From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdf.kernel@gmail.com,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] nfc: llcp: convert to getsockopt_iter
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 04:51:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708-getsockopt_phase3-v1-2-d8394f2fc554@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-getsockopt_phase3-v1-0-d8394f2fc554@debian.org>
Convert nfc_llcp_getsockopt() to the getsockopt_iter proto_ops callback.
It takes a sockopt_t and writes each value with copy_to_iter() instead of
a put_user() into optval; the socket layer builds the sockopt_t and copies
the length back. The socket lock and optlen validation are unchanged.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
index 94850fbe3620d..0f9cd03294074 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
@@ -302,21 +302,20 @@ static int nfc_llcp_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
}
static int nfc_llcp_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
+ sockopt_t *opt)
{
struct nfc_llcp_local *local;
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
struct nfc_llcp_sock *llcp_sock = nfc_llcp_sock(sk);
+ u32 miux, remote_miu, remote_lto, remote_rw, rw;
int len, err = 0;
- u32 miux, remote_miu, rw;
pr_debug("%p optname %d\n", sk, optname);
if (level != SOL_NFC)
return -ENOPROTOOPT;
- if (get_user(len, optlen))
- return -EFAULT;
+ len = opt->optlen;
if (len < 0)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -337,7 +336,7 @@ static int nfc_llcp_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
switch (optname) {
case NFC_LLCP_RW:
rw = llcp_sock->rw > LLCP_MAX_RW ? local->rw : llcp_sock->rw;
- if (put_user(rw, (u32 __user *) optval))
+ if (copy_to_iter(&rw, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
err = -EFAULT;
break;
@@ -346,7 +345,7 @@ static int nfc_llcp_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
miux = be16_to_cpu(llcp_sock->miux) > LLCP_MAX_MIUX ?
be16_to_cpu(local->miux) : be16_to_cpu(llcp_sock->miux);
- if (put_user(miux, (u32 __user *) optval))
+ if (copy_to_iter(&miux, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
err = -EFAULT;
break;
@@ -355,19 +354,21 @@ static int nfc_llcp_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
remote_miu = llcp_sock->remote_miu > LLCP_MAX_MIU ?
local->remote_miu : llcp_sock->remote_miu;
- if (put_user(remote_miu, (u32 __user *) optval))
+ if (copy_to_iter(&remote_miu, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
err = -EFAULT;
break;
case NFC_LLCP_REMOTE_LTO:
- if (put_user(local->remote_lto / 10, (u32 __user *) optval))
+ remote_lto = local->remote_lto / 10;
+ if (copy_to_iter(&remote_lto, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
err = -EFAULT;
break;
case NFC_LLCP_REMOTE_RW:
- if (put_user(llcp_sock->remote_rw, (u32 __user *) optval))
+ remote_rw = llcp_sock->remote_rw;
+ if (copy_to_iter(&remote_rw, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
err = -EFAULT;
break;
@@ -379,8 +380,7 @@ static int nfc_llcp_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
release_sock(sk);
- if (put_user(len, optlen))
- return -EFAULT;
+ opt->optlen = len;
return err;
}
@@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops llcp_sock_ops = {
.listen = llcp_sock_listen,
.shutdown = sock_no_shutdown,
.setsockopt = nfc_llcp_setsockopt,
- .getsockopt = nfc_llcp_getsockopt,
+ .getsockopt_iter = nfc_llcp_getsockopt,
.sendmsg = llcp_sock_sendmsg,
.recvmsg = llcp_sock_recvmsg,
.mmap = sock_no_mmap,
--
2.53.0-Meta
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 11:51 [PATCH net-next 0/2] nfc: llcp: Move to .getsockopt_iter Breno Leitao
2026-07-08 11:51 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] nfc: llcp: widen getsockopt value locals to u32 Breno Leitao
2026-07-08 11:51 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708-getsockopt_phase3-v1-2-d8394f2fc554@debian.org \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox