From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Haoning.CHENG@cn.bosch.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: thermal: imx: Document calibration offset property
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 18:47:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709-send-mashed-bac8c44ead01@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ak-5KdXFUldV2eTP@SMW015318>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3243 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 10:07:21AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 04:10:21PM +0800, HaoNing Cheng via B4 Relay wrote:
> > [You don't often get email from devnull+haoning.cheng.cn.bosch.com@kernel.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> >
> > From: HaoNing Cheng <Haoning.CHENG@cn.bosch.com>
> >
> > Some boards need a small per-design correction to align the reported CPU
> > temperature with board-level measurements.
> >
> > Document the optional fsl,temp-calibration-offset-millicelsius property,
> > a signed offset in millicelsius that is added to the calculated sensor
> > temperature.
>
> why board difference cause such offset, I suppose it is cause by SoC
> variance. The offset may difference if you change to another chip. another
> words, if you have 1000 boards, Is this offset the same?
I think your "in other words" section here is confusing.
You're asking about "1000 boards", which would imply that it is 1000 of
the same design of board. The commit message says that the variance is
between designs. If 1000 of the same design of board have the same offset,
but 2 boards with different designs have different ones then this
property seems fair. Of course, if the variance is determined by the SoC
in use, then this should be deduced from the compatible, but the commit
message seems to be fairly clear about it not being SoC related.
>
>
> > The property is optional and the existing behaviour is kept
> > when it is omitted.
> >
> > Update the binding example to show its usage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: HaoNing Cheng <Haoning.CHENG@cn.bosch.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/imx-thermal.yaml | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/imx-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/imx-thermal.yaml
> > index 949b154856c5..eb7243a7ebaf 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/imx-thermal.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/imx-thermal.yaml
> > @@ -59,6 +59,13 @@ properties:
> > clocks:
> > maxItems: 1
> >
> > + fsl,temp-calibration-offset-millicelsius:
> > + maxItems: 1
>
> suppose it int32, why need maxItems here?
"-millicelsius$":
$ref: types.yaml#/definitions/int32-array
What's missing are constraints on the max and min I think though.
pw-bot: changes-requested
Thanks,
Conor.
>
> Frank
>
> > + description:
> > + A signed calibration offset, in millicelsius, added to the calculated
> > + sensor temperature to compensate for board-level measurement
> > + differences. When absent, no offset is applied.
> > +
> > "#thermal-sensor-cells":
> > const: 0
> >
> > @@ -109,6 +116,7 @@ examples:
> > nvmem-cells = <&tempmon_calib>, <&tempmon_temp_grade>;
> > nvmem-cell-names = "calib", "temp_grade";
> > clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_PLL3_USB_OTG>;
> > + fsl,temp-calibration-offset-millicelsius = <(-6400)>;
> > #thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 8:10 [PATCH v2 0/2] thermal: imx: Add calibration offset support HaoNing Cheng via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: thermal: imx: Document calibration offset property HaoNing Cheng via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 15:07 ` Frank Li
2026-07-09 17:47 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-07-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal/drivers/imx: Add calibration offset support HaoNing Cheng via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709-send-mashed-bac8c44ead01@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=Haoning.CHENG@cn.bosch.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox