The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	David Dai <david.dai@linux.dev>, Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
	Aiqun Yu <aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] sched_ext: Split curr|donor references properly
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 22:54:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715205622.276220-7-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715205622.276220-1-arighi@nvidia.com>

With proxy execution, the task selected by the scheduler and the task
physically executing can differ. A blocked mutex waiter donates its
scheduling context to the lock owner:

  D -----------------> M -------------> O ----------------> T
  [donor] blocked on [mutex] owned by [owner] preempted by [task]
     \_________________________________^
          donates scheduling context

where:

  D = blocked donor
  M = mutex
  O = mutex owner
  T = competing runnable task

During a proxy execution switch, D supplies the scheduling class,
priority, and runtime budget, while O supplies the execution context: O
is the task whose code physically executes. T is a competing runnable
task which may preempt the D/O proxy execution.

Consider FAIR and EXT tasks with sched_ext running in partial mode. FAIR
can be replaced with a higher scheduling class such as RT or deadline
without changing the class interaction described here. The possible
combinations are:

  1. D is EXT, O is EXT, T is EXT

     D can interrupt T according to BPF scheduling policy. O executes
     with D's EXT priority and runtime budget, while T waits in EXT.

  2. D is EXT, O is EXT, T is FAIR

     D is visible to the BPF scheduler, but cannot preempt T because
     EXT is below FAIR. Once T stops, BPF can dispatch D and O executes
     with D's EXT priority and runtime budget. If T becomes runnable
     again, it preempts the D/O proxy execution.

  3. D is EXT, O is FAIR, T is EXT

     This cannot represent T preempting O because EXT is below FAIR.

  4. D is EXT, O is FAIR, T is FAIR

     D cannot boost O above T because EXT is below FAIR. O and T
     continue competing under FAIR. Once O releases M, D wakes and
     resumes normal EXT scheduling.

  5. D is FAIR, O is EXT, T is EXT

     D preempts T as the higher-class scheduling context. O executes
     with D's FAIR priority and runtime budget, while T waits in EXT.
     D is not visible to the BPF scheduler.

  6. D is FAIR, O is EXT, T is FAIR

     D competes with T according to its FAIR deadline. When D is
     selected, O executes with D's FAIR priority and runtime budget.
     D is not visible to the BPF scheduler.

  7. D is FAIR, O is FAIR, T is EXT

     This cannot represent T preempting O because EXT is below FAIR.

  8. D is FAIR, O is FAIR, T is FAIR

     O, T, and D all have FAIR scheduling contexts. D remains runnable
     as a blocked proxy donor. When CFS selects D, O executes using D's
     FAIR scheduling context. When CFS selects O, O executes using its
     own FAIR context, and when CFS selects T, T executes normally. D
     is not visible to the BPF scheduler.

Thus, sched_ext policy and accounting must generally use rq->donor, the
scheduler-selected task which supplies the scheduling context, rather
than rq->curr, the task whose code physically executes. Without proxy
execution they are the same task.

On nohz_full CPUs, a blocked proxy donor must retain the scheduler tick
even when it has an infinite slice. Otherwise, a full dynticks CPU could
stop the tick while rq->curr and rq->donor differ, violating assumptions
made by the remote NOHZ tick path.

This is a conservative compromise that keeps the change local to
sched_ext, at the cost of a periodic tick while a blocked proxy donor is
selected. Allowing blocked proxy donors to run tickless would require
making the core scheduler's remote tick handling aware that rq->curr and
rq->donor can differ.

Moreover, extend scx_dump_state() to report both contexts. Each CPU
record now includes a donor= line. If an EXT donor differs from
rq->curr, also emit its detailed task record. The existing '*' marker
continues to identify rq->curr, while the donor= line identifies the
otherwise unmarked donor record.

Note that at this point in the series, CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC still
depends on !CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT, so proxy execution and sched_ext
cannot be enabled together. The scheduling changes are therefore
preparatory. A later patch removes this restriction.

Co-developed-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
 kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index ca400f765cb7f..6f6884833f8dd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -1332,20 +1332,27 @@ static void apply_task_slice_oob(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 
 static void update_curr_scx(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
+	struct task_struct *donor;
 	s64 delta_exec;
 
+	/*
+	 * update_curr_scx() is selected through rq->donor->sched_class, not
+	 * rq->curr->sched_class, so @donor is always an EXT task here. If an EXT
+	 * owner executes for a FAIR donor, FAIR's update_curr() runs instead.
+	 */
+	donor = rq->donor;
+
 	/* apply even on 0 delta_exec, callers may still act on the slice */
-	apply_task_slice_oob(rq, curr);
+	apply_task_slice_oob(rq, donor);
 
 	delta_exec = update_curr_common(rq);
 	if (unlikely(delta_exec <= 0))
 		return;
 
-	if (curr->scx.slice != SCX_SLICE_INF) {
-		curr->scx.slice -= min_t(u64, curr->scx.slice, delta_exec);
-		if (!curr->scx.slice)
-			touch_core_sched(rq, curr);
+	if (donor->scx.slice != SCX_SLICE_INF) {
+		donor->scx.slice -= min_t(u64, donor->scx.slice, delta_exec);
+		if (!donor->scx.slice)
+			touch_core_sched(rq, donor);
 	}
 
 	dl_server_update(&rq->ext_server, delta_exec);
@@ -1515,9 +1522,9 @@ static void rq_owned_post_enq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
 	if (rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_IN_BALANCE)
 		return;
 
-	if ((enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_PREEMPT) && p != rq->curr &&
-	    rq->curr->sched_class == &ext_sched_class) {
-		set_task_slice(rq->curr, 0);
+	if ((enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_PREEMPT) && p != rq->donor &&
+	    rq->donor->sched_class == &ext_sched_class) {
+		set_task_slice(rq->donor, 0);
 		resched_curr(rq);
 	}
 }
@@ -2720,7 +2727,8 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
 		}
 
 		/* if the destination CPU is idle, wake it up */
-		if (!fallback && sched_class_above(p->sched_class, dst_rq->curr->sched_class))
+		if (!fallback && sched_class_above(p->sched_class,
+						      dst_rq->donor->sched_class))
 			resched_curr(dst_rq);
 	}
 
@@ -2931,6 +2939,7 @@ static int balance_one(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
 {
 	struct scx_sched *sch = scx_task_sched(p);
+	bool can_stop_tick;
 
 	if (p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_QUEUED) {
 		/*
@@ -2959,6 +2968,7 @@ static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
 
 	/* apply any pending out-of-band slice request before the tick decision */
 	apply_task_slice_oob(rq, p);
+	can_stop_tick = p->scx.slice == SCX_SLICE_INF && !p->is_blocked;
 
 	/*
 	 * @p is getting newly scheduled or got kicked after someone updated its
@@ -2969,7 +2979,7 @@ static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
 	 * nohz. In the future, we might want to add a mechanism to update
 	 * load_avgs periodically on tick-stopped CPUs.
 	 */
-	if (p->scx.slice == SCX_SLICE_INF) {
+	if (can_stop_tick) {
 		if (!(rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_CAN_STOP_TICK)) {
 			/*
 			 * Bypass mode always assigns finite slices, so @p
@@ -2990,7 +3000,8 @@ static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
 
 		/*
 		 * @rq still references the outgoing scheduling context. A finite
-		 * slice is sufficient by itself to require the tick.
+		 * slice or a blocked proxy donor is sufficient by itself to require
+		 * the tick.
 		 */
 		if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu_of(rq)))
 			tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(cpu_of(rq), TICK_DEP_BIT_SCHED);
@@ -3165,7 +3176,7 @@ static struct task_struct *first_local_task(struct rq *rq)
 static struct task_struct *
 do_pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf, bool force_scx)
 {
-	struct task_struct *prev = rq->curr;
+	struct task_struct *prev = rq->donor;
 	bool keep_prev;
 	struct task_struct *p;
 
@@ -3525,9 +3536,9 @@ void scx_tick(struct rq *rq)
 	update_other_load_avgs(rq);
 }
 
-static void task_tick_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int queued)
+static void task_tick_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor, int queued)
 {
-	struct scx_sched *sch = scx_task_sched(curr);
+	struct scx_sched *sch = scx_task_sched(donor);
 
 	update_curr_scx(rq);
 
@@ -3536,13 +3547,13 @@ static void task_tick_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int queued)
 	 * we can't trust the slice management or ops.core_sched_before().
 	 */
 	if (scx_bypassing(sch, cpu_of(rq))) {
-		set_task_slice(curr, 0);
-		touch_core_sched(rq, curr);
+		set_task_slice(donor, 0);
+		touch_core_sched(rq, donor);
 	} else if (SCX_HAS_OP(sch, tick)) {
-		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(sch, tick, rq, curr);
+		SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(sch, tick, rq, donor);
 	}
 
-	if (!curr->scx.slice)
+	if (!donor->scx.slice)
 		resched_curr(rq);
 }
 
@@ -4348,14 +4359,14 @@ static void run_deferred(struct rq *rq)
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
 bool scx_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	struct task_struct *p = rq->curr;
+	struct task_struct *p = rq->donor;
 	struct scx_sched *sch = scx_task_sched(p);
 
 	if (p->sched_class != &ext_sched_class)
 		return true;
 
 	/*
-	 * @rq->curr may still reference an outgoing EXT task after it has been
+	 * @rq->donor may still reference an outgoing EXT task after it has been
 	 * dequeued. If no EXT tasks are accounted on @rq, ignore its stale
 	 * slice state. If another task is dispatched from a DSQ,
 	 * set_next_task_scx() will update the dependency for the incoming task.
@@ -4369,7 +4380,8 @@ bool scx_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
 	/*
 	 * @rq can dispatch from different DSQs, so we can't tell whether it
 	 * needs the tick or not by looking at nr_running. Allow stopping ticks
-	 * iff the BPF scheduler indicated so. See set_next_task_scx().
+	 * iff set_next_task_scx() determined that the selected scheduling context
+	 * can run tickless.
 	 */
 	return rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_CAN_STOP_TICK;
 }
@@ -6464,6 +6476,9 @@ static void scx_dump_cpu(struct scx_sched *sch, struct seq_buf *s,
 	dump_line(&ns, "          curr=%s[%d] class=%ps",
 		  rq->curr->comm, rq->curr->pid,
 		  rq->curr->sched_class);
+	dump_line(&ns, "          donor=%s[%d] class=%ps",
+		  rq->donor->comm, rq->donor->pid,
+		  rq->donor->sched_class);
 	if (!cpumask_empty(pcpu->cpus_to_kick))
 		dump_line(&ns, "  cpus_to_kick   : %*pb",
 			  cpumask_pr_args(pcpu->cpus_to_kick));
@@ -6507,6 +6522,10 @@ static void scx_dump_cpu(struct scx_sched *sch, struct seq_buf *s,
 	if (rq->curr->sched_class == &ext_sched_class &&
 	    (dump_all_tasks || scx_task_on_sched(sch, rq->curr)))
 		scx_dump_task(sch, s, dctx, rq, rq->curr, '*');
+	if (rq->donor != rq->curr &&
+	    rq->donor->sched_class == &ext_sched_class &&
+	    (dump_all_tasks || scx_task_on_sched(sch, rq->donor)))
+		scx_dump_task(sch, s, dctx, rq, rq->donor, ' ');
 
 	list_for_each_entry(p, &rq->scx.runnable_list, scx.runnable_node)
 		if (dump_all_tasks || scx_task_on_sched(sch, p))
@@ -8019,7 +8038,7 @@ static bool kick_one_cpu(s32 cpu, struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu, struct rq *this_r
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave(rq, flags);
-	cur_class = rq->curr->sched_class;
+	cur_class = rq->donor->sched_class;
 
 	/*
 	 * During CPU hotplug, a CPU may depend on kicking itself to make
@@ -8036,7 +8055,7 @@ static bool kick_one_cpu(s32 cpu, struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu, struct rq *this_r
 			if (cur_class == &ext_sched_class) {
 				if (likely(!scx_missing_caps(pcpu->sch, cpu,
 							     scx_caps_for_preempt(pcpu->sch, rq))))
-					set_task_slice(rq->curr, 0);
+					set_task_slice(rq->donor, 0);
 				else
 					__scx_add_event(pcpu->sch,
 							SCX_EV_SUB_PREEMPT_DENIED, 1);
-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-15 20:54 [PATCHSET v6 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched: Make proxy execution compatible with sched_ext Andrea Righi
2026-07-15 20:54 ` [PATCH 01/11] sched: Make NOHZ CFS bandwidth checks follow proxy donor Andrea Righi
2026-07-15 20:54 ` [PATCH 02/11] sched: Add helper to block retained proxy donors Andrea Righi
2026-07-16 17:47   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-17  6:03     ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-15 20:54 ` [PATCH 03/11] sched_ext: Block proxy donors across scheduler transitions Andrea Righi
2026-07-15 20:54 ` [PATCH 04/11] sched_ext: Fix ops.running/stopping() pairing for proxy-exec donors Andrea Righi
2026-07-15 20:54 ` [PATCH 05/11] sched_ext: Fix TOCTOU race in consume_remote_task() Andrea Righi
2026-07-15 20:54 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-07-15 20:54 ` [PATCH 07/11] sched_ext: Handle blocked donor migration with proxy execution Andrea Righi
2026-07-15 20:54 ` [PATCH 08/11] sched_ext: Delegate proxy donor admission to BPF schedulers Andrea Righi
2026-07-15 20:54 ` [PATCH 09/11] sched_ext: Add selftest for blocked donor admission Andrea Righi
2026-07-15 20:54 ` [PATCH 10/11] sched_ext: scx_qmap: Add proxy execution support Andrea Righi
2026-07-15 20:54 ` [PATCH 11/11] sched: Allow enabling proxy exec with sched_ext Andrea Righi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-16 13:20 [PATCHSET v7 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched: Make proxy execution compatible " Andrea Righi
2026-07-16 13:20 ` [PATCH 06/11] sched_ext: Split curr|donor references properly Andrea Righi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260715205622.276220-7-arighi@nvidia.com \
    --to=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=david.dai@linux.dev \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox