From: Nnamdi Onyeyiri <nnamdio@gmail.com>
To: nnamdio@gmail.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
horms@kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, kuniyu@google.com,
ncardwell@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] selftest/bpf: added selftest sockmap_basic/sockmap recvfrom eagain
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:53:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717155348.54975-3-nnamdio@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717155348.54975-1-nnamdio@gmail.com>
These selftests exercise the tcp_bpf_recvmsg() and tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser()
functions, to ensure that they are properly handling spurious wakeups in
tcp_msg_wait_data().
The expected behaviour is that recvfrom() does not return an EAGAIN
error. If the spurious wakeups are incorrectly handled, this assertion
will fail.
Signed-off-by: Nnamdi Onyeyiri <nnamdio@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
index cb3229711f93..852a12b17e6b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
@@ -1373,6 +1373,117 @@ static void test_sockmap_multi_channels(int sotype)
test_sockmap_pass_prog__destroy(skel);
}
+static void *test_sockmap_recvfrom_eagain_thread(void *arg)
+{
+ int fd = *(int *)arg;
+ char buf[1024];
+ void *result = NULL;
+
+ while (true) {
+ ssize_t len = recvfrom(fd, buf, sizeof(buf), 0, NULL, NULL);
+
+ if (len == -1) {
+ if (errno == EINTR)
+ continue;
+ result = (void *)1;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (!len || buf[len - 1] == 'e')
+ break;
+ }
+
+ send(fd, "test", 4, MSG_NOSIGNAL);
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+static void test_sockmap_recvfrom_eagain(bool with_verdict)
+{
+ struct test_sockmap_pass_prog *skel = NULL;
+ struct bpf_program *prog = NULL;
+ size_t buflen = 1024 * 1024 * 25;
+ char *buf = NULL;
+ int map, err;
+
+ skel = test_sockmap_pass_prog__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ map = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.sock_map_msg);
+
+ if (with_verdict) {
+ prog = skel->progs.prog_skb_verdict;
+ err = bpf_prog_attach(bpf_program__fd(prog), map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach verdict"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
+ buf = malloc(buflen);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc buf"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ memset(buf, 0, buflen);
+ buf[buflen - 1] = 'e';
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 200; ++i) {
+ ssize_t sent;
+ char ignored[128];
+ pthread_t thread;
+ bool thread_created = false;
+ size_t rem = buflen;
+ int c = -1, p = -1, zero = 0;
+ bool success = false;
+
+ err = create_pair(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, &c, &p);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "create_pair"))
+ goto end_attempt;
+
+ err = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, &test_sockmap_recvfrom_eagain_thread, &p);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create"))
+ goto end_attempt;
+ thread_created = true;
+
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &c, BPF_ANY);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem"))
+ goto end_attempt;
+
+ while (rem) {
+ sent = xsend(c, buf + (buflen - rem), rem, 0);
+ if (sent == -1)
+ goto end_attempt;
+ rem -= sent;
+ }
+
+ err = recvfrom(c, ignored, sizeof(ignored), 0, NULL, NULL);
+ if (err < 0 && !ASSERT_NEQ(errno, EAGAIN, "recvfrom eagain"))
+ goto end_attempt;
+
+ success = true;
+
+end_attempt:
+ if (c >= 0)
+ close(c);
+
+ if (thread_created) {
+ void *retval = NULL;
+
+ pthread_join(thread, &retval);
+ ASSERT_NULL(retval, "retval");
+ }
+
+ if (p >= 0)
+ close(p);
+ if (!success)
+ break;
+ }
+
+cleanup:
+ if (buf)
+ free(buf);
+
+ test_sockmap_pass_prog__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void test_sockmap_basic(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("sockmap create_update_free"))
@@ -1451,4 +1562,8 @@ void test_sockmap_basic(void)
test_sockmap_multi_channels(SOCK_STREAM);
if (test__start_subtest("sockmap udp multi channels"))
test_sockmap_multi_channels(SOCK_DGRAM);
+ if (test__start_subtest("sockmap recvfrom eagain"))
+ test_sockmap_recvfrom_eagain(false);
+ if (test__start_subtest("sockmap recvfrom eagain with verdict"))
+ test_sockmap_recvfrom_eagain(true);
}
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 15:53 [PATCH v5 0/2] bpf, sockmap: handle spurious tcp_msg_wait_data() wakeup Nnamdi Onyeyiri
2026-07-17 15:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " Nnamdi Onyeyiri
2026-07-17 15:53 ` Nnamdi Onyeyiri [this message]
2026-07-17 16:36 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] selftest/bpf: added selftest sockmap_basic/sockmap recvfrom eagain bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717155348.54975-3-nnamdio@gmail.com \
--to=nnamdio@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox