From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22D4471CEF; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784738619; cv=none; b=E1QoStNWHyTxWB7Aj9bVFVq2r/sSk+nsBl/BAUfONNpLJ6/3TqGDU7vP0pjsd1/D368aT9zjBUnKJpuQdk/zNOjN2AEWvwwBMsNUrgTFDaVXgXDlT8VcDHVXHDWQceoPeh2gDjc0IDcBmySi0DmYm6k/9bLGEYhGaJ94TFCnKZc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784738619; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XjYmCDMzYWYlPMl7zStNn6MTQiqYP3kthFphvhqNbBc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=KH0mPCio7mrXd5DE6umIV+FQhlCYkXq69pKxenJO9kFDFbNr1RU+45w7bCEPdQ6fn2rKkulXVlsNIToAjAnLFIGbvIRdtgfIsrBJmu+1UFfvFaVtn6yXYw0PRdUv0sseoDU3kQaYRxfutlRguUzhkJS1+BWeSs2BL5cMhkzWseU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=frFMMjw/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="frFMMjw/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1A061F00ACF; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:43:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784738607; bh=8zDLUS0bxfHwOpEZiuLxrdyTwvpr5eTnLI5y0qRTQxU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=frFMMjw/9WZCRrWn9HMsy59FxL0zNi+hvPx15mf+7ITLRmsKINtsz1mHqtW10HjjM P/G85OGf2n6XQOKQVuPJt63b4KqNusq08aGWk+q7lPMcIJya6+nv7XACJ1xVdcR1OI pjUGNIoss0NHU6O0X9b/h1egcKLcy840V0hdYPO6ZueakuuVRnXq7Ec1XLtyk2uZO1 P5PeACYwHxSOIFWSx4y4AXS/UTPGwalVEtUe/m4+krX4KfcSVllwnqtXQvlzgtrH7t eXE2lrOzTMMlf0uvRX5+4Zkym2npBO8q7M9oVrRhpEUtIl2FhRWJ5RSoPahWLAWr/E sWSX7Oo5/ANow== From: Sasha Levin To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sasha Levin , patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@nabladev.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, sr@sladewatkins.com, Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH 7.1 0000/2077] 7.1.5-rc1 review Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:43:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20260722113506.rc-reply-0006@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20260721152552.646164743@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 10:54:18AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > builtin-sched.c:1196:34: error: 'struct perf_sample' has no member named > 'file_offset' > > which is due to 6018a2a9ff1baa45426f7a52f8ec4f7d32fedfce ("perf sched: > Replace BUG_ON on invalid CPU with graceful skip"), we need to backport > a490187f22b4bfae7ef752edbe3fb13017ca11c ("perf sample: Add file_offset > field to struct perf_sample") Greg has queued 7a490187f22b for 7.1 (ordered right before the perf-sched patch), so this is resolved for -rc2. The other two perf build errors reported in this thread are covered as well: the libdw.c inline_node__clear_frames() failure is fixed by 674dea094ef6 ("perf srcline: Introduce inline_node__clear_frames()"), which is now also queued. Thorsten's third error ('evsel' undeclared in perf_session__deliver_event at util/session.c) doesn't apply to the queue itself: that code block comes from upstream a2e59fb79f449f ("perf session: Bound nr_cpus_avail and validate sample CPU"), which isn't queued for 7.1. His local cherry-pick of 7a490187f22b pulled in that surrounding context without the evsel declaration; the backport in the queue doesn't carry it. I verified the current queue's perf_session__deliver_event has no evsel reference and that perf from the current 7.1 queue builds cleanly, so -rc2 should be good. -- Thanks, Sasha