From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@strace.io>
To: Renzo Davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>,
Davide Berardi <berardi.dav@gmail.com>,
strace-devel@lists.strace.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ptrace: add PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO syscall skipping support
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 18:32:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708153250.GA32399@strace.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708090655.38432-2-renzo@cs.unibo.it>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Renzo Davoli wrote:
> Extend PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO to support skipping a system call triggered
> via seccomp.
>
> When a tracer retrieves a ptrace_syscall_info structure with 'op' set to
> PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_SECCOMP, it can now choose to skip the system call.
> To do this, the tracer changes 'op' to PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_EXIT and
> populates the exit union fields (rval and is_error) to define the return
> value and error status for the tracee.
>
> System call suppression for PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_ENTRY is currently omitted
> because its implementation is architecture-dependent. On some architectures,
> the system call number and return value share the same register, making it
> difficult to suppress a system call without altering the return value. A
> portable implementation would require an audit of all supported architectures.
I suggest the following wording for the explanation why
PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_ENTRY is not supported yet:
System call suppression via PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_ENTRY is currently not
implemented. On some architectures (e.g. MIPS), when a system call
is skipped by setting the syscall number to -1 at the entry stop, the
architecture entry path unconditionally overwrites the return value
register with -ENOSYS before the tracer can set a custom return value
at the exit stop. A portable implementation of entry-based syscall
suppression would require an audit of all supported architectures
to ensure the tracer-provided return value is preserved.
--
ldv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 9:06 [PATCH v4 0/2] PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO: add support for seccomp syscall skipping Renzo Davoli
2026-07-08 9:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ptrace: add PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO syscall skipping support Renzo Davoli
2026-07-08 15:32 ` Dmitry V. Levin [this message]
2026-07-08 15:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-08 22:09 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2026-07-09 6:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-08 9:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/ptrace: add a test case for PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO syscall skipping Renzo Davoli
2026-07-08 9:57 ` Dmitry V. Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708153250.GA32399@strace.io \
--to=ldv@strace.io \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=berardi.dav@gmail.com \
--cc=evgsyr@gmail.com \
--cc=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=renzo@cs.unibo.it \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=strace-devel@lists.strace.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox