From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Julian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com>
Cc: nsc@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, masahiroy@kernel.org,
grahamr@qti.qualcomm.com, nico@fluxnic.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: warn on dead default
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 22:31:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707053143.GA1381193@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260606140008.271929-1-julianbraha@gmail.com>
Hi Julian,
On Sat, Jun 06, 2026 at 03:00:08PM +0100, Julian Braha wrote:
> The dead default check was originally introduced with kconfirm:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6ec4df6d-1445-48ca-8f54-1d1a83c4716d@gmail.com/
>
> While I'm still working on that tool, it's not yet ready for inclusion
> into the tree. I am currently waiting for common distro packagers to
> package the parsing library before submitting the next RFC iteration.
>
> However, the dead default check is more impactful than the other checks:
> all 4 dead defaults that were detected should not have been dead and could
> cause misconfiguration bugs. But fortunately, these were just for kunit
> tests. The 3 patches to fix them have all since been merged:
> commit aef656a0e6c0 ("powerpc: fix dead default for GUEST_STATE_BUFFER_TEST")
> commit 30cc5e2ad826 ("s390/Kconfig: Cleanup defaults for selftests")
> commit df75430515c3 ("drm: fix dead default for DRM_TTM_KUNIT_TEST")
>
> We can actually check for dead defaults while evaluating Kconfig, which
> should be even more effective at preventing future instances than keeping
> it in a static checker.
>
> Note that this patch will only trigger a warning when the default values
> are different, in other words, pure duplicate defaults won't cause a
> warning, as they are simply redundant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com>
Nicolas pushed this into -next, where it fires several times for me. I
have not looked at these closely yet, I just wanted to get the report
out so that more eyes could be on it.
ARCH=powerpc allmodconfig:
arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype:269:warning: default for 'TUNE_CPU' has the same condition as the earlier default at arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype:268
arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype:270:warning: default for 'TUNE_CPU' has the same condition as the earlier default at arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype:268
lib/Kconfig.debug:1083:warning: default for 'PANIC_TIMEOUT' is unreachable: earlier default at arch/powerpc/Kconfig:350 is unconditional
arch/Kconfig:1194:warning: default for 'PGTABLE_LEVELS' is unreachable: earlier default at arch/powerpc/Kconfig:482 is unconditional
ARCH=s390 allmodconfig:
arch/Kconfig:1194:warning: default for 'PGTABLE_LEVELS' is unreachable: earlier default at arch/s390/Kconfig:295 is unconditional
lib/Kconfig:372:warning: default for 'HAS_IOMEM' is unreachable: earlier default at arch/s390/Kconfig:760 is unconditional
When building with clang-23, which supports '-fms-anonymous-struct':
init/Kconfig:978:warning: default for 'CC_MS_EXTENSIONS' is unreachable: earlier default at init/Kconfig:977 is unconditional
I think the init/Kconfig and arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype ones
are intentional due to how cc-option works but I know those might be
hard to silence because they are already evaluated by this stage if I
understand correctly? Not sure about the other ones (apologies if they
are already known or have fixes).
--
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-06 14:00 [PATCH] kconfig: warn on dead default Julian Braha
2026-06-06 14:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2026-06-06 15:01 ` Julian Braha
2026-06-06 17:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2026-07-07 5:31 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2026-07-07 6:06 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-07-07 8:32 ` Julian Braha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260707053143.GA1381193@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=grahamr@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=julianbraha@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox