The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 17/33] sched_ext: Generalize local-DSQ handling to rq-owned DSQs
Date: Thu,  9 Jul 2026 12:50:25 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709225041.1695495-18-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709225041.1695495-1-tj@kernel.org>

The local DSQ is synchronized by the containing rq lock rather than its own
dsq->lock. A later patch adds a second such DSQ. In preparation, factor the
"rq owns the lock" test into dsq_is_rq_owned() and rename
local_dsq_post_enq() to rq_owned_post_enq(), taking @rq explicitly.

No behavior change.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index 9d111bdd05e9..f58cf7c39b6e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -96,6 +96,17 @@ static atomic_long_t scx_hotplug_seq = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);
 /* Global cursor for the per-CPU tid allocator. Starts at 1; tid 0 is reserved. */
 static atomic64_t scx_tid_cursor = ATOMIC64_INIT(1);
 
+/* is @dsq synchronized by the containing rq lock instead of dsq->lock? */
+static bool dsq_is_rq_owned(struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
+{
+	switch (dsq->id) {
+	case SCX_DSQ_LOCAL:
+		return true;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_EXT_SUB_SCHED
 /*
  * The sub sched being enabled. Used by scx_disable_and_exit_task() to exit
@@ -1270,11 +1281,10 @@ static void call_task_dequeue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
 	p->scx.flags &= ~SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY;
 }
 
-static void local_dsq_post_enq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,
-			       struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags)
+static void rq_owned_post_enq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
+			      struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p,
+			      u64 enq_flags)
 {
-	struct rq *rq = container_of(dsq, struct rq, scx.local_dsq);
-
 	call_task_dequeue(sch, rq, p, 0);
 
 	/*
@@ -1334,13 +1344,13 @@ static void scx_dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
 				 struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p,
 				 u64 enq_flags)
 {
-	bool is_local = dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL;
+	bool is_rq_owned = dsq_is_rq_owned(dsq);
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.dsq || !list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node));
 	WARN_ON_ONCE((p->scx.dsq_flags & SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ) ||
 		     !RB_EMPTY_NODE(&p->scx.dsq_priq));
 
-	if (!is_local) {
+	if (!is_rq_owned) {
 		raw_spin_lock_nested(&dsq->lock,
 			(enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_NESTED) ? SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING : 0);
 
@@ -1435,8 +1445,8 @@ static void scx_dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
 	 * ops_state first, both sides would modify p->scx.flags
 	 * concurrently in a non-atomic way.
 	 */
-	if (is_local) {
-		local_dsq_post_enq(sch, dsq, p, enq_flags);
+	if (is_rq_owned) {
+		rq_owned_post_enq(sch, rq, dsq, p, enq_flags);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Global and bypass DSQs are terminal - the task leaves the
@@ -1487,7 +1497,7 @@ static void task_unlink_from_dsq(struct task_struct *p,
 static void scx_dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq = p->scx.dsq;
-	bool is_local = dsq == &rq->scx.local_dsq;
+	bool is_rq_owned = dsq && dsq_is_rq_owned(dsq);
 
 	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
 
@@ -1511,7 +1521,7 @@ static void scx_dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (!is_local)
+	if (!is_rq_owned)
 		raw_spin_lock(&dsq->lock);
 
 	/*
@@ -1533,7 +1543,7 @@ static void scx_dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 	}
 	p->scx.dsq = NULL;
 
-	if (!is_local)
+	if (!is_rq_owned)
 		raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
 }
 
@@ -2085,7 +2095,7 @@ static void move_local_task_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch,
 	dsq_inc_nr(dst_dsq, p, enq_flags);
 	p->scx.dsq = dst_dsq;
 
-	local_dsq_post_enq(sch, dst_dsq, p, enq_flags);
+	rq_owned_post_enq(sch, dst_rq, dst_dsq, p, enq_flags);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 22:50 [PATCHSET v5 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched_ext: Capability-based CPU delegation for sub-schedulers Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 01/33] sched_ext: Assert per-task ops run on the task's owner Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 02/33] sched_ext: Make the kick machinery per-sched Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 03/33] sched_ext: Add ops.init_cids() to finalize the cid layout before init Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 04/33] sched_ext: Add CID sharding Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 05/33] sched_ext: Add shard boundaries to scx_bpf_cid_override() Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 06/33] sched_ext: Defer scx_sched kobj sysfs add into the enable workfns Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 07/33] sched_ext: Add per-shard scx_sched storage scaffolding Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 08/33] sched_ext: Add scx_cmask_ref for validated arena cmask access Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 09/33] sched_ext: Build the set_cmask scratch from trusted geometry Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 10/33] sched_ext: RCU-protect the sub-sched tree's children/sibling lists Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 11/33] sched_ext: Add scx_skip_subtree_pre() Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 12/33] sched_ext: Stop resolving a disabled scheduler's programs Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 13/33] sched_ext: Add per-shard cap delegation for sub-schedulers Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 14/33] sched_ext: Add coalescing sub_caps_updated() notifier " Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 15/33] sched_ext: Maintain per-cpu effective cap copies for single-read checks Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 16/33] sched_ext: Add sub_ecaps_updated() effective-cap change notifier Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 18/33] sched_ext: Add reject DSQ for cap-rejected dispatches Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 19/33] sched_ext: Add SCX_ENQ_IGNORE_CAPS for in-place restore Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 20/33] sched_ext: Add the SCX_CAP_ENQ_IMMED cap Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 21/33] sched_ext: Assign a unique id to each scheduler instance Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 22/33] sched_ext: Route task slice writes through set_task_slice() Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 23/33] sched_ext: Track the cpu a task is runnable on Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 24/33] sched_ext: Tie cpu occupancy to SCX_CAP_BASE through the task slice Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 25/33] sched_ext: Add the SCX_CAP_ENQ cap Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 26/33] sched_ext: Gate kicks on SCX_CAP_BASE and preemption on SCX_CAP_PREEMPT Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 27/33] sched_ext: Authorize remote-move inserts against the placing scheduler Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 28/33] sched_ext: Route ops.update_idle() to sub-schedulers and re-notify owed scheds Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 29/33] sched_ext: Replay ecaps notifications suppressed by bypass Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 30/33] sched_ext: Add scx_bpf_sub_kill() to evict a child sub-scheduler Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 31/33] tools/sched_ext: Add three-mask cmask intersection iterator Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 32/33] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap - Expand hierarchical sub-scheduling Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 sched_ext/for-7.3 33/33] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap - Add sub-sched cap fault injection Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260709225041.1695495-18-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox