From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: bestswngs@gmail.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
jmaloy@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au, xmei5@asu.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] tipc: fix NULL deref in tipc_named_node_up() on empty publication list
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:46:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260713134610.1779498-1-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706163024.1205930-2-bestswngs@gmail.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
Full review at: https://sashiko.dev
---
tipc: fix NULL deref in tipc_named_node_up() on empty publication list
This commit fixes a NULL pointer dereference in tipc_named_node_up() that
occurs when the cluster_scope publication list is empty. The fix introduces
an early return to avoid calling named_distribute() with an empty list.
> diff --git a/net/tipc/name_distr.c b/net/tipc/name_distr.c
> index ba4f4906e13b7..60ccaa862162c 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/name_distr.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/name_distr.c
> @@ -218,6 +218,10 @@ void tipc_named_node_up(struct net *net, u32 dnode, u16 capabilities)
> spin_unlock_bh(&tn->nametbl_lock);
>
> read_lock_bh(&nt->cluster_scope_lock);
> + if (list_empty(&nt->cluster_scope)) {
> + read_unlock_bh(&nt->cluster_scope_lock);
> + return;
> + }
[Severity: Critical]
Does this early return prevent the transmission of the last_bulk
synchronization message to the peer node?
In tipc_named_dequeue(), the peer node sets *open = true only when receiving
a message where msg_is_last_bulk(hdr) is true:
net/tipc/name_distr.c:tipc_named_dequeue() {
...
if (*open && (*rcv_nxt == seqno)) {
(*rcv_nxt)++;
__skb_unlink(skb, namedq);
...
return skb;
}
...
}
If *open is false, all subsequent non-bulk name publications will fail this
sequence check and remain in the namedq indefinitely.
Without sending the last_bulk message, could this cause a permanent stall
of name table updates and an unbounded memory leak of socket buffers on the
peer node?
> named_distribute(net, &head, dnode, &nt->cluster_scope, seqno);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but looking at named_distribute()
called here, what happens if buffer allocation fails during the loop?
Inside named_distribute():
net/tipc/name_distr.c:named_distribute() {
...
if (!skb) {
skb = named_prepare_buf(net, PUBLICATION, msg_rem, dnode);
if (!skb) {
pr_warn("Bulk publication failure\n");
return;
}
...
}
If the function returns early due to allocation failure, the messages
already added to the queue are transmitted by tipc_node_xmit(), but none
of them will have the last_bulk flag set since that happens at the very end
of the function.
Could this also prevent the receiving node from transitioning its named_open
state to true, leading to the exact same permanent stall and memory leak of
subsequent normal name publications?
> tipc_node_xmit(net, &head, dnode, 0);
> read_unlock_bh(&nt->cluster_scope_lock);
--
pw-bot: changes-requested
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 16:30 [PATCH net v2] tipc: fix NULL deref in tipc_named_node_up() on empty publication list Weiming Shi
2026-07-13 13:35 ` Simon Horman
2026-07-13 13:46 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260713134610.1779498-1-horms@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox