From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 9/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Make private exactly what can be mapped on page fault
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:08:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723210811.72720-10-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723210811.72720-1-seanjc@google.com>
When calling into arch code to make the underlying memory private, i.e. to
assign memory to the VM in SNP's RMP table, assign/convert *exactly* the
range of memory that can be mapped into the guest for the current page
fault, instead of aggressively converting/assigning the entire folio. For
SNP, the mapping size in the stage-2 page tables (Nested Page Tables, NPT)
must be at least the size of the corresponding RMP entry, e.g. assigning a
2MiB mapping in the RMP when it can only be mapped at 4KiB granualarity
will ultimate result in another page fault (#NPF for SNP) to "smash" the
RMP down to the correct mapping size.
Assigning the entire folio was necessary back when guest_memfd tracked
preparedness, which was done on a per-folio basis. At the time, it made
sense to do per-folio tracking/preparation, because tracking per-folio
meant guest_memfd didn't need to add a separate data structure to track
that information, and doing per-folio tracking only works if the entire
folio is prepared (or not).
Now that guest_memfd no longer does preparation tracking (see commit
8622ef05709f ("KVM: guest_memfd: Remove preparation tracking")), in favor
having SNP query the RMP, per-folio preparation, i.e. per-folio conversions
to private, doesn't make any sense.
*If* SNP allowed the RMP size to be greater than the NPT size, then
per-folio conversion could theoretically provide marginal value, as it
would allow KVM to assign a hugepage in the RMP even if it can only be
mapped into the NPT with a smaller page, e.g. because of memslot alignment.
The documentation of that reasoning would be something like this:
/*
* If the memory is private from KVM's perspective, and hardware tracks
* VM-assigned private memory in a dedicated data structure, i.e. not
* in the stage-2 page tables, then call into arch code to assign the
* entire folio to the guest. Assigning the entire folio, e.g. instead
* of only the memory being mapped into the guest, allows KVM to assign
* an entire hugepage of memory in the out-of-band structure even if
* KVM can only map a smaller page size into the MMU, e.g. because the
* gmem hugepage is spread across multiple memslots.
*/
But even *if* a future SNP implementation supported that behavior, the
value added would be dubious, as having a huge folio that is fully private,
but can only be mapped at a smaller granularity, would be rare. E.g. maybe
for memory at the top of lower DRAM that has holes for non-RAM assets?
So, convert/assign exactly what guest_memfd allows the caller to map to
simplify the guest_memfd code and provide a (super) minor performance
optimization for SNP. E.g. once hugepage support comes along, guest_memfd
will only need a single flow to compute "how much memory can be assigned
and at what size".
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 53 ++++++------------------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
index 255860c472ee..0bca42a0b346 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
@@ -70,50 +70,6 @@ static bool kvm_gmem_is_shared_mem(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
return !kvm_gmem_is_private_mem(inode, index);
}
-static int __kvm_gmem_prepare_folio(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
- pgoff_t index, struct folio *folio)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_CONVERT
- kvm_pfn_t pfn = folio_file_pfn(folio, index);
- gfn_t gfn = slot->base_gfn + index - slot->gmem.pgoff;
-
- return kvm_arch_gmem_make_private(kvm, gfn, pfn, folio_nr_pages(folio));
-#else
- return 0;
-#endif
-}
-
-/*
- * Process @folio, which contains @gfn, so that the guest can use it.
- * The folio must be locked and the gfn must be contained in @slot.
- * On successful return the guest sees a zero page so as to avoid
- * leaking host data and the up-to-date flag is set.
- */
-static int kvm_gmem_prepare_folio(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
- gfn_t gfn, struct folio *folio)
-{
- pgoff_t index;
-
- /*
- * Preparing huge folios should always be safe, since it should
- * be possible to split them later if needed.
- *
- * Right now the folio order is always going to be zero, but the
- * code is ready for huge folios. The only assumption is that
- * the base pgoff of memslots is naturally aligned with the
- * requested page order, ensuring that huge folios can also use
- * huge page table entries for GPA->HPA mapping.
- *
- * The order will be passed when creating the guest_memfd, and
- * checked when creating memslots.
- */
- WARN_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(slot->gmem.pgoff, folio_nr_pages(folio)));
- index = kvm_gmem_get_index(slot, gfn);
- index = ALIGN_DOWN(index, folio_nr_pages(folio));
-
- return __kvm_gmem_prepare_folio(kvm, slot, index, folio);
-}
-
/*
* Returns a locked folio on success. The caller is responsible for
* setting the up-to-date flag before the memory is mapped into the guest.
@@ -799,7 +755,9 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
{
pgoff_t index = kvm_gmem_get_index(slot, gfn);
struct folio *folio;
- int r = 0;
+ int r = 0, __order;
+
+ max_order = max_order ?: &__order;
CLASS(gmem_get_file, file)(slot);
if (!file)
@@ -814,8 +772,11 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_CONVERT
if (kvm_gmem_is_private_mem(file_inode(file), index))
- r = kvm_gmem_prepare_folio(kvm, slot, gfn, folio);
+ r = kvm_arch_gmem_make_private(kvm, gfn, *pfn,
+ (kvm_pfn_t)1 << *max_order);
+#endif
folio_unlock(folio);
--
2.55.0.229.g6434b31f56-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 21:08 [PATCH v6 0/9] KVM: guest_memfd: RECLAIM+CONVERT cleanups Sean Christopherson
2026-07-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Pass the number of pages instead of the end pfn into .invalidate() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-25 8:01 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-07-25 14:49 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-27 8:41 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Rename invalidate() arch hook to reclaim() and isolate it Sean Christopherson
2026-07-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_x86_ops' gmem_invalidate() to gmem_make_shared() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-25 8:25 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-07-25 14:55 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-27 8:51 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Drop the redundant printk on arch gmem_prepare() failure Sean Christopherson
2026-07-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Add helpers to query SHARED vs. PRIVATE for a given page Sean Christopherson
2026-07-25 8:37 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-07-25 14:58 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-27 8:54 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Only "prepare" folios for private pages Sean Christopherson
2026-07-27 8:56 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Rename prepare() hook and Kconfig to make_private() / CONVERT Sean Christopherson
2026-07-25 8:47 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-07-25 15:01 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-27 9:51 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-27 14:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-27 15:25 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Explicitly pass number of pages to make_private() hook Sean Christopherson
2026-07-25 15:14 ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-27 9:59 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-07-23 21:08 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-07-25 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Make private exactly what can be mapped on page fault Ackerley Tng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723210811.72720-10-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox