From: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com, shuah@kernel.org,
mmullins@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover negative raw_tp writable buffer offsets
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 23:08:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707060804.93561-3-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707060804.93561-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
Add raw tracepoint writable coverage for buffer accesses involving
negative constant pointer adjustments.
The verifier case checks that a negative effective offset is rejected.
The attach-time case adds incremental coverage beyond the existing nbd
test and the verifier rejection case: it uses a negative var_off and a
positive instruction offset whose effective offset remains non-negative.
This exercises the checked access_end accounting path and verifies that
the resulting max_tp_access is still checked against nbd_send_request's
writable size at attach time.
Signed-off-by: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
---
.../raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c | 58 +++++++++++--------
.../bpf/progs/verifier_raw_tp_writable.c | 16 +++++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c
index 216b0dfac0fe..efe4cad47b28 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c
@@ -4,12 +4,31 @@
#include <linux/nbd.h>
#include "bpf_util.h"
-void test_raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid(void)
+static void check_nbd_attach_reject(const char *name,
+ const struct bpf_insn *program, size_t prog_len)
{
- __u32 duration = 0;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts);
char error[4096];
- int bpf_fd = -1, tp_fd = -1;
+ int bpf_fd, tp_fd;
+
+ opts.log_level = 2;
+ opts.log_buf = error;
+ opts.log_size = sizeof(error);
+
+ bpf_fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE, NULL, "GPL v2",
+ program, prog_len, &opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(bpf_fd, 0, "prog_load"))
+ return;
+
+ tp_fd = bpf_raw_tracepoint_open("nbd_send_request", bpf_fd);
+ if (!ASSERT_LT(tp_fd, 0, name))
+ close(tp_fd);
+
+ close(bpf_fd);
+}
+void test_raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid(void)
+{
const struct bpf_insn program[] = {
/* r6 is our tp buffer */
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
@@ -19,25 +38,18 @@ void test_raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid(void)
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
};
- LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
- .log_level = 2,
- .log_buf = error,
- .log_size = sizeof(error),
- );
-
- bpf_fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE, NULL, "GPL v2",
- program, ARRAY_SIZE(program),
- &opts);
- if (CHECK(bpf_fd < 0, "bpf_raw_tracepoint_writable load",
- "failed: %d errno %d\n", bpf_fd, errno))
- return;
-
- tp_fd = bpf_raw_tracepoint_open("nbd_send_request", bpf_fd);
- if (CHECK(tp_fd >= 0, "bpf_raw_tracepoint_writable open",
- "erroneously succeeded\n"))
- goto out_bpffd;
+ const struct bpf_insn negative_var_off_program[] = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ /* make var_off negative, but keep the effective access offset non-negative */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+ /* one byte beyond the end of the nbd_request struct */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6,
+ sizeof(struct nbd_request) + 8),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ };
- close(tp_fd);
-out_bpffd:
- close(bpf_fd);
+ check_nbd_attach_reject("nbd_invalid", program, ARRAY_SIZE(program));
+ check_nbd_attach_reject("nbd_invalid_negative_var_off",
+ negative_var_off_program,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(negative_var_off_program));
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_raw_tp_writable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_raw_tp_writable.c
index 14a0172e2141..4055a6443bc2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_raw_tp_writable.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_raw_tp_writable.c
@@ -47,4 +47,20 @@ l0_%=: /* shift the buffer pointer to a variable location */\
: __clobber_all);
}
+SEC("raw_tracepoint.w")
+__description("raw_tracepoint_writable: reject negative const offset")
+__failure
+__msg("invalid negative tracepoint buffer offset")
+__naked void tracepoint_writable_reject_negative_const_offset(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0); \
+ r6 += -8; \
+ r0 = *(u64 *)(r6 + 0); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ :
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.43.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 6:08 [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf: Reject negative const offsets for buffer pointers Sun Jian
2026-07-07 6:08 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] " Sun Jian
2026-07-07 7:17 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2026-07-07 8:38 ` sun jian
2026-07-07 6:08 ` Sun Jian [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260707060804.93561-3-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
--to=sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mmullins@fb.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox