From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Miu <jasonmiu@google.com>,
Jork Loeser <jloeser@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 14/21] kho: initialize kho_scratch pointer earlier in boot
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 19:38:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709173821.429921-15-pratyush@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709173821.429921-1-pratyush@kernel.org>
From: "Pratyush Yadav (Google)" <pratyush@kernel.org>
In a future patch, mm init will use kho_scratch_overlap() for deciding
the migrate type of pageblocks it initializes. The earliest user
currently is free_area_init(). kho_scratch_overlap()
relies on kho_scratch pointer being initialized. Introduce
kho_memory_init_early() to do this.
kho_populate() would normally be a good place to do this, but
unfortunately, phys_to_virt() does not work at that point on ARM64. So
we need yet another initialization function.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav (Google) <pratyush@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/kexec_handover.h | 3 +++
kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
mm/mm_init.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kexec_handover.h b/include/linux/kexec_handover.h
index 40cb95a80981..18ba417f1ada 100644
--- a/include/linux/kexec_handover.h
+++ b/include/linux/kexec_handover.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ void kho_remove_subtree(void *blob);
int kho_retrieve_subtree(const char *name, phys_addr_t *phys, size_t *size);
void kho_memory_init(void);
+void kho_memory_init_early(void);
void kho_populate(phys_addr_t fdt_phys, u64 fdt_len, phys_addr_t scratch_phys,
u64 scratch_len);
@@ -110,6 +111,8 @@ static inline int kho_retrieve_subtree(const char *name, phys_addr_t *phys,
static inline void kho_memory_init(void) { }
+static inline void kho_memory_init_early(void) { }
+
static inline void kho_populate(phys_addr_t fdt_phys, u64 fdt_len,
phys_addr_t scratch_phys, u64 scratch_len)
{
diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
index b3b97a6ff9c8..2ddfc804cdf7 100644
--- a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
+++ b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
@@ -1534,8 +1534,6 @@ static void __init kho_mem_retrieve(void)
const void *fdt = kho_get_fdt();
int err;
- kho_scratch = phys_to_virt(kho_in.scratch_phys);
-
/*
* kho_get_mem_map() should always succeed. If it fails, kho_populate()
* catches that and never sets kho_in.scratch_phys, which stops memory
@@ -1756,6 +1754,19 @@ static __init int kho_init(void)
}
fs_initcall(kho_init);
+void __init kho_memory_init_early(void)
+{
+ if (!is_kho_boot())
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * kho_scratch_overlap() needs kho_scratch to be initialized. It
+ * is used by free_area_init() on KHO boots, so initialize it
+ * early.
+ */
+ kho_scratch = phys_to_virt(kho_in.scratch_phys);
+}
+
void __init kho_memory_init(void)
{
if (kho_in.scratch_phys)
diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
index 0f64909e8d20..84d4b1c997bc 100644
--- a/mm/mm_init.c
+++ b/mm/mm_init.c
@@ -2687,6 +2687,7 @@ void __init __weak mem_init(void)
void __init mm_core_init_early(void)
{
+ kho_memory_init_early();
hugetlb_cma_reserve();
hugetlb_bootmem_alloc();
--
2.55.0.141.g00534a21ce-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 17:37 [PATCH v3 00/21] kho: make boot time huge page allocation work nicely with KHO Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] kho: generalize radix tree APIs Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] kho: make radix max key width more obvious Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] kho: disallow wide keys in radix tree Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] kho: return virtual address of mem_map Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] kho: store incoming radix tree in kho_in Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] kho: move all memory retrieval logic to kho_mem_retrieve() Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] kho: add a struct for radix callbacks Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] kho: add callback for table pages Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] kho: add data argument to radix walk callback Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] kho: allow early-boot usage of the KHO radix tree Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] kho: allow destroying " Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] kho: add kho_radix_init_tree() Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] kho: expose kho_scratch_overlap() to kexec_handover.h Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:38 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-07-09 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] kho: initialize preserved memory map radix tree earlier Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] mm/mm_init: init deferred page migratetype in deferred_init_pages() Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] mm/mm_init: don't rely on memblock to get KHO scratch migratetype Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] kho: extend scratch Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] memblock: make HugeTLB bootmem allocation work with KHO Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] memblock: add memblock_reserved_hugetlb_size() Pratyush Yadav
2026-07-09 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] kho: exclude hugetlb memory from scratch size calculation Pratyush Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709173821.429921-15-pratyush@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jasonmiu@google.com \
--cc=jloeser@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox