From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/10] s390/vfio_ccw: cancel existing workqueues
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:01:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260726040129.2946151-8-farman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260726040129.2946151-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>
The initialization of the io_work and crw_work workqueues begs the
question of whether they should be un-initialized. Add the corresponding
cleanup tags in _release_dev to ensure work isn't dispatched after
the private struct is free'd.
Suggested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: e5f84dbaea59 ("vfio: ccw: return I/O results asynchronously")
Fixes: 3f02cb2fd9d2 ("vfio-ccw: Wire up the CRW irq and CRW region")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index 032a1cdf4df7..9048c1e6e7f0 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -136,6 +136,9 @@ static void vfio_ccw_mdev_release_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
kfree(crw);
}
+ cancel_work_sync(&private->io_work);
+ cancel_work_sync(&private->crw_work);
+
kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_crw_region, private->crw_region);
kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_schib_region, private->schib_region);
kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_cmd_region, private->cmd_region);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-26 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-26 4:01 [PATCH v5 00/10] s390/vfio_ccw fixes Eric Farman
2026-07-26 4:01 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] s390/vfio_ccw: free all memory if cp_init() fails Eric Farman
2026-07-26 4:01 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] s390/vfio_ccw: limit the number of channel program segments Eric Farman
2026-07-26 4:01 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] s390/vfio_ccw: fix out of bounds check on CCW array Eric Farman
2026-07-26 4:01 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure first IDAW remains constant Eric Farman
2026-07-26 4:01 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] s390/vfio_ccw: calculate idal length based on idaw type Eric Farman
2026-07-26 4:01 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure index for read/write regions are within range Eric Farman
2026-07-26 4:01 ` Eric Farman [this message]
2026-07-26 4:01 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] s390/vfio_ccw: move cp cleanup out of not operational Eric Farman
2026-07-26 4:01 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a channel program mutex Eric Farman
2026-07-26 4:01 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a crw lock Eric Farman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260726040129.2946151-8-farman@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox