From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: "John Ericson" <mail@johnericson.me>
Cc: "Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Cong Wang" <cwang@multikernel.io>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"David Rheinsberg" <david@readahead.eu>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Sergei Zimmerman" <sergei@zimmerman.foo>,
"network dev" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: unix_stream_connect and socket address resolution
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:05:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722110522.710ced10@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c437c7c-7919-41e2-9161-fc94803a9b34@app.fastmail.com>
On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:37:07 -0400
"John Ericson" <mail@johnericson.me> wrote:
> In case this is useful or interesting to anyone, I deep a some history
> spelunking, and the restart logic in question seems to date back to
> Import 2.2.4pre6:
>
> https://github.com/tbodt/linux-history/commit/7d4fc34b9bbc0a14d3e5f6b2f978373422e1ca8a#diff-0553d076c243e06ae312480cb8cb52f1cebe1d80fc099d3842593e12c9e0d4f3
>
> ---
> @@ -673,9 +703,25 @@ static int unix_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
> we will have to recheck all again in any case.
> */
>
> +restart:
> /* Find listening sock */
> other=unix_find_other(sunaddr, addr_len, sk->type, hash, &err);
>
> + if (!other)
> + return -ECONNREFUSED;
> +
> + while (other->ack_backlog >= other->max_ack_backlog) {
> + unix_unlock(other);
This unlocks the socket - I doubt it makes sense to sleep with it locked.
> + if (other->dead || other->state != TCP_LISTEN)
> + return -ECONNREFUSED;
Those look like potential UAF.
Hopefully changed in the current code!
> + if (flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + interruptible_sleep_on(&unix_ack_wqueue);
> + if (signal_pending(current))
> + return -ERESTARTSYS;
> + goto restart;
Since 'other' was unlocked the search must be repated.
David
> + }
> +
> /* create new sock for complete connection */
> newsk = unix_create1(NULL, 1);
>
> @@ -704,7 +750,7 @@ static int unix_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
>
> /* Check that listener is in valid state. */
> err = -ECONNREFUSED;
> - if (other == NULL || other->dead || other->state != TCP_LISTEN)
> + if (other->dead || other->state != TCP_LISTEN)
> goto out;
>
> err = -ENOMEM;
> ---
>
> My question can be basically restated: why should the `restart` label
> not go *after* the `unix_find_other` call?
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 7:39 [RFC PATCH 0/3] coredump, net: fix layer violation with direct connection John Ericson
2026-07-03 7:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] af_unix: factor out unix_lookup_bsd_path() John Ericson
2026-07-03 7:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] af_unix: factor out kernel_unix_connect_direct() John Ericson
2026-07-18 19:55 ` unix_stream_connect and socket address resolution John Ericson
2026-07-18 20:58 ` David Laight
2026-07-19 15:37 ` John Ericson
2026-07-21 20:37 ` John Ericson
2026-07-22 7:25 ` Günther Noack
2026-07-22 16:02 ` John Ericson
2026-07-22 10:05 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-07-03 7:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] coredump, net: remove `SOCK_COREDUMP` John Ericson
2026-07-03 8:11 ` Christian Brauner
2026-07-03 9:08 ` John Ericson
2026-07-03 9:31 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260722110522.710ced10@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cwang@multikernel.io \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@readahead.eu \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mail@johnericson.me \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=sergei@zimmerman.foo \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox