_regs(v)		((v)->arch.ctxt.regs.regs)
 
 /*
  * Only use __vcpu_sys_reg/ctxt_sys_reg if you know you want the
@@ -1201,6 +1201,12 @@ static inline u64 *___ctxt_sys_reg(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, int r)
 
 #define ctxt_sys_reg(c,r)	(*__ctxt_sys_reg(c,r))
 
+#define kvm_vcpu_get_sp_el1(__vcpu) (__ctxt_sys_reg(&(__vcpu)->arch.ctxt, SP_EL1))
+#define kvm_vcpu_get_vreg(__vcpu, _n) (&(__vcpu)->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.vregs[_n])
+#define kvm_vcpu_get_vregs(__vcpu) (&(__vcpu)->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.vregs)
+#define kvm_vcpu_get_fpsr(__vcpu) (&(__vcpu)->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpsr)
+#define kvm_vcpu_get_fpcr(__vcpu) (&(__vcpu)->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpcr)
+
 u64 kvm_vcpu_apply_reg_masks(const struct kvm_vcpu *, enum vcpu_sysreg, u64);
 
 #define __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(v, r, val)				\
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 5a202cfd27bc..5e1e1faa98c2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ const struct kvm_stats_header kvm_vcpu_stats_header = {
 		       sizeof(kvm_vcpu_stats_desc),
 };
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static bool core_reg_offset_is_vreg(u64 off)
 {
 	return off >= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs) &&
@@ -134,19 +135,19 @@ static void *core_reg_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 	     KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[30]):
 		off -= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]);
 		off /= 2;
-		return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.regs[off];
+		return &vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[off];
 
 	case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp):
-		return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.sp;
+		return vcpu_sp_el0(vcpu);
 
 	case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.pc):
-		return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pc;
+		return vcpu_pc(vcpu);
 
 	case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.pstate):
-		return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate;
+		return vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
 
 	case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(sp_el1):
-		return __ctxt_sys_reg(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, SP_EL1);
+		return  kvm_vcpu_get_sp_el1(vcpu);
 
 	case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(elr_el1):
 		return __ctxt_sys_reg(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, ELR_EL1);
@@ -170,13 +171,13 @@ static void *core_reg_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 	     KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[31]):
 		off -= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0]);
 		off /= 4;
-		return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.vregs[off];
+		return kvm_vcpu_get_vreg(vcpu, off);
 
 	case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr):
-		return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpsr;
+		return  kvm_vcpu_get_fpsr(vcpu);
 
 	case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpcr):
-		return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpcr;
+		return  kvm_vcpu_get_fpcr(vcpu);
 
 	default:
 		return NULL;
@@ -306,6 +307,8 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 	return err;
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 #define vq_word(vq) (((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) / 64)
 #define vq_mask(vq) ((u64)1 << ((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) % 64)
 #define vq_present(vqs, vq) (!!((vqs)[vq_word(vq)] & vq_mask(vq)))
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
index bef40ddb16db..82611442a2d1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
@@ -277,6 +277,9 @@ static const u8 return_offsets[8][2] = {
 	[7] = { 4, 4 },		/* FIQ, unused */
 };
 
+#define OFFSETOF_PT_REG(__r) offsetof(struct user_pt_regs, __r)
+#define COMPAT_IDX(__c) ((OFFSETOF_PT_REG(__c) - OFFSETOF_PT_REG(regs[0])) / sizeof(u64))
+
 static void enter_exception32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 mode, u32 vect_offset)
 {
 	unsigned long spsr = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
@@ -292,12 +295,12 @@ static void enter_exception32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 mode, u32 vect_offset)
 	switch(mode) {
 	case PSR_AA32_MODE_ABT:
 		__vcpu_write_spsr_abt(vcpu, host_spsr_to_spsr32(spsr));
-		vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->compat_lr_abt = return_address;
+		vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[COMPAT_IDX(compat_lr_abt)] = return_address;
 		break;
 
 	case PSR_AA32_MODE_UND:
 		__vcpu_write_spsr_und(vcpu, host_spsr_to_spsr32(spsr));
-		vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->compat_lr_und = return_address;
+		vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[COMPAT_IDX(compat_lr_und)] = return_address;
 		break;
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
index 4fdfeabefeb4..a049983bd5c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
@@ -33,11 +33,11 @@ static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 static inline void __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
-	vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
+	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
 
 	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
 
-	write_sysreg_el2(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate, SYS_SPSR);
+	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), SYS_SPSR);
 	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), SYS_ELR);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index 18131e395e24..a57aec6dd854 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static inline bool __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 static inline bool kvm_hyp_handle_mops(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 {
 	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
-	arm64_mops_reset_regs(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2);
+	arm64_mops_reset_regs(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs, vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2);
 	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), SYS_ELR);
 
 	/*
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static inline void synchronize_vcpu_pstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	/*
 	 * Check for the conditions of Cortex-A510's #2077057. When these occur
 	 * SPSR_EL2 can't be trusted, but isn't needed either as it is
-	 * unchanged from the value in vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate.
+	 * unchanged from the value in vcpu_cpsr(vcpu).
 	 * Are we single-stepping the guest, and took a PAC exception from the
 	 * active-not-pending state?
 	 */
@@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ static inline void synchronize_vcpu_pstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	    ESR_ELx_EC(read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ESR)) == ESR_ELx_EC_PAC)
 		write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), SYS_SPSR);
 
-	vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
+	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index faab6f03f365..1ce3b26cc1ae 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -221,13 +221,15 @@ void kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
 
 	/* Reset core registers */
-	memset(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), 0, sizeof(*vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)));
+	memset(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), 0, sizeof(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)));
+	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = 0;
+	*vcpu_sp_el0(vcpu) = 0;
 	memset(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs));
 	vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_abt = 0;
 	vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_und = 0;
 	vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_irq = 0;
 	vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_fiq = 0;
-	vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate = pstate;
+	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = pstate;
 
 	/* Reset system registers */
 	kvm_reset_sys_regs(vcpu);
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  8:52 [PATCH v4 00/27] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/27] VFIO: take reference to the KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 19:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 21:12     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe) from vfio Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm) " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/27] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/27] KVM: Remove KVM_MMIO as config option Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 20:53   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/27] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/27] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 21:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/27] KVM: arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 21:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` Steffen Eiden [this message]
2026-07-06 17:44   ` [PATCH v4 09/27] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/27] KVM: arm64: Refactor core-reset into a separate function Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/27] s390: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/27] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/27] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 14/27] KVM: s390: Move s390 kvm code into a subdirectory Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 15/27] KVM: S390: Prepare gmap for a second KVM implementation Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 16/27] KVM: s390: gmap: Refactor storage key and CMMA code into separate files Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 17/27] KVM: s390: Refactor prefix handling into a separate file Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 18/27] KVM: s390: Prepare kvm-s390 for a second kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 19/27] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:17   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 11:30     ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-06 11:58       ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:53     ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 20/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 21/27] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:50   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 22/27] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 23/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 12:15   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 20:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 24/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 25/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 26/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 27/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild Steffen Eiden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260706085229.979525-10-seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=fritz@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ggala@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hari55@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox