From: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Please consider fb3bbcfe344e ("exit: change the release_task() paths to call flush_sigqueue() lockless") for 5.10.y, 5.15.y, 6.1.y, 6.6.y, and 6.12.y
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 22:31:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710023120.3747693-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com> (raw)
Please consider the following already-mainlined fix for the stable
series listed below.
Upstream commit: fb3bbcfe344e64a46574a638b051ffd78762c12d
Subject: exit: change the release_task() paths to call flush_sigqueue() lockless
This is a stable option-2 request for an already-mainlined fix. The
patch fixes a security-relevant bug pattern that remains present in the
listed stable branches in my current review.
Why this belongs in stable:
__exit_signal() calls flush_sigqueue(&tsk->pending) (and shared_pending)
under siglock with irqs disabled. A local unprivileged task can block an
RT signal, queue signal instances to itself up to its inherited hard
RLIMIT_SIGPENDING, and then exit, making the kernel drain the queue with
interrupts disabled. Raising the hard limit requires CAP_SYS_RESOURCE,
so the highest-impact case depends on a high inherited/system-managed
limit rather than arbitrary unprivileged limit raising.
Requested stable series:
- 5.10.y
- 5.15.y
- 6.1.y
- 6.6.y
- 6.12.y
Fresh stable check (2026-07-08):
- 5.10.y: 738ac465e4e9
fix shape: absent; upstream diff: applies-cleanly
- 5.15.y: c86c4726e7f0
fix shape: absent; upstream diff: applies-cleanly
- 6.1.y: 090666d3cc90
fix shape: absent; upstream diff: applies-cleanly
- 6.6.y: da47cbc25466
fix shape: absent; upstream diff: applies-cleanly
- 6.12.y: 296aabce4594
fix shape: absent; upstream diff: applies-cleanly
- 6.15.y and newer checked branches already have the fixed shape
Backport note:
The mechanical check above reports whether the upstream diff applies to
each listed branch as-is. In this refresh, the upstream diff applies
cleanly to the file snapshots for all requested series.
Impact context:
- current CVSS estimate: 4.7
- vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- direct-tracking exposure: Debian 11/12/13 and Android 13/14/15/16 GKI
- primary touched file: kernel/exit.c
Impact: local availability only. My saved v6.1.173 test at this host's
normal pending-signal hard limit (450505) produced a 1.035s clocksource
long-readout gap. With a high inherited hard limit, a v6.1.173/QEMU run
that queued 6M RT signals hit a softlockup watchdog panic in
release_task() at _raw_write_unlock_irq(); the same 6M target on
v6.1.173 plus fb3bbcfe completed with no lockup signal. The fatal case
therefore remains AC:H because it depends on a high inherited or
system-managed hard limit rather than arbitrary unprivileged limit
raising. I do not have evidence for privilege escalation, code
execution, confidentiality impact, integrity impact, NMI-hardlockup
proof, or a default-limit fatal panic.
No reproducer is included in this public stable request. I can provide
additional details privately if needed.
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 2:31 Michael Bommarito [this message]
2026-07-10 21:03 ` Please consider fb3bbcfe344e ("exit: change the release_task() paths to call flush_sigqueue() lockless") for 5.10.y, 5.15.y, 6.1.y, 6.6.y, and 6.12.y Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710023120.3747693-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
--to=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox