From: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
To: Mert Seftali <mertsftl@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Jelle van der Waa" <jelle@vdwaa.nl>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: dmard09: Implement IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:51:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710105109.000047c5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710083623.84243-1-mertsftl@gmail.com>
On Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:36:23 +0200
Mert Seftali <mertsftl@gmail.com> wrote:
> Reading the in_accel_scale attribute on the DMARD09 has always returned
> -EINVAL: the channels advertise scale via info_mask_shared_by_type so the
> IIO core exposes the attribute, but dmard09_read_raw() only handles
> IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW, so a SCALE read falls through to 'default: return
> -EINVAL':
>
> $ cat .../iio:deviceX/in_accel_scale
> cat: in_accel_scale: Invalid argument
>
> leaving userspace with raw counts it cannot convert to m/s^2.
>
> The driver was written from a vendor source [1] without a datasheet, and
> the scale was declared but never implemented. The vendor source carries
> the sensitivity: its conversion is
>
> acc = raw * GRAVITY_EARTH_1000 / sensitivity (then / 1000 -> m/s^2)
>
> with sensitivity = 32 and GRAVITY_EARTH_1000 = 9807 ("about
> (9.80665)*1000"), i.e. 32 counts correspond to 1 g.
>
> That sensitivity applies to the value this driver already reports as raw:
> the vendor reduces each 16-bit sample to a signed 9-bit value, and the
> preparation in dmard09_read_raw() yields the same value. It is
> self-consistent: 256 counts / 32 = 8 g full scale, matching the +/-8g
> range.
>
> Implement the scale derived from that sensitivity using standard gravity:
>
> scale = 9.80665 / 32 = 0.3064578125 m/s^2 per LSB
>
> Link: https://github.com/minstrelsy/mediatek/blob/1f49d8c87b839651bc89afc870277e8e0f2e2d55/custom/common/kernel/accelerometer/dmard09/dmard09.c [1]
> Fixes: a4fa6509dda4 ("iio: accel: add support for the Domintech DMARD09 3-axis accelerometer")
> Signed-off-by: Mert Seftali <mertsftl@gmail.com>
> ---
Good thing that Jelle sent the vendor driver, LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
--
Kind regards
CJD
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 8:36 [PATCH v2] iio: accel: dmard09: Implement IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE Mert Seftali
2026-07-10 8:51 ` Joshua Crofts [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710105109.000047c5@gmail.com \
--to=joshua.crofts1@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jelle@vdwaa.nl \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mertsftl@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox