The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Kuen-Han Tsai <khtsai@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@gmail.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: hub: call ACPI _PRR reset during port power-cycle on enumeration failure
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 08:37:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026070612-customer-blitz-3e90@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFv23Q=jtz9fYH7zY+ByCOiA_KGNoyCkUh=FJBssqu7D_O0K1w@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 01:04:19PM +0800, AceLan Kao wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 於 2026年7月3日週五 下午5:43寫道:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 09:17:08AM +0800, Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) wrote:
> > > Some USB-connected devices (e.g. MT7925 Bluetooth on Dell laptops) expose
> > > their hardware reset line via an ACPI Power Resource for Reset (_PRR)
> > > rather than relying solely on VBUS cycling for recovery.  When the reset
> > > GPIO gets stuck low the device stops responding on USB; a VBUS power-cycle
> > > alone cannot recover it because the chip remains in reset regardless of
> > > VBUS state.
> > >
> > > Add usb_acpi_port_prr_reset() in usb-acpi.c that, given a hub device and
> > > one-based port number, looks up the port's ACPI companion handle, evaluates
> > > _PRR to obtain the power-resource reference, and then calls _RST on that
> > > reference to toggle the reset line.  The function is a no-op if the port
> > > has no ACPI handle or no _PRR method, so it is safe to call unconditionally
> > > for every port.
> > >
> > > Wire it into hub_port_connect() during the mid-retry VBUS power-cycle
> > > (at (PORT_INIT_TRIES-1)/2 iterations), calling usb_acpi_port_prr_reset()
> > > *after* VBUS goes off and *before* VBUS comes back on.  The ordering is
> > > critical: on the tested hardware the ACPI _RST method (MBTR._RST) drives
> > > BT_RST low for 200 ms then high again.  If _RST is called after VBUS is
> > > already restored the GPIO pulse races with device enumeration starting on
> > > the live bus; the device begins asserting USB signals while still held in
> > > reset and enumeration fails.  Performing the reset while the port is
> > > de-powered ensures the GPIO pulse completes fully before the device is
> > > given power and time to initialise.
> > >
> > > After VBUS is restored, add an msleep(100) conditional on _PRR._RST having
> > > succeeded.  USB 2.0 spec §7.1.7.3 (Fig. 7-29) mandates a minimum of 100 ms
> > > between VBUS power-on and the first reset signalling for power settling.
> > > On root hubs, hub_power_on_good_delay() returns bPwrOn2PwrGood * 2 with
> > > no minimum floor; on the tested xHCI root hub bPwrOn2PwrGood = 10, yielding
> > > only 20 ms — well below the spec minimum.  (External hubs already enforce
> > > a 100 ms minimum via hub_power_on_good_delay().)  When _PRR._RST has been
> > > exercised the device must also complete its full power-on sequence (GPIO
> > > de-assertion, internal oscillator start, firmware load) before USB
> > > enumeration begins.  The 100 ms sleep enforces the spec minimum and gives
> > > the device adequate settling time.
> > >
> > > Tested on a Dell laptop with MT7925 Bluetooth (idVendor=0489,
> > > idProduct=e139) whose BT_RST GPIO was stuck low.  With this fix the
> > > device recovers autonomously at boot without requiring a G3
> > > (mechanical power-off) cycle.  The relevant dmesg sequence:
> > >
> > >   [    1.448491] usb 3-10: new high-speed USB device number 4 using xhci_hcd
> > >   [    6.813942] usb 3-10: device descriptor read/64, error -110
> > >   [   22.685978] usb 3-10: device descriptor read/64, error -110
> > >   [   22.901715] usb 3-10: new high-speed USB device number 5 using xhci_hcd
> > >   [   28.317963] usb 3-10: device descriptor read/64, error -110
> > >   [   44.189949] usb 3-10: device descriptor read/64, error -110
> > >   [   44.294065] usb usb3-port10: attempt power cycle
> > >   [   44.872709] usb 3-10: new high-speed USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd
> > >   [   44.888293] usb 3-10: New USB device found, idVendor=0489, idProduct=e139, bcdDevice= 1.00
> > >   [   44.888318] usb 3-10: Manufacturer: MediaTek Inc.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/usb/core/hub.c      | 14 ++++++++
> > >  drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/usb/core/usb.h      |  3 ++
> > >  3 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > > index 24960ba9caa91..1740e96f73cc6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > > @@ -5603,11 +5603,25 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
> > >
> > >               /* When halfway through our retry count, power-cycle the port */
> > >               if (i == (PORT_INIT_TRIES - 1) / 2) {
> > > +                     int prr_reset;
> > > +
> > >                       dev_info(&port_dev->dev, "attempt power cycle\n");
> > >                       usb_hub_set_port_power(hdev, hub, port1, false);
> > >                       msleep(2 * hub_power_on_good_delay(hub));
> > > +                     prr_reset = usb_acpi_port_prr_reset(hdev, port1);
> > >                       usb_hub_set_port_power(hdev, hub, port1, true);
> > >                       msleep(hub_power_on_good_delay(hub));
> > > +                     /*
> > > +                      * USB 2.0 spec §7.1.7.3 requires at least 100 ms
> > > +                      * between VBUS power-on and the first reset for power
> > > +                      * settling.  hub_power_on_good_delay() on an xHCI root
> > > +                      * hub returns bPwrOn2PwrGood * 2 with no minimum floor,
> > > +                      * which can be as little as 20 ms.  When _PRR _RST was
> > > +                      * also exercised the device must complete its power-on
> > > +                      * sequence before enumeration; enforce the spec minimum.
> > > +                      */
> > > +                     if (prr_reset == 0)
> > > +                             msleep(100);
> > >               }
> > >       }
> > >       if (hub->hdev->parent ||
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c b/drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c
> > > index 489dbdc96f94a..ee62e3fd8e3a1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c
> > > @@ -142,6 +142,74 @@ int usb_acpi_set_power_state(struct usb_device *hdev, int index, bool enable)
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_acpi_set_power_state);
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * usb_acpi_port_prr_reset - issue an ACPI _PRR reset on a hub port
> > > + * @hdev: USB device belonging to the usb hub
> > > + * @port1: port number (one-based)
> > > + *
> > > + * Some devices expose their hardware reset line via an ACPI Power Resource for
> > > + * Reset (_PRR).  When such a device fails to enumerate (e.g. because the reset
> > > + * GPIO is stuck low), the USB power-cycle alone is not enough; the firmware
> > > + * reset path must also be exercised.
> > > + *
> > > + * This function evaluates _PRR on the port's ACPI companion to obtain the
> > > + * power-resource reference and then calls _RST on that resource to toggle the
> > > + * reset line.  It is intended to be called alongside the mid-retry VBUS
> > > + * power-cycle already performed by hub_port_connect().
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns 0 on success, -ENODEV if the port has no ACPI handle or no _PRR
> > > + * method, or a negative error code on failure.
> > > + */
> > > +int usb_acpi_port_prr_reset(struct usb_device *hdev, int port1)
> > > +{
> > > +     acpi_handle port_handle;
> > > +     struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> > > +     union acpi_object *pkg, *ref;
> > > +     acpi_status status;
> > > +     int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > +     port_handle = usb_get_hub_port_acpi_handle(hdev, port1);
> > > +     if (!port_handle)
> > > +             return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > +     if (!acpi_has_method(port_handle, "_PRR"))
> > > +             return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > +     status = acpi_evaluate_object(port_handle, "_PRR", NULL, &buffer);
> > > +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > > +             dev_dbg(&hdev->dev, "port%d: _PRR evaluation failed: %s\n",
> > > +                     port1, acpi_format_exception(status));
> > > +             return -ENODEV;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     pkg = buffer.pointer;
> > > +     if (!pkg || pkg->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || pkg->package.count < 1) {
> > > +             dev_dbg(&hdev->dev, "port%d: _PRR returned unexpected object\n",
> > > +                     port1);
> > > +             ret = -EINVAL;
> > > +             goto out;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     ref = &pkg->package.elements[0];
> > > +     if (ref->type != ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE || !ref->reference.handle) {
> > > +             dev_dbg(&hdev->dev, "port%d: _PRR element is not a reference\n",
> > > +                     port1);
> > > +             ret = -EINVAL;
> > > +             goto out;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     status = acpi_evaluate_object(ref->reference.handle, "_RST", NULL, NULL);
> > > +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > > +             dev_dbg(&hdev->dev, "port%d: _RST evaluation failed: %s\n",
> > > +                     port1, acpi_format_exception(status));
> > > +             ret = -EIO;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +out:
> > > +     kfree(buffer.pointer);
> > > +     return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * usb_acpi_add_usb4_devlink - add device link to USB4 Host Interface for tunneled USB3 devices
> > >   *
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/usb.h b/drivers/usb/core/usb.h
> > > index a9b37aeb515be..4d3dc3bd881b2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/core/usb.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/usb.h
> > > @@ -211,7 +211,10 @@ extern int usb_acpi_register(void);
> > >  extern void usb_acpi_unregister(void);
> > >  extern acpi_handle usb_get_hub_port_acpi_handle(struct usb_device *hdev,
> > >       int port1);
> > > +extern int usb_acpi_port_prr_reset(struct usb_device *hdev, int port1);
> > >  #else
> > >  static inline int usb_acpi_register(void) { return 0; };
> > >  static inline void usb_acpi_unregister(void) { };
> > > +static inline int usb_acpi_port_prr_reset(struct usb_device *hdev,
> > > +                                       int port1) { return -ENODEV; }
> > >  #endif
> > > --
> > > 2.53.0
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Please see the review comments at:
> >         https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260326011708.1128840-1-acelan.kao@canonical.com
> 
> Thanks Greg.
> 
> Went through the sashiko review. The single finding claims
> usb_acpi_port_prr_reset() should iterate every element of the _PRR
> package and call _RST on each. That's based on a misreading of _PRR.
> 
> Per ACPI 6.4 §7.3.26 (_PRR, Power Resource for Reset):
> 
>   "This object evaluates to a single reference to a power resource. ...
>    Return Value: A single element Package containing a Reference to the
>    power reset resource."
> 
> _PRR is a fixed single-element package, not a variable-length list.
> ACPICA encodes this in acpredef.h as ACPI_PTYPE1_FIXED with 1 reference
> (as opposed to _PR0/_PR1/_PR2/_PR3, which are ACPI_PTYPE1_VAR reference
> lists -- I suspect that's the source of the confusion). The "reset must
> affect all ACPI-described devices that reference it" wording in the _RST
> description refers to the devices sharing that one power resource, not to
> multiple resources in the package.
> 
> The two existing in-tree _PRR/_RST users take elements[0] and call _RST
> on it exactly as this patch does:
> 
>   - drivers/bluetooth/btintel.c: btintel_acpi_reset_method()
>   - drivers/net/.../iwlwifi/pcie/gen1_2/trans.c: iwl_trans_pcie_call_reset()
> 
> Both are in fact stricter -- they reject package.count != 1, whereas I
> accept count >= 1 and use the first element. Happy to tighten my check
> from "< 1" to "!= 1" to match that precedent and make the single-element
> invariant explicit, but there's no functional issue here.

This is going to require a review from the ACPI maintainer that this is
the correct thing to be doing, no matter which way it ends up.  So
please submit a new version and cc: those developers (and tighten up
your cc: list as well to only those that are relevant.)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-26  1:17 [PATCH] USB: hub: call ACPI _PRR reset during port power-cycle on enumeration failure Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2026-07-03  9:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-06  5:04   ` AceLan Kao
2026-07-06  6:37     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-07-06  8:26       ` AceLan Kao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026070612-customer-blitz-3e90@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=acelan.kao@canonical.com \
    --cc=chenyuan0y@gmail.com \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=khtsai@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox