From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E05A3C09E5; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 21:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783719443; cv=none; b=XMn3nu65o64svvRk+pLtE30otAE2TFnXpP8mVW5lr4Jp5R9949HfA/xGmiX5uTVUehv0V+8vV0vb2ghyAOi74IprXL084wdPnVYHUV91SE/y0l5Xq/zQV+LKqrxZbohVYxpxjGh8gLX00swiMWPqsYILqcuU6L1UbDyebtAq30s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783719443; c=relaxed/simple; bh=g/65r6Zl52c5Lu5VFDjKq6YGs4gibIkRjG+Oyw7OUpQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ei3eWu0WrcVZKA0B/5GHt/ARBmNZnH5oFJsCBrpEChXuRaJdCeyXJHOafttrKMz6dNZGLhTPwtOvaeINoto5379NYQDUqStgEOOOeLlKJgv2Lb94r/h+WKCfCgfc8nnDZMvvDjhwgqZ0nqZhB09WtD+O5sD+8YcHhHwMDtA8aSg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ErpNrKah; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ErpNrKah" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6A2B1F000E9; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 21:37:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783719440; bh=tXJO98NiV+M3ZHWe40hcWvLZj3tsp+2pn41neMfQsfY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ErpNrKahZ2ftDZLRZIu4IDyBtV5Oa4EZZouVUX8R0l3oxfIiN/p8BF3dt+aF6fFmt vtptJcEsXS7Mh7Z/ayECbrfw6Sm2WQEFsm4vyoe/Kd1qO7yDGt4I9mhMF05zKMW9jj pB4g1kzpSojSK0LA7wr/syPjK0gsV1e6tgsCDXUjOcWffLBY4+8Uy5XXJ8D9UHaiy1 r/9pJC5PzLNh3zQZmO06AS6gz8OU8k9LnTDGg6ZhZhRPsSqo/GnhzrRROcODxFtC5t 2BLK8Abx4peWScIaa2YYv3VSpY5IDj538q7NwnAAqoaFkUQp5YpgBZArUIcwGTc80C xuVen6Y/aotAw== Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 17:37:18 -0400 From: Eric Biggers To: "David C.C.M. Gall" Cc: Lukas Wunner , Ignat Korchagin , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: rsassa-pkcs1: use constant-time comparison for digest and signature verification Message-ID: <20260710213718.GD1911@quark> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 07:29:33PM +0200, David C.C.M. Gall wrote: > Replace memcmp() with crypto_memneq() for cryptographic digest and > signature comparisons to prevent timing side-channel attacks. > > crypto/rsassa-pkcs1.c: RSA signature digest verification used memcmp > which can leak valid prefix length via timing analysis, user data > could reach the leaky comparison via the digest argument to verify. > > Assisted-by: gregkh_clanker_t1000 > Signed-off-by: David C.C.M. Gall While we should use crypto_memneq() on MACs, auth tags, and other secret data, I don't think we should let it creep into domains where it is clearly not needed, like public key signature verification. - Eric