The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Jinjie Ruan" <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Guo Ren" <guoren@kernel.org>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
	"Yoshinori Sato" <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Chris Zankel" <chris@zankel.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"Shrikanth Hegde" <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, "Paul Walmsley" <pjw@kernel.org>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Vineet Gupta" <vgupta@kernel.org>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, "Brian Cain" <bcain@kernel.org>,
	"Michal Simek" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Andreas Larsson" <andreas@gaisler.com>,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	"Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 11/18] seccomp, treewide: Rename and convert __secure_computing() to return boolean
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 21:06:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707190254.230735780@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20260707181957.433213175@kernel.org

From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

The return value of __secure_computing() currently uses 0 to indicate
that a system call should be allowed, and -1 to indicate that it should
be blocked/killed. This 0/-1 pattern is non-intuitive for a security
check function and makes the control flow at the call sites less readable.

Furthermore, any potential future changes to these return values would
require a high-risk, error-prone audit of all its users across different
architectures.

Sanitize this logic by converting the return type of __secure_computing()
to a proper boolean, where 'true' explicitly means 'allow' and 'false'
means 'fail/deny'.

Update all the two dozen or so call sites across the tree to align with
this new boolean semantic. No functional changes are intended, as the
callers still return -1 to the lower-level assembly entry code upon
seccomp denial.

Rename the function to __seccomp_permit_syscall() so that the purpose is
entirely clear.

[ tglx: Rename the function ]

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
---
 arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c            |    2 -
 arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c              |    2 -
 arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c            |    2 -
 arch/csky/kernel/ptrace.c             |    2 -
 arch/m68k/kernel/ptrace.c             |    2 -
 arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c             |    2 -
 arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c           |    2 -
 arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c            |    2 -
 arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c         |    2 -
 arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c |   14 ++++++-------
 arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c           |    3 --
 include/linux/entry-common.h          |    9 +++-----
 include/linux/seccomp.h               |   12 +++++------
 kernel/seccomp.c                      |   35 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
 14 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ asmlinkage unsigned long syscall_trace_e
 	 * If this fails, seccomp may already have set up the return value
 	 * (e.g. SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO / TRACE).
 	 */
-	if (secure_computing() == -1) {
+	if (!seccomp_permit_syscall()) {
 		if (regs->r19 == 0 && regs->r0 == (unsigned long)-1)
 			syscall_set_return_value(current, regs, -ENOSYS, 0);
 		syscall_set_nr(current, regs, -1);
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(struc
 
 	/* Do seccomp after ptrace; syscall may have changed. */
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
-	if (secure_computing() == -1)
+	if (!seccomp_permit_syscall())
 		return -1;
 #else
 	/* XXX: remove this once OABI gets fixed */
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@ int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *
 	}
 
 	/* Do the secure computing after ptrace; failures should be fast. */
-	if (secure_computing() == -1)
+	if (!seccomp_permit_syscall())
 		return NO_SYSCALL;
 
 	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))
--- a/arch/csky/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/csky/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(struc
 		if (ptrace_report_syscall_entry(regs))
 			return -1;
 
-	if (secure_computing() == -1)
+	if (!seccomp_permit_syscall())
 		return -1;
 
 	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(void)
 	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
 		ret = ptrace_report_syscall_entry(task_pt_regs(current));
 
-	if (secure_computing() == -1)
+	if (!seccomp_permit_syscall())
 		return -1;
 
 	return ret;
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ asmlinkage long syscall_trace_enter(stru
 			return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (secure_computing())
+	if (!seccomp_permit_syscall())
 		return -1;
 
 	if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)))
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_re
 	}
 
 	/* Do the secure computing check after ptrace. */
-	if (secure_computing() == -1)
+	if (!seccomp_permit_syscall())
 		return -1;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ asmlinkage long do_syscall_trace_enter(s
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (secure_computing() == -1)
+	if (!seccomp_permit_syscall())
 		return -1;
 
 	if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)))
--- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ void handle_syscall(struct uml_pt_regs *
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Do the seccomp check after ptrace; failures should be fast. */
-	if (secure_computing() == -1)
+	if (!seccomp_permit_syscall())
 		goto out;
 
 	syscall = UPT_SYSCALL_NR(r);
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
@@ -118,10 +118,10 @@ static bool write_ok_or_segv(unsigned lo
 
 static bool __emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
 {
-	unsigned long caller;
-	int vsyscall_nr, syscall_nr, tmp;
+	unsigned long caller, orig_dx;
+	int vsyscall_nr, syscall_nr;
+	bool skip;
 	long ret;
-	unsigned long orig_dx;
 
 	/* Confirm that the fault happened in 64-bit user mode */
 	if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
@@ -197,16 +197,16 @@ static bool __emulate_vsyscall(struct pt
 	 */
 	regs->orig_ax = syscall_nr;
 	regs->ax = -ENOSYS;
-	tmp = secure_computing();
-	if ((!tmp && regs->orig_ax != syscall_nr) || regs->ip != address) {
+	skip = !seccomp_permit_syscall();
+	if ((!skip && regs->orig_ax != syscall_nr) || regs->ip != address) {
 		warn_bad_vsyscall(KERN_DEBUG, regs,
 				  "seccomp tried to change syscall nr or ip");
 		force_exit_sig(SIGSYS);
 		return true;
 	}
 	regs->orig_ax = -1;
-	if (tmp)
-		goto do_ret;  /* skip requested */
+	if (skip)
+		goto do_ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * With a real vsyscall, page faults cause SIGSEGV.
--- a/arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -553,8 +553,7 @@ int do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_reg
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (regs->syscall == NO_SYSCALL ||
-	    secure_computing() == -1) {
+	if (regs->syscall == NO_SYSCALL || !seccomp_permit_syscall()) {
 		do_syscall_trace_leave(regs);
 		return 0;
 	}
--- a/include/linux/entry-common.h
+++ b/include/linux/entry-common.h
@@ -102,9 +102,8 @@ static __always_inline long syscall_trac
 
 	/* Do seccomp after ptrace, to catch any tracer changes. */
 	if (work & SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP) {
-		ret = __secure_computing();
-		if (ret == -1L)
-			return ret;
+		if (!__seccomp_permit_syscall())
+			return -1L;
 	}
 
 	/* Either of the above might have changed the syscall number */
@@ -115,7 +114,7 @@ static __always_inline long syscall_trac
 
 	syscall_enter_audit(regs, syscall);
 
-	return ret ? : syscall;
+	return syscall;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -138,7 +137,7 @@ static __always_inline long syscall_trac
  * It handles the following work items:
  *
  *  1) syscall_work flag dependent invocations of
- *     ptrace_report_syscall_entry(), __secure_computing(), trace_sys_enter()
+ *     ptrace_report_syscall_entry(), __seccomp_permit_syscall(), trace_sys_enter()
  *  2) Invocation of audit_syscall_entry()
  */
 static __always_inline long syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall)
--- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
+++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
@@ -22,14 +22,14 @@
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <asm/seccomp.h>
 
-extern int __secure_computing(void);
+extern bool __seccomp_permit_syscall(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
-static inline int secure_computing(void)
+static __always_inline bool seccomp_permit_syscall(void)
 {
 	if (unlikely(test_syscall_work(SECCOMP)))
-		return  __secure_computing();
-	return 0;
+		return  __seccomp_permit_syscall();
+	return true;
 }
 #else
 extern void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall);
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct se
 struct seccomp_data;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
-static inline int secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
+static inline bool seccomp_permit_syscall(void) { return true; }
 #else
 static inline void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall) { return; }
 #endif
-static inline int __secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
+static inline bool __seccomp_permit_syscall(void) { return true; }
 
 static inline long prctl_get_seccomp(void)
 {
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1100,12 +1100,13 @@ void secure_computing_strict(int this_sy
 	else
 		BUG();
 }
-int __secure_computing(void)
+
+bool __seccomp_permit_syscall(void)
 {
 	int this_syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, current_pt_regs());
 
 	secure_computing_strict(this_syscall);
-	return 0;
+	return true;
 }
 #else
 
@@ -1256,7 +1257,7 @@ static int seccomp_do_user_notification(
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
+static bool __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
 {
 	u32 filter_ret, action;
 	struct seccomp_data sd;
@@ -1294,7 +1295,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_sys
 	case SECCOMP_RET_TRACE:
 		/* We've been put in this state by the ptracer already. */
 		if (recheck_after_trace)
-			return 0;
+			return true;
 
 		/* ENOSYS these calls if there is no tracer attached. */
 		if (!ptrace_event_enabled(current, PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP)) {
@@ -1330,19 +1331,19 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_sys
 		 * a skip would have already been reported.
 		 */
 		if (__seccomp_filter(this_syscall, true))
-			return -1;
+			return false;
 
-		return 0;
+		return true;
 
 	case SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF:
 		if (seccomp_do_user_notification(this_syscall, match, &sd))
 			goto skip;
 
-		return 0;
+		return true;
 
 	case SECCOMP_RET_LOG:
 		seccomp_log(this_syscall, 0, action, true);
-		return 0;
+		return true;
 
 	case SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW:
 		/*
@@ -1350,7 +1351,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_sys
 		 * this action since SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW is the starting
 		 * state in seccomp_run_filters().
 		 */
-		return 0;
+		return true;
 
 	case SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD:
 	case SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS:
@@ -1367,46 +1368,46 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_sys
 		} else {
 			do_exit(SIGSYS);
 		}
-		return -1; /* skip the syscall go directly to signal handling */
+		return false; /* skip the syscall go directly to signal handling */
 	}
 
 	unreachable();
 
 skip:
 	seccomp_log(this_syscall, 0, action, match ? match->log : false);
-	return -1;
+	return false;
 }
 #else
-static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
+static bool __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
 {
 	BUG();
 
-	return -1;
+	return false;
 }
 #endif
 
-int __secure_computing(void)
+bool __seccomp_permit_syscall(void)
 {
 	int mode = current->seccomp.mode;
 	int this_syscall;
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) &&
 	    unlikely(current->ptrace & PT_SUSPEND_SECCOMP))
-		return 0;
+		return true;
 
 	this_syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, current_pt_regs());
 
 	switch (mode) {
 	case SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT:
 		__secure_computing_strict(this_syscall);  /* may call do_exit */
-		return 0;
+		return true;
 	case SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER:
 		return __seccomp_filter(this_syscall, false);
 	/* Surviving SECCOMP_RET_KILL_* must be proactively impossible. */
 	case SECCOMP_MODE_DEAD:
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		do_exit(SIGKILL);
-		return -1;
+		return false;
 	default:
 		BUG();
 	}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-07 19:05 [patch 00/18] entry: Consolidate and rework syscall entry handling Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-07 19:05 ` [patch 01/18] powerpc: Move stack randomization after syscall_enter_from_user_mode() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 14:07   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-08 17:22   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-09  1:20   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 11:12   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 02/18] randomize_kstack: Provide add_random_kstack_offset_irqsoff() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 17:24   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-09  2:13   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 03/18] entry: Provide [syscall_]enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 17:26   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-09  2:34   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09  3:46   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 11:15   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 04/18] loongarch/syscall: Use syscall_enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 18:37   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-09  2:37   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 11:15   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 05/18] powerpc/syscall: " Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 18:35   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-09  2:38   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 11:16   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 06/18] riscv/syscall: " Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 20:57   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-09  2:38   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 11:16   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 07/18] s390/syscall: Use enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08  6:47   ` Sven Schnelle
2026-07-08 20:57   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-09  2:39   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09  2:46   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 11:17     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 08/18] x86/syscall: Use [syscall_]enter_from_user_mode_randomize_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 20:59   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-09  2:44   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 11:18   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 09/18] entry: Remove syscall_enter_from_user_mode() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 21:21   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-08 22:08     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-09  2:49   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 10/18] entry: Use syscall number instead of rereading it Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 21:39   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-09  2:55   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 11:20   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-07-09 11:22     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-07-07 19:06 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-07-08  1:43   ` [patch 11/18] seccomp, treewide: Rename and convert __secure_computing() to return boolean Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-08  9:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 16:04       ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-08 21:49         ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-09 16:22   ` Kees Cook
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 12/18] ptrace, treewide: Rename ptrace_report_syscall_entry() to ptrace_report_syscall_permit_entry() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 15:46   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-09  1:41   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09  8:41   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-07-09 17:03   ` Radu Rendec
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 13/18] entry: Make trace_syscall_enter() return type bool Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 15:52   ` Michal Suchánek
2026-07-08 20:34     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08 23:14       ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-09 16:26         ` David Laight
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 14/18] entry: Make return type of syscall_trace_enter() bool Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-07 19:06 ` [patch 15/18] x86/entry: Make syscall functions static Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-09  1:47   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-07 19:07 ` [patch 16/18] x86/entry: Get rid of the sys_ni_syscall() indirection Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-09  2:03   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-07 19:07 ` [patch 17/18] x86/entry: Simplify the syscall number logic Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-07 19:07 ` [patch 18/18] entry, treewide: Make syscall_enter_from_user_mode[_work]() indicate syscall execution Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-08  5:21   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-08  9:16     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260707190254.230735780@kernel.org \
    --to=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcain@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=vgupta@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox