Re: [PATCH v4] Bluetooth: virtio: Fix virtbt_probe() init and cleanup

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 03:28:17PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 07:47:45PM +0800, Haoxiang Li wrote:
> > virtbt_probe() allocates vbt before setting up the virtqueues, but some
> > failure paths return without freeing it.
> > 
> > The probe path also registers the HCI device before the virtio transport
> > is opened. Since hci_register_dev() makes the HCI device visible and queues
> > power_on work, move it after virtio_device_ready() and virtbt_open_vdev()
> > so the transport is ready before the HCI core can use it.
> > 
> > On failures after DRIVER_OK, reset and close the virtio device before
> > deleting the virtqueues and freeing vbt. This also cancels pending rx work
> > before vbt is freed.
> > 
> > Fixes: afd2daa26c7a ("Bluetooth: Add support for virtio transport driver")
> > Fixes: dc65b4b0f90a ("Bluetooth: virtio_bt: fix device removal")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Haoxiang Li <haoxiang_li2024@163.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> >  - Rework virtbt_probe() error paths into an unwind ladder.
> >  - Free vbt on probe failures.
> >  - Reset the virtio device and unregister the HCI device before freeing it
> >    when virtbt_open_vdev() fails.
> >  - Close the virtio device before unregistering the HCI device in remove().
> > 
> >    Thanks Dan for the suggestions. The blog is very helpful.
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> >  - Remove virtio_reset_device() from the virtbt_open_vdev() failure path.
> > 
> > Changes in v4:
> >  - Move hci_register_dev() after virtio_device_ready() and virtbt_open_vdev().
> >  - Reset and close the virtio device on probe failures after DRIVER_OK. Thanks, Luiz!
> 
> These are Sashiko warnings.  To be honest, I would feel really
> uncomfortable blindly applying them without testing.  If someone
> can test, then great.  Otherwise, I would probably apply v3.  The
> stuff that Sashiko complained about was all pre-existing issues
> even though for the last one it said it wasn't but it was.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

why make changes at all if no one can test. in fact, why have a driver
then.

-- 
MST