From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
David Dai <david.dai@linux.dev>, Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
Aiqun Yu <aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] sched_ext: Split curr|donor references properly
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:36:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710083913.30573-4-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710083913.30573-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
With proxy execution, the task selected by the scheduler and the task
physically executing can differ. A blocked mutex waiter donates its
scheduling context to the lock owner:
D -----------------> M -------------> O ----------------> T
[donor] blocked on [mutex] owned by [owner] preempted by [task]
\_________________________________^
donates scheduling context
where:
D = blocked donor
M = mutex
O = mutex owner
T = competing runnable task
During a proxy execution switch, D supplies the scheduling class,
priority, and runtime budget, while O supplies the execution context: O
is the task whose code physically executes. T is a competing runnable
task which may preempt the D/O proxy execution.
Consider FAIR and EXT tasks with sched_ext running in partial mode. FAIR
can be replaced with a higher scheduling class such as RT or deadline
without changing the class interaction described here. The possible
combinations are:
1. D is EXT, O is EXT, T is EXT
D can interrupt T according to BPF scheduling policy. O executes
with D's EXT priority and runtime budget, while T waits in EXT.
2. D is EXT, O is EXT, T is FAIR
D is visible to the BPF scheduler, but cannot preempt T because
EXT is below FAIR. Once T stops, BPF can dispatch D and O executes
with D's EXT priority and runtime budget. If T becomes runnable
again, it preempts the D/O proxy execution.
3. D is EXT, O is FAIR, T is EXT
This cannot represent T preempting O because EXT is below FAIR.
4. D is EXT, O is FAIR, T is FAIR
D cannot boost O above T because EXT is below FAIR. O and T
continue competing under FAIR. Once O releases M, D wakes and
resumes normal EXT scheduling.
5. D is FAIR, O is EXT, T is EXT
D preempts T as the higher-class scheduling context. O executes
with D's FAIR priority and runtime budget, while T waits in EXT.
D is not visible to the BPF scheduler.
6. D is FAIR, O is EXT, T is FAIR
D competes with T according to its FAIR deadline. When D is
selected, O executes with D's FAIR priority and runtime budget.
D is not visible to the BPF scheduler.
7. D is FAIR, O is FAIR, T is EXT
This cannot represent T preempting O because EXT is below FAIR.
8. D is FAIR, O is FAIR, T is FAIR
O, T, and D all have FAIR scheduling contexts. D remains runnable
as a blocked proxy donor. When CFS selects D, O executes using D's
FAIR scheduling context. When CFS selects O, O executes using its
own FAIR context, and when CFS selects T, T executes normally. D
is not visible to the BPF scheduler.
Thus, sched_ext policy and accounting must generally use rq->donor, the
scheduler-selected task which supplies the scheduling context, rather
than rq->curr, the task whose code physically executes. Without proxy
execution they are the same task.
On nohz_full CPUs, a blocked proxy donor must retain the scheduler tick
even when it has an infinite slice. Otherwise, a full dynticks CPU could
stop the tick while rq->curr and rq->donor differ, violating assumptions
made by the remote NOHZ tick path.
This is a conservative compromise that keeps the change local to
sched_ext, at the cost of a periodic tick while a blocked proxy donor is
selected. Allowing blocked proxy donors to run tickless would require
making the core scheduler's remote tick handling aware that rq->curr and
rq->donor can differ.
Moreover, extend scx_dump_state() to report both contexts. Each CPU
record now includes a donor= line. If an EXT donor differs from
rq->curr, also emit its detailed task record. The existing '*' marker
continues to identify rq->curr, while the donor= line identifies the
otherwise unmarked donor record.
Note that at this point in the series, CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC still
depends on !CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT, so proxy execution and sched_ext
cannot be enabled together. The scheduling changes are therefore
preparatory. A later patch removes this restriction.
Co-developed-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index 6b7efb19d2843..1946824f3b8a9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -1149,17 +1149,24 @@ static void touch_core_sched_dispatch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
static void update_curr_scx(struct rq *rq)
{
- struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
+ struct task_struct *donor;
s64 delta_exec;
+ /*
+ * update_curr_scx() is selected through rq->donor->sched_class, not
+ * rq->curr->sched_class, so @donor is always an EXT task here. If an EXT
+ * owner executes for a FAIR donor, FAIR's update_curr() runs instead.
+ */
+ donor = rq->donor;
+
delta_exec = update_curr_common(rq);
if (unlikely(delta_exec <= 0))
return;
- if (curr->scx.slice != SCX_SLICE_INF) {
- curr->scx.slice -= min_t(u64, curr->scx.slice, delta_exec);
- if (!curr->scx.slice)
- touch_core_sched(rq, curr);
+ if (donor->scx.slice != SCX_SLICE_INF) {
+ donor->scx.slice -= min_t(u64, donor->scx.slice, delta_exec);
+ if (!donor->scx.slice)
+ touch_core_sched(rq, donor);
}
dl_server_update(&rq->ext_server, delta_exec);
@@ -1320,9 +1327,9 @@ static void local_dsq_post_enq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq
if (rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_IN_BALANCE)
return;
- if ((enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_PREEMPT) && p != rq->curr &&
- rq->curr->sched_class == &ext_sched_class) {
- rq->curr->scx.slice = 0;
+ if ((enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_PREEMPT) && p != rq->donor &&
+ rq->donor->sched_class == &ext_sched_class) {
+ rq->donor->scx.slice = 0;
resched_curr(rq);
}
}
@@ -2470,7 +2477,8 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
}
/* if the destination CPU is idle, wake it up */
- if (!fallback && sched_class_above(p->sched_class, dst_rq->curr->sched_class))
+ if (!fallback && sched_class_above(p->sched_class,
+ dst_rq->donor->sched_class))
resched_curr(dst_rq);
}
@@ -2678,6 +2686,7 @@ static int balance_one(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
{
struct scx_sched *sch = scx_task_sched(p);
+ bool can_stop_tick;
if (p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_QUEUED) {
/*
@@ -2703,6 +2712,7 @@ static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
}
clr_task_runnable(p, true);
+ can_stop_tick = p->scx.slice == SCX_SLICE_INF && !task_is_blocked(p);
/*
* @p is getting newly scheduled or got kicked after someone updated its
@@ -2713,7 +2723,7 @@ static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
* nohz. In the future, we might want to add a mechanism to update
* load_avgs periodically on tick-stopped CPUs.
*/
- if (p->scx.slice == SCX_SLICE_INF) {
+ if (can_stop_tick) {
if (!(rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_CAN_STOP_TICK)) {
/*
* Bypass mode always assigns finite slices, so @p
@@ -2734,7 +2744,8 @@ static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
/*
* @rq still references the outgoing scheduling context. A finite
- * slice is sufficient by itself to require the tick.
+ * slice or a blocked proxy donor is sufficient by itself to require
+ * the tick.
*/
if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu_of(rq)))
tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(cpu_of(rq), TICK_DEP_BIT_SCHED);
@@ -2907,7 +2918,7 @@ static struct task_struct *first_local_task(struct rq *rq)
static struct task_struct *
do_pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf, bool force_scx)
{
- struct task_struct *prev = rq->curr;
+ struct task_struct *prev = rq->donor;
bool keep_prev;
struct task_struct *p;
@@ -4060,14 +4071,14 @@ static void run_deferred(struct rq *rq)
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
bool scx_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
{
- struct task_struct *p = rq->curr;
+ struct task_struct *p = rq->donor;
struct scx_sched *sch = scx_task_sched(p);
if (p->sched_class != &ext_sched_class)
return true;
/*
- * @rq->curr may still reference an outgoing EXT task after it has been
+ * @rq->donor may still reference an outgoing EXT task after it has been
* dequeued. If no EXT tasks are accounted on @rq, ignore its stale
* slice state. If another task is dispatched from a DSQ,
* set_next_task_scx() will update the dependency for the incoming task.
@@ -4081,7 +4092,8 @@ bool scx_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
/*
* @rq can dispatch from different DSQs, so we can't tell whether it
* needs the tick or not by looking at nr_running. Allow stopping ticks
- * iff the BPF scheduler indicated so. See set_next_task_scx().
+ * iff set_next_task_scx() determined that the selected scheduling context
+ * can run tickless.
*/
return rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_CAN_STOP_TICK;
}
@@ -6047,6 +6059,9 @@ static void scx_dump_cpu(struct scx_sched *sch, struct seq_buf *s,
dump_line(&ns, " curr=%s[%d] class=%ps",
rq->curr->comm, rq->curr->pid,
rq->curr->sched_class);
+ dump_line(&ns, " donor=%s[%d] class=%ps",
+ rq->donor->comm, rq->donor->pid,
+ rq->donor->sched_class);
if (!cpumask_empty(rq->scx.cpus_to_kick))
dump_line(&ns, " cpus_to_kick : %*pb",
cpumask_pr_args(rq->scx.cpus_to_kick));
@@ -6090,6 +6105,10 @@ static void scx_dump_cpu(struct scx_sched *sch, struct seq_buf *s,
if (rq->curr->sched_class == &ext_sched_class &&
(dump_all_tasks || scx_task_on_sched(sch, rq->curr)))
scx_dump_task(sch, s, dctx, rq, rq->curr, '*');
+ if (rq->donor != rq->curr &&
+ rq->donor->sched_class == &ext_sched_class &&
+ (dump_all_tasks || scx_task_on_sched(sch, rq->donor)))
+ scx_dump_task(sch, s, dctx, rq, rq->donor, ' ');
list_for_each_entry(p, &rq->scx.runnable_list, scx.runnable_node)
if (dump_all_tasks || scx_task_on_sched(sch, p))
@@ -7518,7 +7537,7 @@ static bool kick_one_cpu(s32 cpu, struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long *ksyncs)
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave(rq, flags);
- cur_class = rq->curr->sched_class;
+ cur_class = rq->donor->sched_class;
/*
* During CPU hotplug, a CPU may depend on kicking itself to make
@@ -7530,7 +7549,7 @@ static bool kick_one_cpu(s32 cpu, struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long *ksyncs)
!sched_class_above(cur_class, &ext_sched_class)) {
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_preempt)) {
if (cur_class == &ext_sched_class)
- rq->curr->scx.slice = 0;
+ rq->donor->scx.slice = 0;
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, this_scx->cpus_to_preempt);
}
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 8:36 [PATCHSET v4 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched: Make proxy execution compatible with sched_ext Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 8:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] sched/core: Drop mutex locks before proxy rescheduling Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 18:56 ` John Stultz
2026-07-10 20:47 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-11 0:21 ` John Stultz
2026-07-11 9:04 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 8:36 ` [PATCH 02/10] sched_ext: Fix ops.running/stopping() pairing for proxy-exec donors Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 21:33 ` John Stultz
2026-07-11 9:37 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 8:36 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-07-10 8:36 ` [PATCH 04/10] sched_ext: Fix TOCTOU race in consume_remote_task() Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 8:36 ` [PATCH 05/10] sched_ext: Handle blocked donor migration with proxy execution Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 8:36 ` [PATCH 06/10] sched_ext: Delegate proxy donor admission to BPF schedulers Andrea Righi
2026-07-11 1:43 ` John Stultz
2026-07-11 8:24 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 8:36 ` [PATCH 07/10] sched_ext: Add proxy destination query kfuncs Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 21:54 ` John Stultz
2026-07-11 9:07 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 8:36 ` [PATCH 08/10] sched_ext: Add selftest for blocked donor admission Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 8:36 ` [PATCH 09/10] sched_ext: scx_qmap: Add proxy execution support Andrea Righi
2026-07-10 8:36 ` [PATCH 10/10] sched: Allow enabling proxy exec with sched_ext Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710083913.30573-4-arighi@nvidia.com \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=david.dai@linux.dev \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox