From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v2 08/16] rxrpc: Fix generation of notifications after call completion
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 20:22:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710192220.1922433-9-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710192220.1922433-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
AF_RXRPC may generate a notification to the application after a call has
completed because it generates one notification when
rxrpc_input_split_jumbo() queues the final packet and completes the call
and then generates another when rxrpc_input_split_jumbo() does the
aggregated data receive notification at the end of the function.
This might cause the AFS filesystem to malfunction because it tries to
queue the afs_call for processing an extra time. Most of the time this
happens quickly enough that the second queue_work skips, but sometimes this
means that the call work may happen a second time with implications for
afs_call lifetime management.
Fix this by:
(1) Create a lighter version of rxrpc_notify_socket() that's just used to
requeue a call for rxrpc_recvmsg() without creating another
notification.
(2) Move rxrpc_notify_socket() to call_state.c and rename it to
__rxrpc_notify_socket().
(3) Create a wrapper called rxrpc_notify_socket() that skips the
notification if a call is completed.
(4) Make rxrpc_set_call_completion() call __rxrpc_notify_socket() to avoid
the skip-if-completed check.
Fixes: 2d1faf7a0ca3 ("rxrpc: Simplify skbuff accounting in receive path")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: stable@kernel.org
---
include/trace/events/rxrpc.h | 1 +
net/rxrpc/call_state.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c | 42 +++++++++-----------------
3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
index 8f3e3967885a..d7c7b04d69fc 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
@@ -343,6 +343,7 @@
EM(rxrpc_call_see_distribute_error, "SEE dist-err") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_input, "SEE input ") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_notify_released, "SEE nfy-rlsd") \
+ EM(rxrpc_call_see_notify_skipped, "SEE nfy-skip") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_recvmsg, "SEE recvmsg ") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_recvmsg_requeue, "SEE recv-rqu") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_recvmsg_requeue_first, "SEE recv-rqF") \
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_state.c b/net/rxrpc/call_state.c
index 6afb54373ebb..6e402312e145 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_state.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_state.c
@@ -7,6 +7,61 @@
#include "ar-internal.h"
+/*
+ * Post a call for attention by the socket or kernel service. Further
+ * notifications are suppressed by putting recvmsg_link on a dummy queue.
+ */
+static void __rxrpc_notify_socket(struct rxrpc_call *call)
+{
+ struct rxrpc_sock *rx;
+ struct sock *sk;
+
+ if (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_RELEASED, &call->flags)) {
+ rxrpc_see_call(call, rxrpc_call_see_notify_released);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ rx = rcu_dereference(call->socket);
+ sk = &rx->sk;
+ if (rx && sk->sk_state < RXRPC_CLOSE) {
+ if (call->notify_rx) {
+ spin_lock_irq(&call->notify_lock);
+ call->notify_rx(sk, call, call->user_call_ID);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&call->notify_lock);
+ } else {
+ spin_lock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&call->recvmsg_link)) {
+ rxrpc_get_call(call, rxrpc_call_get_notify_socket);
+ list_add_tail(&call->recvmsg_link, &rx->recvmsg_q);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
+
+ if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
+ _debug("call %ps", sk->sk_data_ready);
+ sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Post a call for attention by the socket or kernel service. Further
+ * notifications are suppressed by putting recvmsg_link on a dummy queue.
+ */
+void rxrpc_notify_socket(struct rxrpc_call *call)
+{
+ if (rxrpc_call_is_complete(call)) {
+ rxrpc_see_call(call, rxrpc_call_see_notify_skipped);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ __rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
+}
+
/*
* Transition a call to the complete state.
*/
@@ -25,7 +80,7 @@ bool rxrpc_set_call_completion(struct rxrpc_call *call,
rxrpc_set_call_state(call, RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE);
trace_rxrpc_call_complete(call);
wake_up(&call->waitq);
- rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
+ __rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
return true;
}
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
index efcba4b2e74f..28b2148b5693 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
@@ -17,13 +17,12 @@
#include "ar-internal.h"
/*
- * Post a call for attention by the socket or kernel service. Further
- * notifications are suppressed by putting recvmsg_link on a dummy queue.
+ * Requeue a call for recvmsg() to pick up.
*/
-void rxrpc_notify_socket(struct rxrpc_call *call)
+static void rxrpc_requeue_call(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call)
{
- struct rxrpc_sock *rx;
- struct sock *sk;
+ struct rxrpc_sock *rx = rxrpc_sk(sock->sk);
+ struct sock *sk = &rx->sk;
_enter("%d", call->debug_id);
@@ -32,31 +31,18 @@ void rxrpc_notify_socket(struct rxrpc_call *call)
return;
}
- rcu_read_lock();
-
- rx = rcu_dereference(call->socket);
- sk = &rx->sk;
- if (rx && sk->sk_state < RXRPC_CLOSE) {
- if (call->notify_rx) {
- spin_lock_irq(&call->notify_lock);
- call->notify_rx(sk, call, call->user_call_ID);
- spin_unlock_irq(&call->notify_lock);
- } else {
- spin_lock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
- if (list_empty(&call->recvmsg_link)) {
- rxrpc_get_call(call, rxrpc_call_get_notify_socket);
- list_add_tail(&call->recvmsg_link, &rx->recvmsg_q);
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&call->recvmsg_link)) {
+ rxrpc_get_call(call, rxrpc_call_get_notify_socket);
+ list_add_tail(&call->recvmsg_link, &rx->recvmsg_q);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
- _debug("call %ps", sk->sk_data_ready);
- sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
- }
- }
+ if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
+ _debug("call %ps", sk->sk_data_ready);
+ sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
_leave("");
}
@@ -561,7 +547,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK) &&
!skb_queue_empty(&call->recvmsg_queue))
- rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
+ rxrpc_requeue_call(sock, call);
goto not_yet_complete;
call_failed:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 19:22 [PATCH net v2 00/16] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet handling David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 01/16] afs: Fix NULL deref in afs_deliver_cb_init_call_back_state3() David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 02/16] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg to not return an error if last packet queued David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 03/16] afs: Fix UAF when sending a message David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 04/16] afs: Fix two delivery functions to pass back -EAGAIN David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 05/16] afs: Fix afs_fs_fetch_data() to set call->async David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 06/16] rxrpc: Fix packet encryption error handling David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 07/16] rxrpc: Fix update of call->tx_pending without holding lock David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` David Howells [this message]
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 09/16] afs: Simplify call refcounting David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 10/16] afs: Make afs_put_call() take trace argument David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 11/16] afs: Fix UAF in afs_make_call() David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 12/16] keys: Add refcounting to user-defined key type payload David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 13/16] afs: Create a server appdata key David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 14/16] rxrpc: Pass appdata key to rxrpc_call and thence to rxrpc_bundle David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 15/16] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet overqueuing and simplify RESPONSE generation David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 16/16] rxrpc: Remove OOB challenge/response code David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710192220.1922433-9-dhowells@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox