From: Ibrahim Hashimov <security@auditcode.ai>
To: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: validate num_sge/cur_sge before indexing wqe->dma.sge[]
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 00:45:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708224534.1206-1-security@auditcode.ai> (raw)
A user QP's send queue (qp->sq.queue) is a shared ring the userspace
application writes to directly via mmap (vmalloc_user(), see
rxe_queue.c). For such a QP, rxe_post_send() takes the qp->is_user
branch and only schedules the requester task -- it never validates or
copies the posted WQE:
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c:
if (qp->is_user) {
rxe_sched_task(&qp->send_task);
...
}
The requester then consumes the WQE in place straight out of that
mmap'd ring:
rxe_req.c: wqe = req_next_wqe(qp);
rxe_req.c: err = copy_data(qp->pd, 0, &wqe->dma,
payload_addr(pkt), payload,
RXE_FROM_MR_OBJ);
copy_data() immediately indexes the per-WQE sge array with the
attacker-controlled cur_sge field, before any bound is checked:
rxe_mr.c: struct rxe_sge *sge = &dma->sge[dma->cur_sge];
rxe_mr.c: ...
rxe_mr.c: if (sge->length && (offset < sge->length)) {
dma->sge[] is a flex array whose real backing storage is exactly
qp->sq.max_sge entries per WQE slot (see rxe_qp.c, wqe_size computed
from max_sge at QP create time). Since a user QP's WQE bytes are
entirely attacker-supplied, both wqe->dma.num_sge and wqe->dma.cur_sge
can be set to arbitrary values independent of each other and of
max_sge. Only the *kernel*-QP post path bounds num_sge:
rxe_verbs.c: validate_send_wr()
if (num_sge > sq->max_sge) {
rxe_err_qp(qp, "num_sge > max_sge\n");
but that function is only reachable from rxe_post_one_send() for
kernel-owned QPs; it is never consulted for a user QP's raw WQE.
The sibling receive path already has the equivalent guard, with the
literal comment documenting exactly why it is required:
rxe_resp.c: get_srq_wqe()
/* don't trust user space data */
if (unlikely(wqe->dma.num_sge > srq->rq.max_sge)) {
...
rxe_dbg_qp(qp, "invalid num_sge in SRQ entry\n");
return RESPST_ERR_MALFORMED_WQE;
}
The send/requester path has no analogous check, so a local,
unprivileged user who can open /dev/infiniband/uverbs* and create a
user QP on a soft-RoCE (rxe) link can hand-craft a WQE in the shared
send queue with an out-of-range wqe->dma.cur_sge (or an oversized
wqe->dma.num_sge) and ring the send doorbell. rxe_requester() then
calls copy_data(), which dereferences &dma->sge[cur_sge] out of the
bounds of the per-WQE sge array -- a vmalloc out-of-bounds *read*
(confirmed via KASAN: "KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in copy_data"),
reliably panicking the kernel (local DoS). sge->addr itself is still
bounds-checked later by lookup_mr()/rxe_mr_copy(), so the primitive is
an OOB read of sge metadata, not an arbitrary read/write primitive.
Fix this the same way get_srq_wqe() already does for SRQ entries:
bound both fields pulled from the (possibly user-mapped) send queue
entry before they are ever used to index wqe->dma.sge[], right where
the requester fetches the next WQE off the ring in rxe_requester().
num_sge is capped at qp->sq.max_sge (matching the sibling SRQ check
and the kernel-QP validate_send_wr() check), and cur_sge is capped at
qp->sq.max_sge directly, since that is the true per-WQE array capacity
that copy_data() indexes into -- this also covers num_sge == 0 /
cur_sge == 0 local-op and zero-payload WQEs, which remain valid.
This is a long-standing bug in the rxe (soft-RoCE) driver: the
qp->is_user bypass in rxe_post_send() and the unbounded
&dma->sge[dma->cur_sge] indexing in copy_data() have been present
since the driver was introduced.
Runtime-verified on a v6.19 KASAN (CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC=y) stand: a
reproducer that posts a user QP send WQE with an out-of-range
cur_sge reliably tripped "KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in
copy_data" (an out-of-bounds read) before this patch, and no longer
triggers that report with the patch applied.
Fixes: 8700e3e7c485 ("Soft RoCE driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ibrahim Hashimov <security@auditcode.ai>
Assisted-by: AuditCode-AI:2026.07
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
index 12d03f390b09..9fb2c49fb503 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
@@ -701,6 +701,22 @@ int rxe_requester(struct rxe_qp *qp)
if (unlikely(!wqe))
goto exit;
+ /*
+ * Don't trust user space data: qp->sq.queue is a raw ring the
+ * application writes directly for a user QP, so wqe->dma.num_sge
+ * and wqe->dma.cur_sge must be bounds-checked the same way
+ * get_srq_wqe() checks an SRQ entry's num_sge before it is used.
+ * Otherwise copy_data() indexes wqe->dma.sge[wqe->dma.cur_sge]
+ * with an unvalidated, attacker-controlled index/count and reads
+ * out of bounds of the per-wqe sge array.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(wqe->dma.num_sge > qp->sq.max_sge ||
+ wqe->dma.cur_sge >= qp->sq.max_sge)) {
+ rxe_dbg_qp(qp, "invalid num_sge/cur_sge in send wqe\n");
+ wqe->status = IB_WC_LOC_QP_OP_ERR;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
if (rxe_wqe_is_fenced(qp, wqe)) {
qp->req.wait_fence = 1;
goto exit;
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 22:45 Ibrahim Hashimov [this message]
2026-07-09 2:38 ` [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: validate num_sge/cur_sge before indexing wqe->dma.sge[] yanjun.zhu
2026-07-09 7:26 ` Ibrahim Hashimov
2026-07-09 7:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Ibrahim Hashimov
2026-07-09 18:37 ` yanjun.zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708224534.1206-1-security@auditcode.ai \
--to=security@auditcode.ai \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox