From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
Cc: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@linux.dev>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: ov9282: enable single-read I2C transactions
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:16:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721151614.GN50424@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPY8ntBUntw3DDRMfoCnr69yKfCMPcrPyqL2k8_-rGfr5tY8gg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 02:39:46PM +0100, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 at 14:25, Richard Leitner wrote:
> >
> > Some OV9282 camera modules, such as those from Vision Components, fail
> > multi-byte register reads with the default CCI I2C regmap access pattern
> > and only work when single-register read transactions are used. This
> > results in the driver being unable to probe due to a chip id mismatch.
>
> Those damn stupid Vision Components modules with the MCU that prevents
> you reading registers.
There's good news, the situation is improving with recent modules. We
still have to handle the other ones of course.
> I seem to recall Laurent had a plan for how to handle those without
> having to patch all the drivers, however I can't find that thread
> quickly.
I'm thinking of two options:
- We can introduce a new standard DT property for I2C device that will
be parsed by regmap or the I2C core directly, and switch to single
reads.
- We could model the MCU as some sort of I2C mux, sitting in DT between
the I2C controller and the image sensor, and translate multi-byte
reads to single-byte reads in that driver.
> > As the driver has no reliable way to identify affected modules enable
> > use_single_read for OV9282 unconditionally when creating the CCI regmap.
> >
> > Tested on an i.M8MP system with OV9282 modules from Vision Components.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@linux.dev>
>
> As regmap does provide a simple way to request this behaviour, and the
> only read is the ID register from ov9282_detect, I'll give it an
>
> Acked-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
>
> but it's not an ideal situation. Others can debate the alternative
> approaches for handling VC modules.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/i2c/ov9282.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9282.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9282.c
> > index 5b6f897a74fcd..8267a0a9c6f2d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9282.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9282.c
> > @@ -1283,6 +1283,11 @@ static int ov9282_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > struct ov9282 *ov9282;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + const struct cci_regmap_config config = {
> > + .reg_addr_bits = 16,
> > + .use_single_read = true,
> > + };
> > +
> > ov9282 = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ov9282), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!ov9282)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -1301,7 +1306,7 @@ static int ov9282_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - ov9282->regmap = devm_cci_regmap_init_i2c(client, 16);
> > + ov9282->regmap = devm_cci_regmap_init_i2c_cfg(client, &config);
> > if (IS_ERR(ov9282->regmap))
> > return dev_err_probe(ov9282->dev, PTR_ERR(ov9282->regmap),
> > "Failed to init CCI\n");
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 13:25 [PATCH 0/2] media: v4l2-cci/ov9282: support single-read I2C transactions Richard Leitner
2026-07-21 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] media: v4l2-cci: Add support for custom regmap configuration Richard Leitner
2026-07-21 13:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] media: ov9282: enable single-read I2C transactions Richard Leitner
2026-07-21 13:38 ` Alexander Stein
2026-07-21 15:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-07-21 15:15 ` Richard Leitner
2026-07-21 15:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-07-21 15:57 ` Richard Leitner
2026-07-22 8:00 ` Alexander Stein
2026-07-21 13:39 ` Dave Stevenson
2026-07-21 15:16 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2026-07-21 15:44 ` Richard Leitner
2026-07-21 15:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-07-21 16:01 ` Richard Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721151614.GN50424@killaraus.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.leitner@linux.dev \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox